Laser and Microdermabrasion Before Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratoses in Field-cancerized Skin

NCT ID: NCT03006185

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of treatment efficacy and safety of pretreatment with ablative fractional laser versus microdermabrasion combined with large-area photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate for actinic keratoses

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For each study participant, two test areas (A and B) are demarcated in the same anatomical region, with each area containing no less than 5 actinic keratoses (AKs). Test areas are randomized to receive skin pretreatment of EITHER ablative fractional laser OR microdermabrasion prior to photodynamic therapy using methyl aminolevulinate.

Efficacy, local skin reactions and safety of both test areas are evaluated over a 12-15 week follow up period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Actinic Keratosis Sun Damaged Skin Solar Keratosis Solar Skin Damage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Split-Person Design: Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser vs Microdermabrasion

WIthin each participant, two 50 cm2 adjacent test areas were randomized to laser or microdermabrasion pretreatment prior to daylight photodynamic therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

One 50 cm2 test area was randomized to pretreatment using a fractional 2940 nm Er:YAG laser (Joule®; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). To remove hyperkeratosis, a fully-ablative 4 mm handpiece was optionally applied, followed by a single pass of a fractional Profrax 430 handpiece for all AKs. Subsequent field treatment consisted of a single pass of the Profrax 430 handpiece over the entire test area. Immediately after pretreatment, a 0.5 mm layer of methyl aminolevulinate (Metvix ® cream 16%; Galderma, Paris, France) was applied. After 30 minutes, patients were exposed to 2 hours of ambient daylight, according to approved procedure. After light exposure, cream was wiped off and test areas were covered for the remainder of the day.

Microdermabrasion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Another adjacent 50 cm2 test area was exposed to microdermabrasion using an MD pad with 58.5 µm-diameter particles (Ambu® Skin Prep Pads 2121M; Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark). Lesion-directed treatment consisted of an increasing number of swipes concentrated to AK lesions. During field treatment, multiple swipes were applied in perpendicular directions over the entire test area. Immediately after pretreatment, a 0.5 mm layer of methyl aminolevulinate (Metvix ® cream 16%; Galderma, Paris, France) was applied. After 30 minutes, patients were exposed to 2 hours of ambient daylight, according to approved procedure. After light exposure, cream was wiped off and test areas were covered for the remainder of the day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser

One 50 cm2 test area was randomized to pretreatment using a fractional 2940 nm Er:YAG laser (Joule®; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). To remove hyperkeratosis, a fully-ablative 4 mm handpiece was optionally applied, followed by a single pass of a fractional Profrax 430 handpiece for all AKs. Subsequent field treatment consisted of a single pass of the Profrax 430 handpiece over the entire test area. Immediately after pretreatment, a 0.5 mm layer of methyl aminolevulinate (Metvix ® cream 16%; Galderma, Paris, France) was applied. After 30 minutes, patients were exposed to 2 hours of ambient daylight, according to approved procedure. After light exposure, cream was wiped off and test areas were covered for the remainder of the day.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microdermabrasion

Another adjacent 50 cm2 test area was exposed to microdermabrasion using an MD pad with 58.5 µm-diameter particles (Ambu® Skin Prep Pads 2121M; Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark). Lesion-directed treatment consisted of an increasing number of swipes concentrated to AK lesions. During field treatment, multiple swipes were applied in perpendicular directions over the entire test area. Immediately after pretreatment, a 0.5 mm layer of methyl aminolevulinate (Metvix ® cream 16%; Galderma, Paris, France) was applied. After 30 minutes, patients were exposed to 2 hours of ambient daylight, according to approved procedure. After light exposure, cream was wiped off and test areas were covered for the remainder of the day.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with two skin areas of at least 50 cm2 with a minimum of 5 actinic keratoses (AKs) grade I-III, chronically sun damaged "field" changes in one of the following anatomical regions: face, scalp, upper chest.
* Patients who have given written informed consent and are believed to be capable of following the study protocol.
* Fertile women must have a negative pregnancy test (urine-hCG) at the time of inclusion and use anti-contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, gestagen depot injection, subdermal implantation, vaginal ring, transdermal depot bandage or sterilisation) during the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients that have within the last month received local treatment in the test areas.
* Pregnant or nursing patients.
* Patients with porphyria
* Patients with skin cancer, keratoacanthoma, or other infiltrating tumors within the test areas.
* Patients with a tendency to develop hypertrophic scars or keloids.
* Patients with a known allergy to Metvix cream
* Patients that are believe unlikely to follow the study protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Galderma R&D

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Merete Haedersdal

Professor and Senior Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Merete Haedersdal, MD, Dr. Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bispebjerg Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-002331-18

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H-16023991

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

New Treatments for Actinic Keratoses of the Scalp
NCT05456334 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA