Tight Intra-Operative Glucose Control During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT00394303

Last Updated: 2009-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Blood glucose levels increase in response to stress, infection or other conditions faced by patients in the hospital. This occurs commonly among patients with known diabetes, but also among non-diabetic hospitalized patients. Tight glucose control, the maintenance of blood glucose levels within normal limits (80-120 mg/dl), has been shown to improve patient outcomes in the hospital in several settings, mainly among critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

We plan to assess the importance of tight glucose control during open-heart surgery. The prevalence of hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose) during this operation is high. Hyperglycemia may be associated with increased vulnerability to surgical site infections, neurological damage, cardiac and renal injury. Conversely, tight glucose control may be associated with hypoglycemia (pathologically low glucose levels) that may results in neurological injury. We hypothesize that tight glucose control will improve patient outcomes following surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current evidence supports intensive glucose control for patients in the intensive care unit post-cardiac surgery. The risk-benefit ratio of tight glucose control using continuous insulin infusion during surgery has not been established. Pros for tight control include the association of hyperglycemia with neurological injury, cardiac ischemia, white blood cell dysfunction and renal failure. The cons include adverse effects, mainly hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. As with any intervention in medicine, tight intra-operative glucose control should be assessed in a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives:to assess whether tight intra-operative tight glucose control using continuous insulin infusion reduces morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery, defined as the incidence rate of surgical site infections, adverse neurological events, renal failure and 30-day mortality following CABG.

Additional outcomes will include the effect of continuous insulin infusion on longer-term mortality; other infectious complications and antibiotic use during hospitalization; cardiovascular outcomes; the need for re-operations; length of hospital stay; readmission; hypoglycemia and other adverse events.

Design: randomized controlled trial, with blinding of outcome assessors.

Participants: all consecutive patients \>18 years undergoing CABG, without or without additional valve or other surgery at Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson campus, providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar coma.

Intervention: Continuous insulin infusion throughout the operation aimed to maintain normoglycemia using a nomogram

Control: Glucose management according to the discretion of the anesthesiologist (continuous or bolus infusion)

During the early post-operative period (ICU-stay following surgery), all patients will be treated with intensive glucose control targeting glucose levels between 80-110.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Bypass

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Nomogram specified in appendix

2

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

Control

Intervention Type OTHER

Glucose management according to the discretion of the anesthesiologist aimed to maintain glucose levels \<200 mg.dl, reflecting current practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraoperative continuous insulin infusion

Nomogram specified in appendix

Intervention Type DRUG

Control

Glucose management according to the discretion of the anesthesiologist aimed to maintain glucose levels \<200 mg.dl, reflecting current practice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All consecutive patients \>18 years undergoing CABG, without or without additional valve or other surgery at Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson campus, providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, or hyperosmolar coma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rabin Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mical Paul, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rabin Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital

Petah Tikvah, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4214

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.