Surveillance Study to Estimate the Incidence of Pure Red Blood Cell Aplasia Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Failure

NCT ID: NCT00391287

Last Updated: 2014-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

15334 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to estimate the incidence rate of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA; aplastic anemia) mediated by erythropoietin (EPO) antibodies in patients who are receiving subcutaneous (s.c.) epoetin alfa (polysorbate 80 formulation) for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic renal failure (CRF), and to compare this incidence rate to the incidence rate with s.c. exposure to other currently marketed recombinant erythropoietin products (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa), with adjustment of duration for which the drug is given to the patient. The study will also examine the impact of the pattern of using mixed s.c. exposure to multiple erythropoietin products occurring in this patients, and the impact of the time from which the treatment is started to the onset of PRCA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 1998, prompted by concern that human serum albumin (HAS- the stabilizer in the epoetin alfa formulation) could theoretically transmit Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and bovine spongiform encephalopathy, an alternative epoetin alfa formulation using polysorbate 80 as a stabilizer was introduced. The polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation became available in a variety of product presentations (i.e., single-use vials and prefilled syringes with both coated and uncoated stoppers) to provide for prescribing flexibility, patient convenience, and choice of route of administration. Soon after the introduction of the polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation in prefilled syringes, an increasing number of cases of EPO antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) were reported in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) exposed to epoetin alfa by the s.c. route. This led to contraindication of the s.c. route for epoetin alfa in the European Union (E.U.) and Switzerland in December 2002. It was subsequently shown that the increased risk for PRCA was associated with one specific polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa presentation - prefilled syringes with uncoated rubber stoppers. It appeared that uncoated rubber stoppers, when exposed to polysorbate 80, released organic compounds (leachates) into the epoetin alfa formulation, and that these leachates were the most probable product-specific cause for the increase in EPO antibody-mediated PRCA. A worldwide recall of the polysorbate 80 epoetin formulation in prefilled syringes with uncoated stoppers was completed in March 2004. FluroTec-coated stoppers are now used in all prefilled syringes containing the polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation, to prevent leachates from entering the formulation. Following these actions, the incidence rate of EPO antibody-mediated PRCA in CRF patients receiving s.c. epoetin alfa fell to a level similar to that for the HSA-containing epoetin formulation, which has a long-standing and well-characterized safety profile. As of 30 November 2005, s.c. exposure in CRF patients to the polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation in prefilled syringes with coated stoppers was 71,880 patient-years, with 4 cases of EPO antibody-mediated PRCA reported. In 2006, E.U. Health Authorities reauthorized s.c. epoetin alfa use in CRF patients for whom intravenous access is not readily available. As part of the reauthorization, the sponsor agreed to conduct this registry in order to demonstrate that the polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation using a coated stopper has an acceptable immunogenic safety profile and to define the incidence of EPO antibody-mediated PRCA associated with recombinant erythropoietin use among patients with anemia associated with CRF. This is a multicenter, multinational, immunogenicity surveillance registry using a prospective cohort design (patients identified by a common characteristic), with enrollment of parallel groups that are exposed to the polysorbate 80 formulation of epeotin alfa or other marketed erythropoietin products administered by the s.c. route of administration for the treatment of anemia associated with CRF. The registry is designed to address the following question: Is the current rate of PRCA with the s.c. polysorbate 80 epoetin alfa formulation using coated stoppers similar to the current rate with other marketed erythropoietin products administered by the s.c. route, adjusted for duration of exposure? Each patient will be observed for development of PRCA for up to 3 years. Information on exposure to erythropoietin products, stage of CRF, treatment modality for CRF, erythropoietin handling and storage information, and most recent hemoglobin level will be collected quarterly. Cases of unexplained loss or lack of effect (LOE) with an administered erythropoietin product, including cases of suspected PRCA, will be reported to the sponsor as serious adverse events. Cases of EPO antibody-mediated PRCA will be determined by the clinical presence of suspected PRCA, an unexplained LOE with administered erythropoietin product, and the presence of EPO antibody. An Independent Case Adjudication Committee will review blinded case data for patients with unexplained LOE and identify cases of EPO antibody-mediated PRCA. A separate Independent Safety Advisory Committee will be responsible for periodically reviewing unblinded patient data and summary data and will make recommendations related to the incidence rate of PRCA associated with s.c. epoetin alfa use. The sponsor will actively monitor registry enrollment and erythropoietin brand usage to ensure that the registry accrues 20,000 person-years of s.c. exposure to epoetin alfa and 20,000 person-years of s.c. exposure to all other erythropoietin products combined. If it appears that one registry arm will meet this accrual goal before the other, the sponsor may elect to selectively close those investigational sites with predominant use of the erythropoietin product(s) in the arm approaching full accrual. The registry will provide no inducement to change therapy and will be non-interventional.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pure Red-Cell Aplasia Chronic Kidney Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

erythropoietin treatment in CRF

Patients exposed to EPREX or other marketed erythropoietin products administered by the subcutaneous route of administration for the treatment of anemia of Chronic Renal Failure

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with established CRF as an indication for the treatment of anemia
* Patients who are receiving or are about to receive (within 1 month) a marketed erythropoietin (i.e., epoetin alfa \[EPREX/ERYPO/GLOBUREN\], epoetin beta \[NEORECORMON®\], or darbepoetin alfa \[ARANESP®\]) by the s.c. route of administration
* Patients who are likely to continue to receive s.c. erythropoietin product(s) for at least 1 year.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of pure red cell aplasia or aplastic anemia
* Patients who are experiencing unexplained loss or lack of effect to a recombinant erythropoietin product ongoing at the time of enrollment
* Patients who have had prior recombinant erythropoietin treatment whose anemia had never responded (primary lack of efficacy)
* Patients with a history of EPO antibodies prior to enrollment
* Subjects who are currently receiving immunosuppressive medication (e.g., cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolic mofetil, azathioprine, or monoclonal antibodies) or corticosteroids at a dose corresponding to \>15 mg/day prednisolone
* Subjects whose first s.c. exposure to any erythropoietin product was \>1 year prior to enrollment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen-Cilag International NV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Central Queensland M C, , Australia

Site Status

Fremantle, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Launceston, , Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, , Australia

Site Status

Newcastle, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, , Australia

Site Status

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Arlon, , Belgium

Site Status

Assebroek, , Belgium

Site Status

Ath, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Deinze, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Eeklo, , Belgium

Site Status

Frameries, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Gilly, , Belgium

Site Status

Huy, , Belgium

Site Status

Ieper, , Belgium

Site Status

La Louvière, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

Namur, , Belgium

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Gillis-Dendermonde, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Niklaas, , Belgium

Site Status

St-Truiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Tournai, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Westmalle, , Belgium

Site Status

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Århus N N/A, , Denmark

Site Status

Holstebro, , Denmark

Site Status

Sønderborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Aalen, , Germany

Site Status

Altötting, , Germany

Site Status

Alzey, , Germany

Site Status

Annaberg-Buchholz, , Germany

Site Status

Ansbach, , Germany

Site Status

Arnstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Aschersleben, , Germany

Site Status

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Aurich, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Bevensen, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Ems, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Homburg, , Germany

Site Status

Bad König, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Mergentheim, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Nenndorf, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Oeynhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Tölz, , Germany

Site Status

Bassum, , Germany

Site Status

Bergisch Gladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bernburg, , Germany

Site Status

Betzdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Biberach, , Germany

Site Status

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Bischofswerda, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Braunschweig, , Germany

Site Status

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Bremerhaven, , Germany

Site Status

Coburg, , Germany

Site Status

Cochem, , Germany

Site Status

Coesfeld, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Cottbus, , Germany

Site Status

Darmstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Deggendorf, , Germany

Site Status

Dillingen, , Germany

Site Status

Dinkelsbühl, , Germany

Site Status

Dormagen, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Eberswalde, , Germany

Site Status

Eisenach, , Germany

Site Status

Elmshorn, , Germany

Site Status

Elsenfeld, , Germany

Site Status

Emmering, , Germany

Site Status

Emsdetten, , Germany

Site Status

Erftstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Erkelenz, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Finsterwalde, , Germany

Site Status

Flensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Freiberg, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Fürstenwalde, , Germany

Site Status

Fürstenzell, , Germany

Site Status

Fürth, , Germany

Site Status

Gera, , Germany

Site Status

Göppingen, , Germany

Site Status

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Gütersloh, , Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, , Germany

Site Status

Halberstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamelin, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Haßfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Heidenau, , Germany

Site Status

Heilbronn, , Germany

Site Status

Helmstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Herford, , Germany

Site Status

Herzberg, , Germany

Site Status

Hilden, , Germany

Site Status

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

Hoyerswerda, , Germany

Site Status

Hürth, , Germany

Site Status

Ibbenbueren, , Germany

Site Status

Immenstadt im Allgäu, , Germany

Site Status

Ingolstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Kaiserslautern, , Germany

Site Status

Kamen, , Germany

Site Status

Kelheim, , Germany

Site Status

Kempten, , Germany

Site Status

Kerpen, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Kleve, , Germany

Site Status

Kronach, , Germany

Site Status

Kulmbach, , Germany

Site Status

Lahr, , Germany

Site Status

Landshut, , Germany

Site Status

Landstuhl, , Germany

Site Status

Langenfeld, , Germany

Site Status

Langenhagen, , Germany

Site Status

Langenselbold, , Germany

Site Status

Lehrte, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Leverkusen, , Germany

Site Status

Lichtenfels, , Germany

Site Status

Lindau, , Germany

Site Status

Linnich, , Germany

Site Status

Lohr, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Lüdenscheid, , Germany

Site Status

Lüneburg, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Malente, , Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Markkleeberg, , Germany

Site Status

Marl, , Germany

Site Status

Mayen, , Germany

Site Status

Meiningen, , Germany

Site Status

Moers, , Germany

Site Status

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Mühlhausen, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Neubrandenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Neunkirchen, , Germany

Site Status

Neuruppin, , Germany

Site Status

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Nürtingen, , Germany

Site Status

Oberschleißheim, , Germany

Site Status

Offenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Olpe, , Germany

Site Status

Passau, , Germany

Site Status

Peine, , Germany

Site Status

Pfaffenhofen, , Germany

Site Status

Pforzheim, , Germany

Site Status

Potsdam, , Germany

Site Status

Quedlinburg, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Remagen, , Germany

Site Status

Rosenheim, , Germany

Site Status

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Rüsselsheim am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Saarlouis, , Germany

Site Status

Sachsen, , Germany

Site Status

Saint Martin, , Germany

Site Status

Saint Wendel, , Germany

Site Status

Salzgitter, , Germany

Site Status

Schönebeck, , Germany

Site Status

Schwabach, , Germany

Site Status

Schwedt, , Germany

Site Status

Schweinfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, , Germany

Site Status

Seehausen, , Germany

Site Status

Seelow, , Germany

Site Status

Siegen, , Germany

Site Status

Sigmaringen, , Germany

Site Status

Sindelfingen, , Germany

Site Status

Singen, , Germany

Site Status

Sinsheim, , Germany

Site Status

Sonneberg, , Germany

Site Status

Spremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Stade, , Germany

Site Status

Straubing, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Suhl, , Germany

Site Status

Tangermünde, , Germany

Site Status

Traunstein, , Germany

Site Status

Uelzen, , Germany

Site Status

Viersen, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Waiblingen, , Germany

Site Status

Waldshut-Tiengen, , Germany

Site Status

Weinheim, , Germany

Site Status

Weißenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Weißenfels, , Germany

Site Status

Weißwasser, , Germany

Site Status

Wesseling, , Germany

Site Status

Weyhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Wittenberg, , Germany

Site Status

Wolfenbüttel, , Germany

Site Status

Worms, , Germany

Site Status

Wuppertal, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Zirndorf, , Germany

Site Status

Zwickau, , Germany

Site Status

Alexandroupoli, , Greece

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Chalcis, , Greece

Site Status

Didimoteicho, , Greece

Site Status

Edessa, , Greece

Site Status

Grevená, , Greece

Site Status

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Ioannina, , Greece

Site Status

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Piraias, , Greece

Site Status

Rhodes, , Greece

Site Status

Serres, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Thessalonikis, , Greece

Site Status

Véroia, , Greece

Site Status

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Weert, , Netherlands

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Tvnsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Chojnice, , Poland

Site Status

Ciechanów, , Poland

Site Status

Działdowo, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk-Zaspa, , Poland

Site Status

Koszalin, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Oława, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Proszowice, , Poland

Site Status

Radomsko, , Poland

Site Status

Rybnik, , Poland

Site Status

Stalowa Wola, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Łomża, , Poland

Site Status

Aveiro, , Portugal

Site Status

Barcelos, , Portugal

Site Status

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Evora, , Portugal

Site Status

Faro, , Portugal

Site Status

Leiria, , Portugal

Site Status

P-1100 Lisboa N/A, , Portugal

Site Status

Portalegre, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

S. Joao Da Madeira, , Portugal

Site Status

Setúbal, , Portugal

Site Status

Viana do Castelo, , Portugal

Site Status

Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal

Site Status

Alcorcón, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Burgos, , Spain

Site Status

Castellon, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Leganés, , Spain

Site Status

León, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Manresa, , Spain

Site Status

Marañón, , Spain

Site Status

Mollet del Vallès, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Teruel, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Avesta, , Sweden

Site Status

Bollnäs, , Sweden

Site Status

Borås, , Sweden

Site Status

Eksjö, , Sweden

Site Status

Eskilstuna, , Sweden

Site Status

Gällivare, , Sweden

Site Status

Gävle, , Sweden

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Halmstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlshamn, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlskoga, , Sweden

Site Status

Karlskrona, , Sweden

Site Status

Köping, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Norrköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Nyköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Örnsköldsvik, , Sweden

Site Status

Östersund, , Sweden

Site Status

Skellefteå, , Sweden

Site Status

Skene, , Sweden

Site Status

Skövde, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Trollhättan, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Varberg, , Sweden

Site Status

Värnamo, , Sweden

Site Status

Västerås, , Sweden

Site Status

Västervik, , Sweden

Site Status

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Nyon, , Switzerland

Site Status

Schwyz, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sierre, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sion, , Switzerland

Site Status

Wil, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Antrim, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Basildon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bradford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Carshalton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Derby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Doncaster, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Great Yarmouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Inverness, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kilmarnock, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Londonderry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Merseyside, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Merthyr Tydfil, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Portsmouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Shrewsbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stevenage, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Suffolk, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Belgium Denmark Finland Germany Greece Ireland Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://filehosting.pharmacm.com/DownloadService.ashx?client=CTR_JNJ_6051&studyid=736&filename=CR011587_CSR.pdf

Prospective, Immunogenicity Surveillance Registry (PRIMS) to Estimate the Incidence of Erythropoietin Antibody-Mediated Pure Red Cell Aplasia Among Subjects With Chronic Renal Failure and Subcutaneous Exposure to Recombinant Erythropoietin Products

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPOANE4014

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

001992-001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR011587

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.