Efficacy and Safety Study of BERIPLEX® P/N (Kcentra) Compared With Plasma in Patients With Acute Major Bleeding Caused by Anticoagulant Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00708435

Last Updated: 2014-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerance of BERIPLEX® P/N (Kcentra) compared with plasma in regard to rapid reversal of coagulopathy induced by coumarin derivatives in subjects who require immediate correction of INR (International Normalized Ratio)and to stop an acute major bleeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Coagulation Disorders Acute Major Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Beriplex® P/N

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Beriplex® P/N (Kcentra)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravenous infusion, dosage depending on baseline INR, amount of coagulation factor IX and body weight

Fresh frozen plasma

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fresh frozen plasma

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravenous Infusion, dosage depending on baseline INR and body weight

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Beriplex® P/N (Kcentra)

Intravenous infusion, dosage depending on baseline INR, amount of coagulation factor IX and body weight

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Fresh frozen plasma

Intravenous Infusion, dosage depending on baseline INR and body weight

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Kcentra

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years
* Subjects who have received oral vitamin K-antagonist therapy
* Subjects who have acute major bleeding, defined as one of the following: life-threatening or potentially life-threatening, acute bleeding associated with a fall in hemoglobin (Hb) level ≥ 2g/dL, bleeding requiring blood product transfusion
* INR ≥ 2 within 3 hours before start of study treatment
* Informed consent has been obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Expected survival of less than 3 days, or expected surgery in less than 1 day
* Acute trauma for which reversal of vitamin K antagonists alone would not be expected to control the acute bleeding event
* Use of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin use from 24 hours prior to enrollment or expected need within 24 hours after start of infusion
* For patients with ICH: Glasgow coma score (GCS) \< 7; intracerebral hematoma volume \> 30cc as assessed by ABC/21; for subdural hematomas: maximum thickness ≥ 10 mm, midline shift ≥ 5 mm; for subarachnoid hemorrhage: any evidence of hydrocephalus; infratentorial ICH location; epidural hematomas; intraventricular extension of hemorrhage; modified Rankin score (mRS) of \>3 prior to ICH
* History of thrombotic event, myocardial infarction, disseminated intravascular coagulation, cerebral vascular accident, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina pectoris, or severe peripheral vascular disease within 3 months of enrollment
* Known history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or lupus anticoagulant antibodies
* Suspected or confirmed sepsis at time of enrollment
* Administration of whole blood, plasma, plasma fractions or platelets within 2 weeks prior to inclusion into the study
* Large blood vessel rupture (e.g. in advanced cancer patient)
* Pre-existing progressive fatal disease with a life expectancy of less than 2 months
* Known inhibitors to coagulation factors II, VII, IX, or X; or hereditary protein C or protein S deficiency; or heparin-induced, type II thrombocytopenia
* Treatment with any other investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to inclusion into the study
* Presence or history of hypersensitivity to components of the study medication
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Prior inclusion in this study or any other CSL Behring-sponsored Beriplex study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CSL Behring

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Program Director, Clinical R&D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

CSL Behring

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Study Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

San Franciso, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Hazard, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Worchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Study Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 2

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Study Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Study Site 1

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Study Site 2

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Study Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 1

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 2

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 3

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site 4

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Study Site

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site 1

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site 2

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site 3

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Study Site

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 1

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 2

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Study Site

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 1

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 2

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 1

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 2

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 1

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site 2

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Study Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Study Site

Vinnytsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belarus Bulgaria Romania Russia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sarode R, Milling TJ Jr, Refaai MA, Mangione A, Schneider A, Durn BL, Goldstein JN. Efficacy and safety of a 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in patients on vitamin K antagonists presenting with major bleeding: a randomized, plasma-controlled, phase IIIb study. Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11):1234-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002283. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23935011 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1462

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2007-007861-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BE1116_3002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.