Mid-line Excision Versus Karydakis Operation for Pilonidal Sinus

NCT ID: NCT00412659

Last Updated: 2016-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The trial compares excision in the midline at surgery for pilonidal disease versus excision lateral of the midline (Karydakis operation) at surgery for pilonidal disease by randomly allocating patients with pilonidal disease to two groups of surgeons, each group being trained for one of the two methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Excision in the midline and primary suture is a long proven method of treating pilonidal sinus. However it's associated with high incidence of post operative infection and recurrence. On the other hand Karydakis operation (excision lateral of the midline, transposition flap and primary suture) is just a slightly more complicated procedure but has five times less recurrences reported in case series. The purpose of the present study is to compare the surgical results and costs of the two surgical methods utilized. In addition the investigators aim to compare the quality of life at defined time points after surgery. Eligible patients are randomized to two groups of surgeons, well trained in either the midline operation or the Karydakis operation (expertise based design). The design of the study allows wide inclusion criteria for participants, a cost-utility approach in the analysis, and a high external validity of the conclusions reached.

Comparison: Midline excision andd primary suture compared with the Karydakis operation (excision lateral of the midline and primary suture) for pilonidal disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pilonidal Sinus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Midline excision

Midline excision for pilonidal sinus disease.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery for pilonidal disease, midline excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A midline excision is made for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Karydakis

Karydakis operation for pilonidal sinus disease.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery for pilonidal disease, Karydakis operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Karydakis operation is done for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery for pilonidal disease, midline excision

A midline excision is made for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery for pilonidal disease, Karydakis operation

A Karydakis operation is done for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older.
* Surgery is considered the best available treatment.
* The patient understands trial information and is capable of making a decision for informed consent after having received information.
* The patient wants to undergo surgery for pilonidal sinus and accepts participation in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient has had a pilonidal abscess during the last four weeks before the planned day of surgery
* Patient has had surgery (excision) for pilonidal sinus more than once before.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norrlandstingens Regionförbund

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Markku Haapamaki

Associate professor, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christoffer Odensten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden

Markku M Haapamaki, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Umeå University

Peter Naredi, MD, Ph D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Umeå University

Michael Dahlberg, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

County Council of Norrbotten

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sunderby Regional Hospital

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå University Hospital

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cina CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schunemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):88. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7482.88.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15637373 (View on PubMed)

Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Nov;45(11):1458-67. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6451-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12432292 (View on PubMed)

Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973 Dec 22;2(7843):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92803-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4128725 (View on PubMed)

Dalenback J, Magnusson O, Wedel N, Rimback G. Prospective follow-up after ambulatory plain midline excision of pilonidal sinus and primary suture under local anaesthesia--efficient, sufficient, and persistent. Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):488-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00693.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15521941 (View on PubMed)

Hemmingsson O, Binnermark F, Odensten C, Rutegard M, Franklin KA, Haapamaki MM. Excision and suture in the midline versus Karydakis flap surgery for pilonidal sinus: randomized clinical trial. BJS Open. 2022 Mar 8;6(2):zrac007. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac007.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35289848 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PSIN-05-178M

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilonidal Sinus Disease
NCT06508086 RECRUITING NA
MIPE for Pilonidal Disease
NCT03772873 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
A Trial in Mini-invasive Pilonidal Sinus Disease Surgery
NCT06964763 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA