Mu-Opioid Receptor Genetic Polymorphism and Intrathecal Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT00418015
Last Updated: 2014-04-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
293 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-10-31
2007-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
μ-opioid Receptor Polymorphism and Opioid Analgesia
NCT02099877
A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics (Acute Pain Trial)
NCT05966129
Genetic Determinants of Opioids Analgesia
NCT00226564
Heritability of Opioid Effects: A Twin Study
NCT00672438
Side Effects of a Single Shot Intrathecal Morphine in Clinical Practice, a Retrospective Analysis
NCT07238179
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study 2 (intrathecal morphine): The primary outcome variable is amount of rescue analgesia (morphine equivalents) necessary for 24 h after the intrathecal morphine injection. An overall sample size of 71 subjects (wild type OPRM1 = 50, variant OPRM1 = 21) achieves 81% power to detect a difference of 15 mg morphine equivalents between the null hypothesis that both group means are 40 mg morphine equivalents and the alternative hypothesis that the mean of one group is 25 mg morphine equivalents. The estimated group standard deviations are 20 mg morphine equivalents with alpha = 0.05 using a two-side Mann-Whitney test assuming that the actual distribution is uniform. This assumes that 70% of subjects will have the wild-type OPRM1 phenotype, and 30% the variant phenotype. To account for anticipated subject dropout, 90 subjects will be enrolled in the study.
Protocol specific methods:
Study 1: Eligible parturients admitted to the Labor and Delivery Unit of Prentice Women's Hospital will be approached for study participation immediately after the routine preanesthetic evaluation. This occurs shortly after admission to the Labor and Delivery Unit. Women who agree to participate will give written, informed consent at this time.
Venous blood will be obtained for genetic analysis of the 118 position of the µ-opioid receptor gene shortly after the subject consents to study participation, either through an intravenous catheter placed for routine intravenous access for labor and delivery, or through a fresh venipuncture. A total of 10 mL blood will be collected into two 5 mL EDTA tubes. The tubes will be batched, coded and stored in a 40C refrigerator until they will be send (1x/month) to the laboratory of Dr. J. L. Blouin, care of Dr. Landau, at the Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve. Genetic analysis will be performed as described below. When the subject first requests analgesia, her cervix will be examined (this is routine procedure prior to initiating analgesia). If the cervix is dilated between 2 and 5 cm, the parturient will be included in the study. Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain (100 mm line where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain) will be determined immediately before initiation of analgesia. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia will be initiated in the sitting position per routine with intrathecal fentanyl 25 microgram. An epidural catheter will be sited. No drug will be injected through the epidural catheter until the parturient requests analgesia again. The parturient will be placed in the lateral position after the epidural catheter is secured. A VAS will be determined 10 min after the intrathecal injection.
The primary outcome variable is duration of intrathecal fentanyl analgesia.At the time the parturient requests additional analgesia, the cervix will be examined. A VAS will be determined. In addition, the parturient will be asked about the presence of pruritus since the initiation of analgesia (none, mild, moderate, severe), nausea (none, mild, moderate or severe), and vomiting (yes, no). An epidural test dose will be administered (lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000). Assuming a negative test dose, bupivacaine 0.125% will be injected incrementally to a T10 sensory level. Epidural analgesia will be maintained with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 1.95 micro grams/mL: background infusion 15 mL/h, PCEA bolus 5 mL, lockout 10 min, maximum 30 mL/h) as per routine.
The study ends after the parturient delivers and the epidural infusion is discontinued. At this time the subject will be asked about her satisfaction with labor analgesia (100 mm scale, 0 mm = not satisfied at all, 100 mm = very satisfied).
The following data will be collected: maternal age, height, weight, race (self-described), cervical dilation at initiation of analgesia, time and cervical dilation at 2nd request for analgesia, maximum oxytocin dose, time to complete cervical dilation (10 cm), time to delivery, mode of delivery, neonatal weight, Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas values (obtained as part of routine care), total dose of epidural bupivacaine and other local anesthetics, total dose of epidural fentanyl, number of PCEA boluses and number of manual boluses (by the anesthesiologist).
Cases will be excluded from data analysis if CSE analgesia is not performed, if there is no analgesia (VAS \> 10 mm) 10 minutes after the intrathecal injection (failure of CSE technique), if cervical dilation is 8 cm within 60 minutes of intrathecal injection, or if the patient has a cesarean delivery. These cases will be reported.
Study 2: Eligible women admitted to the Labor and Delivery Unit of Prentice Women's Hospital for planned Cesarean delivery will be approached for study participation immediately after the routine preanesthetic evaluation. This occurs shortly after admission to the Labor and Delivery Unit. Women who agree to participate will give written, informed consent at this time.
Venous blood will be obtained for genetic analysis of the 118 position of the µ-opioid receptor gene shortly after the subject consents to study participation, either through an intravenous catheter placed for routine intravenous access for labor and delivery, or through a fresh venipuncture. A total of 10 mL blood will be collected into two 5 mL EDTA tubes. The tubes will be batched, coded and stored in a 4oC refrigerator until they are sent (1time/month) to the laboratory of Dr. J. L. Blouin, care of Dr. Landau, at the Hospitaux Universitaires de Geneve. Genetic analysis will be performed as described below Routine aspiration prophylaxis will be administered (intravenous ranitidine and metoclopramide, and oral antacid). Spinal anesthesia will be initiated in the sitting position in the routine manner with bupivacaine 12 mg (1.6 mL 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine), fentanyl 15 µg, and morphine 150 micrograms. Subjects will be placed in the supine left uterine displacement position immediately after the intrathecal injection. The level of cephalad sensory blockade will be determined 30 min after the intrathecal injection using von Frye hairs. Subjects with a sensory level below T6, or those that require intraoperative systemic opioid supplementation, will be excluded from further study participation.
In the PACU and for 24 hours after surgery, patients will receive ibuprofen 600 mg po q6h as per standard protocol. Patients may request rescue analgesia if they are experiencing discomfort. Rescue medication will consist of hydrocodone 10 mg plus acetaminophen 325 mg per os. An additional dose of hydrocodone 10 mg plus acetaminophen 325 mg will be provided after 1 hour if the pain is not relieved. These are routine oral analgesic medications for postoperative Cesarean delivery analgesia. Standard orders will be written for monitoring sedation and respiratory rate, and treatment of side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression).
The primary outcome variable is amount of rescue morphine equivalent analgesia required for the 24 hours after the intrathecal morphine injection.18 The time of first rescue analgesia request will be noted, and the VAS will be determined at the time of request for rescue analgesia. In addition, the parturient will be asked to provide a VAS for pain at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the intrathecal injection. The presence of pruritus (none, mild, moderate, severe), nausea (none, mild, moderate or severe), and vomiting (yes, no) will be determined at 4 and 24 h after the intrathecal injection.
The study ends 24 h after the intrathecal injection. At this time the subject will be asked about her satisfaction with postoperative analgesia (100 mm scale, 0 mm = not satisfied at all, 100 mm = very satisfied). Further analgesia will not be dictated by study protocol.
The following data will be collected: maternal age, height, weight, race (self-described), requirement for supplemental intraoperative sedation, neonatal weight, intra- or postoperative treatment for pruritus, nausea or vomiting. In addition to the time to first request for supplemental oral analgesia, the following will be recorded: supplement analgesia dose requirements (number of acetaminophen/hydrocodone tablets) at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h after the intrathecal injection.
DNA collection: Peripheral blood will be collected in 2 5ml EDTA tubes (total 10ml). DNA will be prepared by non-phenolic methods using Puregene Blood Extraction Kit (Gentra, Minneapolis, MN) and tested for molecular weight on gel electrophoresis and purity quality by optical densitometry measure (ratio 260/280 nm).
SNP genotyping: For identification of allelic distribution of the A118G SNP, 20-60 ng of DNA from individuals will be first amplified by PCR (on thermocycler apparatuses equipped with a 96 well-microtiter plate block) using primers designed in the vicinity of the SNPs. The SNP will be then genotyped in amplified products by minisequencing (Pyrosequencing).
Pyrosequencing: PCR using cDNA specific primers (spanning an intron in genomic DNA), in which the forward primer is labeled with 5' biotin is performed under standard conditions, and the product is analyzed by the Pyrosequencing method. Briefly, an internal primer is designed two nucleotides before the mutation site, so that the two mRNA populations could be assayed by quantifying the relative amounts of each allele present in the PCR product. DNA from normal and affected subjects are used as controls.
PCR products are immobilized with Dynabeads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) by a 15 min, 65 oC incubation in a buffer containing 10mM Tris-HCl, 2M NaCl, 1mM EDTA and 0.1% Tween 20. PCR products are then removed from solution using magnetic separation, denatured with NaOH 0.5 M and washed with 200mM Tris-Acetate, 50mM MgAc2. The remaining single stranded DNA is then hybridized with the internal 'sequencing' primer, by heating the mix to 80oC, and slowly cooling it to room temperature. Next enzyme and substrate mixes are automatically added to each well, and the reactions proceed at 28oC, by the sequential addition of single nucleotides at a predetermined order. Luciferase peak heights are proportional to the number of nucleotide incorporations, which has been shown to be very quantitative (5% error rate) in a number of experimental settings.
Coded DNA samples will be stored in Dr. Blouin's laboratory. No further sequencing will be done unless subjects signed the consent form for further future studies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Labor analgesia
Labor analgesia receiving fentanyl labor analgesia
Blood Draw
Blood for OPRM1 analysis
Cesarean delivery analgesia
Cesarean delivery analgesia consisting of spinal fentanyl and morphine
Blood Draw
Blood for OPRM1 analysis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood Draw
Blood for OPRM1 analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Nulliparous women in spontaneous labor or with spontaneous rupture of membranes
* Term pregnancy (≥ 37 weeks gestation)
* Vertex presentation
* Healthy, ASA PS 1-2
* Desire neuraxial labor analgesia.
Study 2: Cesarean Delivery
* Nulliparous women undergoing elective primary Cesarean delivery (e.g., for breech presentation, macrosomia)
* Term pregnancy (≥ 37 weeks gestation)
* Healthy, ASA PS 1-2
* Desired spinal anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic or pregnancy induced disease
* Chronic opioid use
* History of substance abuse
* Systemic opioid analgesia before initiation of neuraxial labor analgesia
* Cervical dilation \< 2 cm or \> 5 cm of time of request for neuraxial analgesia
* Allergy to fentanyl
Study 2: Cesarean delivery
* Chronic or pregnancy induced disease
* Chronic opioid use
* Previous abdominal or pelvic surgery
* Allergy to fentanyl, morphine, or bupivacaine
* BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2
* History of substance abuse
* Failed spinal anesthesia
* Requirement for systemic opioid supplementation during Cesarean delivery.
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cynthia Wong
Professor of Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cynthia A Wong, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Palmer SN, Giesecke NM, Body SC, Shernan SK, Fox AA, Collard CD. Pharmacogenetics of anesthetic and analgesic agents. Anesthesiology. 2005 Mar;102(3):663-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200503000-00028.
Befort K, Filliol D, Decaillot FM, Gaveriaux-Ruff C, Hoehe MR, Kieffer BL. A single nucleotide polymorphic mutation in the human mu-opioid receptor severely impairs receptor signaling. J Biol Chem. 2001 Feb 2;276(5):3130-7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006352200. Epub 2000 Nov 6.
Bond C, LaForge KS, Tian M, Melia D, Zhang S, Borg L, Gong J, Schluger J, Strong JA, Leal SM, Tischfield JA, Kreek MJ, Yu L. Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters beta-endorphin binding and activity: possible implications for opiate addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9608-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9608.
Grosch S, Niederberger E, Lotsch J, Skarke C, Geisslinger G. A rapid screening method for a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the human MOR gene. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;52(6):711-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01504.x.
Hollt V. A polymorphism (A118G) in the mu-opioid receptor gene affects the response to morphine-6-glucuronide in humans. Pharmacogenetics. 2002 Jan;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200201000-00001. No abstract available.
Lotsch J, Skarke C, Grosch S, Darimont J, Schmidt H, Geisslinger G. The polymorphism A118G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene decreases the pupil constrictory effect of morphine-6-glucuronide but not that of morphine. Pharmacogenetics. 2002 Jan;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200201000-00002.
LaForge KS, Shick V, Spangler R, Proudnikov D, Yuferov V, Lysov Y, Mirzabekov A, Kreek MJ. Detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms of the human mu opioid receptor gene by hybridization or single nucleotide extension on custom oligonucleotide gelpad microchips: potential in studies of addiction. Am J Med Genet. 2000 Oct 9;96(5):604-15. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:53.0.co;2-f.
Wang D, Quillan JM, Winans K, Lucas JL, Sadee W. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human mu opioid receptor gene alter basal G protein coupling and calmodulin binding. J Biol Chem. 2001 Sep 14;276(37):34624-30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104083200. Epub 2001 Jul 16.
Town T, Abdullah L, Crawford F, Schinka J, Ordorica PI, Francis E, Hughes P, Duara R, Mullan M. Association of a functional mu-opioid receptor allele (+118A) with alcohol dependency. Am J Med Genet. 1999 Oct 15;88(5):458-61.
Shi J, Hui L, Xu Y, Wang F, Huang W, Hu G. Sequence variations in the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) associated with human addiction to heroin. Hum Mutat. 2002 Apr;19(4):459-60. doi: 10.1002/humu.9026.
Schinka JA, Town T, Abdullah L, Crawford FC, Ordorica PI, Francis E, Hughes P, Graves AB, Mortimer JA, Mullan M. A functional polymorphism within the mu-opioid receptor gene and risk for abuse of alcohol and other substances. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7(2):224-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000951.
Sander T, Gscheidel N, Wendel B, Samochowiec J, Smolka M, Rommelspacher H, Schmidt LG, Hoehe MR. Human mu-opioid receptor variation and alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Dec;22(9):2108-10.
Wong CA: Combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management 2003; 7: 181-88
Palmer CM, Cork RC, Hays R, Van Maren G, Alves D. The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1998 Feb;88(2):355-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00014.
Nelson KE, Rauch T, Terebuh V, D'Angelo R. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 May;96(5):1070-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00007.
Clarke VT, Smiley RM, Finster M. Uterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia? Anesthesiology. 1994 Oct;81(4):1083. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199410000-00041. No abstract available.
Landau R, Cahana A, Smiley RM, Antonarakis SE, Blouin JL. Genetic variability of mu-opioid receptor in an obstetric population. Anesthesiology. 2004 Apr;100(4):1030-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200404000-00042. No abstract available.
Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
Ronaghi M, Uhlen M, Nyren P. A sequencing method based on real-time pyrophosphate. Science. 1998 Jul 17;281(5375):363, 365. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5375.363. No abstract available.
Wasson J, Skolnick G, Love-Gregory L, Permutt MA. Assessing allele frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA pools by pyrosequencing technology. Biotechniques. 2002 May;32(5):1144-6, 1148, 1150 passim. doi: 10.2144/02325dd04.
Neve B, Froguel P, Corset L, Vaillant E, Vatin V, Boutin P. Rapid SNP allele frequency determination in genomic DNA pools by pyrosequencing. Biotechniques. 2002 May;32(5):1138-42. doi: 10.2144/02325dd03.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0524-025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.