Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
214 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-08-31
2007-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypotheses:
We hypothesize that a community-based early psychiatric interventional strategy (CEPIS) for depression in the elderly leads to increased recognition of depression by primary care physicians, more initiation of treatment for emotional problems, and improved outcomes for patients with depression, as measured by:
1. increased rates of detection or recognition by a primary care physician of minor or major (clinical) depression.
2. higher rates of management activities: counselling for psychological, family social problems, contact with community family services (human service agency), consultation and/or referral to a mental health specialist
3. Reduced depressive symptom severity, improved level of daily functioning and quality of life among those with major clinical depression
4. Better patient satisfaction with care
5. Favourable clinician's and patients perception of their usefulness or acceptability
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Health Care Management for the Elderly in Community Through Screening
NCT01347138
Effect of Depressin Screening and Care Program at Community Health Center
NCT01626703
Multidomain Intervention for Older Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03095820
Screening and Interventions in an Acute Care Setting
NCT00545155
Research on Three-level Prevention and Intervention for Elderly Depression in Urban Community
NCT06132061
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In recent decades, screening questionnaires have been developed and validated that are suitable for the initial detection of depression in the primary care setting. Previous research have shown that screening for depression do not result in increased recognition rates of mental disorders unless positive cases are selectively fed back to primary care physicians. They also do not translate into increased rates of interventional activities such as initiation of therapy and referral to mental health specialists. Neither dose primary care physician education or clinical practice guidelines result in any improved outcomes for the patients unless these are accompanied by more sophisticated strategies in the organization and delivery of care, such as structured, collaborative, multidisciplinary care together with quality improvement processes.
More empirical data are therefore needed to establish whether screening for psychiatric disorders will enhance the recognition of clinical disorder, leading to better patient outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care (controlled group)
Usual care for management of depression
No interventions assigned to this group
collaborative care (Intervention)
Collaborative care for management of depression for intervention group. We provided multidisciplinary groups of care from psychiatrist, psychologist, social counselor, general practitioners and case managers for intervention group.
Collaborative care (Intervention)
Structured shared care with treatment protocol \& support
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Collaborative care (Intervention)
Structured shared care with treatment protocol \& support
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Major depressive disorder,
* Bipolar disorder,
* Dysthymia disorder,
* Anxiety disorder,
* Mania/hypomania
Exclusion Criteria
* History of mania, psychiatric consultation or admission to hospital in past 3 months,
* MMSE score \<18,
* Fully dependent at 3 or more basic activities of daily living,
* Very high BDI score (\>=30),
* Serious suicidal risk,
* Current psychotic symptoms,
* Current alcohol abuse,
* Very high GDS score (\>=12) confirmed by SCID
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University of Singapore
OTHER
National University Hospital, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Psychological Medicine
Ng Tz Pin, MD, MFPHM, National University Hospital, Singapore
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ng Tz Pin, MD,MFPHM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Gerontological Research Programme, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NMRC/0846/2004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.