Immunogenicity of GlaxoSmithKline Biological's Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine (580299) Versus Merck's Gardasil® in Healthy Females 18-45 Years of Age

NCT ID: NCT00423046

Last Updated: 2020-01-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-24

Study Completion Date

2012-05-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HPV infection has been established as a necessary cause of cervical cancer. GSK Biologicals has developed an HPV-16/18 L1 VLP AS04 vaccine (Cervarix TM) which targets the 2 most common oncogenic HPV types (HPV-16 and HPV-18), found in \> 70%, approximately, of all cervical cancers. Recently, Merck's HPV vaccine Gardasil® \[quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV-6,11,16,18 L1 VLP) recombinant vaccine\] has been approved by the FDA for prevention of genital tract cancers and pre-cancers and genital warts in females. Although the GSK HPV vaccine and Gardasil® have different compositions and are expected to have different efficacy profiles, each vaccine targets prevention of HPV-16 and 18 genital tract cancers and pre-cancers. Therefore, a comparison of the immunogenicity of the two vaccines is warranted. This Phase 3b study is designed to compare the immunogenicity of the GSK vaccine (HPV-16/18) to Gardasil® in healthy adult females 18-45 years of age.

The Protocol Posting has been updated as the study will be extended by 3 additional years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This Protocol Posting has been updated following Protocol Amendment 25, November 2010

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infections, Papillomavirus Papillomavirus Vaccines

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cervarix Group

Subjects received 3 doses of GSK Biologicals human papillomavirus \[HPV\]16/18 vaccine 580299 (CervarixTM) at Months 0, 1 and 6 and a dose of placebo at Month 2. All doses were administered by intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle of the upper arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GSK Biologicals HPV 16/18 vaccine 580299 (CervarixTM)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Three doses administered intramuscularly at months 0, 1 and 6

Placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One dose administered intramuscularly at month 2 to maintain blinding

Gardasil Group

Subjects received 3 doses of Gardasil® (Merck's human papillomavirus \[HPV\] vaccine) at Months 0, 2 and 6 and a dose of placebo at Month 1. All doses were administered by intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle of the upper arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gardasil ® (Merck & Co. Inc)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Three doses administered intramuscularly at months 0, 2 and 6

Placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One dose administered intramuscularly at month 1 to maintain blinding

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GSK Biologicals HPV 16/18 vaccine 580299 (CervarixTM)

Three doses administered intramuscularly at months 0, 1 and 6

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Gardasil ® (Merck & Co. Inc)

Three doses administered intramuscularly at months 0, 2 and 6

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

One dose administered intramuscularly at month 1 to maintain blinding

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

One dose administered intramuscularly at month 2 to maintain blinding

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cervarix

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A woman whom the investigator believes that she or her legally acceptable representative (in the event that the subject is illiterate) can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g., completion of the diary cards, return for follow-up visits).
* A woman between and including 18 and 45 years of age at the time of the first vaccination.
* Written informed consent must be obtained from the subject prior to enrollment.
* Subject must be free of obvious health problems as established by medical history and history-directed clinical examination before entering into the study.
* Subject must have a negative urine pregnancy test.
* Subject must be of non-childbearing potential, or if she is of child bearing potential, she must practice adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination, have a negative pregnancy test and continue such precautions for 2 months after completion of the vaccination series.
* Subject must have an intact cervix.

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccine(s) within 30 days preceding the first dose of study vaccine, or planned use during the study period up to Month 60.
* Chronic administration (defined as more than 14 days) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs within six months prior to the first vaccine dose or planned administration during the study period up to Month 60.
* Planned administration/administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol within 30 days before and 30 days after (i.e. days 0-29) each dose of vaccine. Administration of routine vaccines up to 8 days before each dose of study vaccine is allowed. Enrolment will be deferred until the subject is outside of specified window.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding. Women must be at least 3 months post-pregnancy and not breastfeeding to enter the study.
* A woman planning to become pregnant or planning to discontinue contraceptive precautions during approximately the first eight months of the study (Months 0-8).
* Previous administration of components of the investigational vaccine
* Previous or planned vaccination against HPV outside of this protocol.
* Any medically diagnosed or suspected immunodeficient condition based on medical history and physical examination.
* History of allergic disease, suspected allergy or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the study vaccines.
* Hypersensitivity to latex.
* Known acute or chronic, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurologic, hepatic or renal functional abnormality, as determined by previous physical examination or laboratory tests.
* History of significant medical conditions and currently under treatment.
* Received immunoglobulins and/or blood product within 90 days preceding enrolment or planned administration during the study period up to Month 60. Enrollment will be deferred until the subject is outside of specified window.
* Acute disease at the time of enrolment. Enrollment will be deferred until condition is resolved. All vaccines can be administered to persons with a minor illness
* Heavy bleeding (menstruation or other) or heavy vaginal discharge in which a pelvic exam cannot be performed. Enrollment will be deferred until condition is resolved according to investigator's medical judgement.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

West Covina, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Louisville, Colorado, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Arkansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bardstown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Milford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Stevensville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Carnegie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Upper Saint Clair, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Wenatchee, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Coursaget P et al. (2011) Priming as a basis for long-term protection and implications for HPV vaccination. Gynecologic Oncology. 121:S1-S9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Einstein MH, Baron M, Levin MJ, Chatterjee A, Edwards RP, Zepp F, Carletti I, Dessy FJ, Trofa AF, Schuind A, Dubin G; HPV-010 Study Group. Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of Cervarix and Gardasil human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer vaccines in healthy women aged 18-45 years. Hum Vaccin. 2009 Oct;5(10):705-19. doi: 10.4161/hv.5.10.9518. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19684472 (View on PubMed)

Einstein MH, Baron M, Levin MJ, Chatterjee A, Fox B, Scholar S, Rosen J, Chakhtoura N, Meric D, Dessy FJ, Datta SK, Descamps D, Dubin G; HPV-010 Study Group. Comparative immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 vaccine and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine: follow-up from months 12-24 in a Phase III randomized study of healthy women aged 18-45 years. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Dec;7(12):1343-58. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.12.18281. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22048173 (View on PubMed)

Einstein MH, Baron M, Levin MJ, Chatterjee A, Fox B, Scholar S, Rosen J, Chakhtoura N, Lebacq M, van der Most R, Moris P, Giannini SL, Schuind A, Datta SK, Descamps D; HPV-010 Study Group. Comparison of the immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 vaccine and the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine for oncogenic non-vaccine types HPV-31 and HPV-45 in healthy women aged 18-45 years. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Dec;7(12):1359-73. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.12.18282. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22048172 (View on PubMed)

Verstraeten T, Descamps D, David MP, Zahaf T, Hardt K, Izurieta P, Dubin G, Breuer T. Analysis of adverse events of potential autoimmune aetiology in a large integrated safety database of AS04 adjuvanted vaccines. Vaccine. 2008 Dec 2;26(51):6630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.049.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18845199 (View on PubMed)

Coursaget P et al. (2011) Priming as a basis for long-term protection and implications for HPV vaccination. Gynecologic Oncology . 121:S1-S9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Einstein MH, Levin MJ, Chatterjee A, Chakhtoura N, Takacs P, Catteau G, Dessy FJ, Moris P, Lin L, Struyf F, Dubin G; HPV-010 Study Group. Comparative humoral and cellular immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine in healthy women aged 18-45 years: follow-up through Month 48 in a Phase III randomized study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(12):3455-65. doi: 10.4161/hv.36117.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25483700 (View on PubMed)

Einstein MH, Takacs P, Chatterjee A, Sperling RS, Chakhtoura N, Blatter MM, Lalezari J, David MP, Lin L, Struyf F, Dubin G; HPV-010 Study Group. Comparison of long-term immunogenicity and safety of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine in healthy women aged 18-45 years: end-of-study analysis of a Phase III randomized trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(12):3435-45. doi: 10.4161/hv.36121.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25483701 (View on PubMed)

Schwarz TF, Kocken M, Petaja T, Einstein MH, Spaczynski M, Louwers JA, Pedersen C, Levin M, Zahaf T, Poncelet S, Hardt K, Descamps D, Dubin G. Correlation between levels of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and 18 antibodies in serum and cervicovaginal secretions in girls and women vaccinated with the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine. Hum Vaccin. 2010 Dec;6(12):1054-61. doi: 10.4161/hv.6.12.13399. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21157180 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Clinical Study Report

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Dataset Specification

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Annotated Case Report Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

108933

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.