Continuous Versus Episodic Amiodarone Treatment for the Prevention of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT00392431
Last Updated: 2007-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-01-31
2007-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Withdrawal Versus Continuation of Amiodarone in Successfully Treated Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00845780
Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Following Esophagectomy
NCT00420017
AMIOdarone vs. Catheter Ablation for Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02341105
Prevention of New Onset AF After TAVI (PAF-TAVI Trial)
NCT03991754
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous + Oral Vs. Oral Amiodarone in Preventing Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT06742866
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To determine differences in adverse event rates between patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are randomized to episodic amiodarone treatment (EAT) strategy and patients who are randomized to continuous amiodarone treatment (CAT) strategy, while atrial fibrillation is still effectively suppressed.
Adverse events can be related to:
1. amiodarone use
2. atrial fibrillation itself or underlying heart disease.
Secondary objective
To determine differences in quality of life between patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are randomized to the EAT strategy and patients who are randomized to the CAT strategy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
amiodarone
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Older than 18 years of age.
3. Ventricular rate during AF \> 75 beats per minute, documented on rest-ECG without rate control.
4. At least two weeks of oral anticoagulation therapy before screening.
5. Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of relapse of AF during adequate amiodarone treatment (i.e. adequate amiodarone and desethylamiodarone plasma levels).
3. Concomitant treatment with class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone should not have been used during the last 3 months.
4. Other (non) cardiac QT prolonging drugs (if not possible to discontinue).
5. First episode of persistent atrial fibrillation.
6. More than three relapses of persistent atrial fibrillation necessitating electrical cardioversion during the last three years.
7. Known sick sinus syndrome.
8. History of second or third degree AV conduction disturbances.
9. Intraventricular conduction disturbances (QRS\> 140ms).
10. Pacemaker treatment.
11. Hemodynamically significant valvular disease.
12. Patients with heart failure with symptoms according to NYHA class III or IV.
13. Unstable angina pectoris.
14. Recent myocardial infarction (\< 3 months).
15. PTCA, CABG, other cardiac surgery or major non-cardiac surgery within the last three months.
16. History of hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism.
17. Serious pulmonary, hepatic, haematological, metabolic, renal, gastrointestinal, CNS or psychiatric disease.
18. Pregnant and non-pregnant women who are pre-menopausal and are not practising an acceptable method of contraception.
19. Treatment with any other investigational agent.
20. Presence of any disease that is likely to shorten life expectancy to \< 1 year.
21. Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardise the evaluation of efficacy or safety or be associated with poor adherence to the protocol.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Netherlands Heart Foundation
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Isabelle C Van Gelder, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Medical Center Groningen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ahmed S, Ranchor AV, Crijns HJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC; CONVERT investigators. Effect of continuous versus episodic amiodarone treatment on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):785-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq049. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
Ahmed S, Rienstra M, Crijns HJ, Links TP, Wiesfeld AC, Hillege HL, Bosker HA, Lok DJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC; CONVERT Investigators. Continuous vs episodic prophylactic treatment with amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Oct 15;300(15):1784-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.15.1784.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2000B133
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.