Efficacy and Safety of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia

NCT ID: NCT00401193

Last Updated: 2015-05-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

304 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Menorrhagia Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tranexamic acid tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

3900 mg/Day

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tranexamic acid tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

1950 mg/Day

3

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tranexamic acid tablets

3900 mg/Day

Intervention Type DRUG

Tranexamic acid tablets

1950 mg/Day

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lysteda XP12B Lysteda XP12B

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with menorrhagia
* 18-49 years of age
* Regularly occurring menstrual periods

Exclusion Criteria

* History or presence of clinically significant disease or abnormalities that may confound the study
* History of bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy
* Hormone therapy for birth control
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Development Support

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigative Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Groton, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Lighthouse PT, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Paw Paw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

McCook, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Moorestown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Strafford, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Wexford, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Clarksville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Pleasant Grove, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

West Valley City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Investigative Site

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Freeman EW, Lukes A, VanDrie D, Mabey RG, Gersten J, Adomako TL. A dose-response study of a novel, oral tranexamic formulation for heavy menstrual bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;205(4):319.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 May 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21777897 (View on PubMed)

Lukes AS, Muse K, Richter HE, Moore KA, Patrick DL. Estimating a meaningful reduction in menstrual blood loss for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Nov;26(11):2673-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.526098. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20942615 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XP12B-MR-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PAI-1, tPA, TFPI and HEECs in Uterine Hemostasis
NCT05862805 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2