Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-31
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Do lonely and not lonely persons benefit the same way from inpatient depression treatment? Is loneliness a clinical relevant factor in inpatient treatment of depression? What are the underlying biopsychosocial mechanisms?
Participants will be asked to do some
* self-report questionnaires
* clinical interview
* biosampling (blood, saliva, stool) at three main measurement timepoints (1. begin of inpatient treatment, 2. day of discharge, 3. three months after discharge).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Depression and Increased Health Services Utilization Among Elderly Primary Care Patients
NCT00279526
Depression Care for Hospitalized Coronary Heart Disease Patients: Prospective Cohort Study
NCT01626027
Medication Treatment for Depression in Nursing Home Residents
NCT00076622
Sensor-based Characterization of Depression
NCT04370002
The Experience of Older Adults Facing Depression for the First Time in Old Age
NCT03009448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To examine the clinical relevance of the interplay between loneliness and depression, a prospective, noninterventional longitudinal design will be adopted. The study will be performed at the University Hospital and the community hospital in Erlangen, Germany. Every patient admitted to the hospital with depressive symptoms is eligible for screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three main measurement points (T0, T1, and T2) and brief interim measurements conducted at two-week intervals (t0.1 to t0.X and t1.1-t1.6) will be utilized. After screening and clinical interviews, participants will complete the baseline measurements (T0). Thereafter, each participant will adhere to an individual period corresponding to the duration of that specific patient's inpatient stay at the clinic until the second measurement is obtained (T1). Follow-up will occur three months after T1.
Given that the effect sizes of the interaction between loneliness and depression in a clinical population are currently unknown, the sample size for this study was determined based on considerations of practicability and the population generalizability of the obtained results, as well as statistical plausibility.
To ensure the external validity of the results, it is important that both severely lonely depressive patients and less lonely depressive patients, as well as different disease trajectories and patient characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and number of comorbidities), can be identified. A sample size of approximately 200 participants is expected to ensure sufficient heterogeneity. This sample size is practically feasible due to the fact that, even when considering an inclusion rate of 50% and a dropout rate of 30% for the primary diagnosis of depression at the University Hospital and the community hospital in Erlangen, the recruitment potential clearly exceeds the target number of cases within an estimated period of two years.
Without the knowledge of which measured level of loneliness at baseline represents a strong level of loneliness and which measured level represents a weak level of loneliness in a depressed patient population, a median split of loneliness at baseline will be performed to calculate the statistical significance of the interaction between loneliness and depression in the inpatient and follow-up course (T0, T1, and T2). To detect a significant interaction effect of a mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), when considering an α error of 0.05, a power of 0.9 (1-β error probability) and a correlation value among repeated measures of 0.5 for the groups defined as highly lonely and slightly lonely groups, the number of cases was calculated by using G\*Power Version 3.1.9.7. Assuming a small effect size (f= 0.10), the desired sample size would be determined at n= 214 individuals; moreover, assuming a medium effect size (f= 0.25), the sample size would be n= 36 individuals. This indicates that there is statistical plausibility for detecting interaction effects between loneliness and depression with the target number of cases.
Eligibility screening and clinical diagnostic screening, along with interviews, are conducted by study physicians. Depression is assessed during a clinical interview (MADRS) by the patient's treatment team, which also determines when the patient will be discharged from the hospital. All of the self-report assessments are collected by the patients themselves by using the REDCap online survey application. Biosampling will be exclusively performed among participants recruited at the University Hospital to ensure methodologically consistent and rapid processing. Routine clinical data are primarily extracted from clinical documentation systems and consolidated prior to analysis (similar to other data sources).
Given that the study design does not permit definitive causal conclusions to be determined regarding the direction of effects, the findings are expected to provide valuable insights and relevant implications. In particular, the following insights can be obtained: (1) a report on whether more or less lonely patients receive equal benefits from inpatient multimodal depression treatment; (2) insights into changes in loneliness during and after depression treatment; (3) important findings regarding the shared and nonshared biopsychosocial mechanisms underlying loneliness and depression; and (4) the effects of loneliness and depression with respect to secondary outcomes, including quality of life and suicidality.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* inpatient elective or emergency admission to one of the two psychiatric clinics; - age over 18 years
* sufficient understanding of spoken and written German
* informed voluntary consent
Exclusion Criteria
* previous participation in the study
* pregnancy or breastfeeding
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bezirkskliniken Mittelfranken, Clinic for Psychiatry, Addiction, Psychotherapie and Psychosomatic Medicine, Am Europakanal, Germany
UNKNOWN
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Franziska Sonnauer
Dr. med. Franziska Sonnauer, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Franziska Sonnauer, Dr. med., M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25-435-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.