FATA: Randomized Study on Facilitated Angioplasty With Tirofiban or Abciximab

NCT ID: NCT00383136

Last Updated: 2008-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

692 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-06-30

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The elective("standard of care") treatment of ST - elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) currently consists of primary angioplasty with stent implantation during administration of Abciximab, a inhibitor of GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor.

Tirofiban is another potent inhibitor of GP IIb/IIIa platelet receptor with an efficacy on platelet aggregation inhibition equal to or greater than Abciximab if a high dose bolus is used, i.e. 25 microg/kg, (platelet aggregation inhibition \> 90% 15 minutes after infusion). It can therefore be hypothesized that this drug can improve the results of primary angioplasty to the same extent as Abciximab.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, in terms of myocardial reperfusion indices, of Abciximab and high dose of Tirofiban in primary angioplasty for STEMI, both in the case of treatment before transfer and of treatment in the catheterization laboratory during the procedure.

The reference hypothesis for the study objective is the equivalence or the non-inferiority of Tirofiban with respect to Abciximab.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Facilitated Angioplasty with Tirofiban or Abciximab Study (FATA Study) is a prospective multicentre study, randomized in 2 groups (high dose Tirofiban or Abciximab), on a sample of 700 patients with acute myocardial infarction for whom primary angioplasty is indicated. Patients will be enrolled in the Emergency Room or in the Intensive Care Unit and other hospital departments or externally in the event of intervention by the Emergency Ambulance Service 118. For all these patients it must be possible to administer a IIb/IIIa inhibitor immediately after ECG and clinical diagnosis, before transfer to the cath lab for the primary angioplasty procedure. Patients arriving directly in the cath lab without being randomized before transfer will also be included.

Major exclusion criteria are: Complete left bundle branch block, Previous myocardial infarction at the same site, Post-anoxic coma, Known thrombocytopenia or leucopenia, Previous episodes of hemorrhagic diathesis or allergy to ASA or thienopyridine; Anticoagulant therapy with dicumarol with INR \> 2; Previous treatment with thrombolytics (within the previous 48 hours).

Randomization will take place as soon as possible after the diagnostic ECG and will be performed by means of a centralized automatic system using SMS messages sent by ordinary cell phones.

The primary endpoint is ST resolution 90 minutes after opening of the affected vessel. Secondary endpoints include: Patency of the vessel at the first selective angiography, no reflow phenomenon during the procedure, TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure, MACE (death, reinfarction\*, urgent TVR°) at 30 days, MACE (death, reinfarction\*, TVR°) at 6 months, major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, or a reduction in Hb of more than 5 g%, Ictus and intracranial hemorrhage.

To demonstrate the study hypothesis, i.e. that Tirofiban is equivalent to Abciximab in facilitating primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction, with sufficient statistical significance, the necessary number of patients for each drug was calculated on the basis of the methods used in equivalence studies and was fixed in 350 pts per group.

390 patients have been randomized (as of Sept 15th, 2006). Results are expected by the end of 2007.

This study will establish whether in primary angioplasty a high dose of Tirofiban has an equivalent effect to Abciximab, first in terms of microcirculation protection and then of long-term clinical results. If this hypothesis is confirmed, Tirofiban could be used as an alternative to Abciximab, with considerable savings given its much lower cost.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Tirofiban

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tirofiban high-bolus dose regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

bolus of 25 mcg/kg of body weight, followed by 18 hours infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/min.

2

Abciximab

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Abciximab

Intervention Type DRUG

bolus of 0.25 mg/kg of body weight, followed by 12 hours infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg per minute

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tirofiban high-bolus dose regimen

bolus of 25 mcg/kg of body weight, followed by 18 hours infusion of 0.15 mcg/kg/min.

Intervention Type DRUG

Abciximab

bolus of 0.25 mg/kg of body weight, followed by 12 hours infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg per minute

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aggrastat Reopro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. STEMI diagnosed due to the presence of chest pain lasting at least 20 minutes and less than 6 hours, associated with elevation of the ST segment \>1 mm in at least 2 adjacent leads
2. Informed consent
3. Age \> 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

1. Complete left bundle branch block
2. Previous myocardial infarction at the same site
3. Post-anoxic coma
4. Known thrombocytopenia or leucopenia
5. Severe hepatic dysfunction;
6. Previous episodes of hemorrhagic diathesis or allergy to ASA or thienopyridine;
7. Recent major surgery (\< 3 months before)
8. Associated diseases that involve short life expectancy (\< 2 years);
9. Arterial hypertension (AP \>180/110);
10. Positive case history for stroke within the previous 30 days;
11. Positive case history for intracranial disease (aneurysm, arterovenous malformation);
12. Major trauma within the previous six weeks;
13. A clinical condition which, in the doctor's opinion, could interfere with the patient's full participation in the study;
14. Pregnancy or fertile age;
15. Anticoagulant therapy with dicumarol with INR \> 2;
16. Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dl) known at the time of the study;
17. Previous treatment with thrombolytics (within the previous 48 hours);
18. Participation in other studies in progress.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Istituto di Cardiologia, University of Bologna

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ANTONIO MARZOCCHI, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ISTITUTO DI CARDIOLOGIA, AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA S.ORSOLA-MALPIGHI, BOLOGNA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore

Bologna, BO, Italy

Site Status

Laboratorio Di Emodinamica, Istituto Di Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola Malpighi

Bologna, BO, Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico

Modena, MO, Italy

Site Status

Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale S.Maria Nuova

Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy

Site Status

Divisione Di Cardiologia, Ospedale Per Gli Infermi

Rimini, RN, Italy

Site Status

Divisione Di Cardiologia Ii, Ospedale Policlinico Le Molinette

Torino, TO, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marzocchi A, Manari A, Piovaccari G, Marrozzini C, Marra S, Magnavacchi P, Sangiorgio P, Marinucci L, Taglieri N, Gordini G, Binetti N, Guiducci V, Franco N, Reggiani ML, Saia F; FATA Investigators. Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):2972-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn467. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18940887 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FATA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High Ticagrelor Loading Dose in STEMI
NCT01898442 COMPLETED PHASE2