Educational CD-ROM Compared With Standard Informed Consent for Patients With Colorectal Cancer or a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00450424

Last Updated: 2014-09-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

239 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: The use of a CD-ROM may help patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer make informed decisions about undergoing microsatellite instability (MSI) testing.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying an educational CD-ROM to see how well it works compared with standard informed consent to assist decision-making about MSI testing in patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare the impact of standard informed consent vs a CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or a family history of CRC.
* Determine the impact of these interventions on patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision.

Secondary

* Determine whether the CD-ROM educational intervention has a differential impact on satisfaction with the MSI test decision, difficulty making the MSI test decision, and decisional conflict, as well as on patients' attitudes about MSI testing and CRC (e.g., perceived benefits and barriers to having the MSI test, perceived risk for colorectal and related cancers, self-efficacy), on general and cancer-related distress, and on discussions with family members about the MSI test and familial CRC risk.
* Assess whether demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support for testing, and cancer-related distress moderate the impact of the intervention on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot, study (part I) followed by a randomized study (part II).

* Part I: The educational CD-ROM is developed over 9 months. Patients receive a pilot version of the CD-ROM and provide feedback regarding usability and content.
* Part II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

* Arm I: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test.
* Arm II: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for MSI testing and the educational CD-ROM developed in phase I.

All patients in part II (even those that did not consent to the MSI test) complete a follow-up survey at 2 weeks.

Tissue samples from patients are analyzed by immunohistochemistry and MSI assay (polymerase chain reaction) for MLH1 and MSH2.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 184 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Hereditary Non-polyposis Colon Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Counseling

Participants will be given one of two counseling interventions regarding MSI testing: standard counseling or a CD-ROM intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

counseling intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants in the Counseling intervention will meet with the study health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI informed consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. The patients will either sign (or not sign, if they do not consent to have the test, or wish to think further about the decision) after this discussion. Participants who have further questions will be referred to either the attending physician or the genetics counselor at each hospital site.

CD-ROM intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants who are randomized to the CD-ROM condition will complete the baseline interview and then meet with the health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. Next, the participant will be provided with the CD-ROM to view on a laptop computer in the clinic. Participants will also be given a copy of the CD-ROM to take home and keep for future reference. The CD-ROM patients will sign (or not sign, if they do not consent or wish to think further about the decision) the consent form after this discussion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

counseling intervention

Participants in the Counseling intervention will meet with the study health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI informed consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. The patients will either sign (or not sign, if they do not consent to have the test, or wish to think further about the decision) after this discussion. Participants who have further questions will be referred to either the attending physician or the genetics counselor at each hospital site.

Intervention Type OTHER

CD-ROM intervention

Participants who are randomized to the CD-ROM condition will complete the baseline interview and then meet with the health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. Next, the participant will be provided with the CD-ROM to view on a laptop computer in the clinic. Participants will also be given a copy of the CD-ROM to take home and keep for future reference. The CD-ROM patients will sign (or not sign, if they do not consent or wish to think further about the decision) the consent form after this discussion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Three relatives with CRC with 1 being a first-degree relative of the other 2
* Cases that span ≥ 2 generations
* At least 1 CRC case diagnosed before 50 years of age

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* Not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* Not specified
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fox Chase Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sharon Manne, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Hospital

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manne SL, Meropol NJ, Weinberg DS, Vig H, Ali-Khan Catts Z, Manning C, Ross E, Shannon K, Chung DC. Facilitating informed decisions regarding microsatellite instability testing among high-risk individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 10;28(8):1366-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0399. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20142594 (View on PubMed)

Hall MJ, Manne SL, Winkel G, Chung DS, Weinberg DS, Meropol NJ. Effects of a decision support intervention on decisional conflict associated with microsatellite instability testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Feb;20(2):249-54. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0685. Epub 2011 Jan 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21212064 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04827

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01CA109332-05

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CDR0000443988

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT06401174 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA