Epiceram Versus Elidel for Treatment of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
NCT ID: NCT00460083
Last Updated: 2008-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-04-30
2008-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to determine whether Epiceram is a safe and effective therapy for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and whether it may serve as an alternative to Elidel therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Epiceram™ Device Versus Mid-Strength Topical Steroid (Fluticasone Propionate 0.05%) for Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
NCT00616538
Safety and Efficacy of Pimecrolimus Cream 1% in Atopic Disease Modification
NCT00124709
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Topical Creams for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis
NCT00828412
Pimecrolimus Cream 1% (Elidel®) and Medicated Device Cream (EletoneTM) in the Treatment and Maintenance of Atopic Dermatitis.
NCT01177566
Combination Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis
NCT00119158
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Epiceram, a newly FDA-approved medical device is a topical barrier repair cream designed to deliver special epidermal lipids to the top layers of the skin in order to correct skin barrier abnormalities found in atopic dermatitis. Epiceram does not contain corticosteroids or other conventional anti-inflammatory components and represents a novel class of skin barrier repair therapy for inflammatory skin disease. The objective of this study is to determine whether Epiceram is a safe and effective therapy for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and whether it may serve as an alternative to Elidel therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Elidel(r)
Elidel(R) (pimecrolimus 1%)
Epiceram(r)
EpiCeram(R) -ceramide based barrier repair cream
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Elidel(R) (pimecrolimus 1%)
EpiCeram(R) -ceramide based barrier repair cream
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis on the basis of the criteria defined by Hanifin and Rajka (Hanifin, 1980).
3. Rajka-Langeland Severity Index score of mild to moderate (Rajka, 1989).
4. At least one antecubital or popliteal fossa must be affected at the time of enrollment to serve as a target site.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Disease severity requiring medium-potency topical steroid medication to treat their atopic dermatitis more than 1 week per month.
3. Subjects with unstable or uncontrolled medical conditions that could require intensive treatment during the course of the study.
4. Subjects who require greater than 2.0 mg/day inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids.
5. Subjects who are currently participating in or, within the past 28 days, have participated in another study using an investigational drug.
6. Subjects with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to Epiceram, Elidel, or ingredients therein, including fragrances.
7. Active infection of any type at the start of the study.
8. Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated.
9. Subjects must have not used any topical or systemic therapy during the washout periods.
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric Simpson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSD
San Diego, California, United States
OHSU
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CGXP - 060674/ IRB00002569
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.