A Comparative Study of Aleglitazar and Actos in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II Heart Failure.

NCT ID: NCT00461058

Last Updated: 2016-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 2 arm study will compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of aleglitazar and Actos in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic NYHA class II heart failure. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either aleglitazar, titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 0.3mg p.o. daily, or Actos, titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 45mg p.o. daily, in addition to prescribed diabetes therapy where applicable. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Actos

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Actos

Intervention Type DRUG

Titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 45mg p.o. daily

Aleglitazar

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

aleglitazar

Intervention Type DRUG

Titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 0.3mg p.o. daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Actos

Titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 45mg p.o. daily

Intervention Type DRUG

aleglitazar

Titrated to an individual maximum tolerated dose up to 0.3mg p.o. daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age;
* type 2 diabetes for \>=1 month;
* drug naive, or receiving stable doses of \<=2 oral antihyperglycemic medications;
* HbA1c 6.5-10.0% at screening;
* symptomatic, stable NYHA class 2 heart failure at screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* type 1 diabetes;
* current or previous treatment with insulin;
* uncontrolled hypertension;
* NYHA class 1, 3 or 4 at screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Slidell, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Culiacán, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Metepec, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Pachuca, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Arad, , Romania

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Târgovişte, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Israel Mexico Romania Russia Ukraine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BC20265

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.