A Comparison Between D1 and D2 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT00447746

Last Updated: 2007-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastric cancer remains the second most common cancer worldwide.Although the prognosis is poor for majority of patients , long term survival is achievable in patients in whom surgical resection is possible.

However the results of surgery are generally disapointing in most large series.The exception to this appears to be Japan and far east where a standardized approach to surgery is undertaken with low morbidity and mortality.The extent of surgery and particularly the development of systematic lymphadenectomy(D2)has been credited in Japan for the improved outcome in patients with gastric cancer.

Hence for comparing the difference between D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in terms of overall survival,disease free survival and loco regional recurrence and also post operative morbidity and mortality following both these procedures,this study has been undertaken.

In D1 lymphadenectomy, only those lymph nodes which are adjacent to the part of stomach being resected will be removed.In D2 lymphadenectomy other lymph nodes draining the stomach will also be removed according to internationally accepted guidelines and also include resection of greater omentum along with anterior layer of transverse mesocolon and lesser omentum upto its attachment to hepatoduodenal ligament.

Currently both these procedures are widely practised worldwide and there is no definite evidence showing the superiority of one procedure over the other.Neither is any of these procedures experimental.

We are doing this trial to see whether one of these procedures is superior to the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Preoperative clinical examination and imaging indicating operable disease.
* Intraoperative exploration indicating operability i.e. no peritoneal deposits,no evidence of para aortic lymphadenopathy,no direct involvement of contiguous organs
* Surgical plan for distal/proximal/total gastrectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Staging investigations or intraoperative exploration indicating inoperable disease
* Patients medically unfit for major surgery
* Patients who have been given preoperative chemotherapy/chemoradiation.
* Patients with gastroesophageal junction tumours
* Patients unreliable for follow up
* Patients above the age of 70 years
* Past history of malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tata Memorial Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr Parul J Shukla, M.S.,FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tata Memorial Centre,Mumbai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tata Memorial Hospital,Tata Memorial Centre

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr Parul J Shukla, M.S.,FRCS

Role: CONTACT

+912224177172

Dr Shailesh v Shrikhande, M.S.

Role: CONTACT

+912224177173

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMH 262

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.