Efficacy Of Eptifibatide Compared To Abciximab In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) For Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
NCT ID: NCT00426751
Last Updated: 2012-11-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
429 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Abciximab
Intravenous bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg/min (max. 10 mcg/min) for 12 h after PCI.
Abciximab
Intravenous bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg/min (max. 10 mcg/min) for 12 h after PCI.
Eptifibatide
Intravenous bolus of 180 mcg/kg followed immediately by a continuous infusion of 2.0 mcg/kg/ min for 20-24 h after end of PCI, and a second bolus of 180 mcg/kg administered 10 min after the first bolus.
Eptifibatide
Intravenous bolus of 180 mcg/kg followed immediately by a continuous infusion of 2.0 mdg/kg/ min for 20-24 h after end of PCI, and a second bolus of 180 mcg/kg administered 10 min after the first bolus.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Abciximab
Intravenous bolus of 0.25 mg/kg followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.125 mcg/kg/min (max. 10 mcg/min) for 12 h after PCI.
Eptifibatide
Intravenous bolus of 180 mcg/kg followed immediately by a continuous infusion of 2.0 mdg/kg/ min for 20-24 h after end of PCI, and a second bolus of 180 mcg/kg administered 10 min after the first bolus.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute myocardial infarction \< 12 h defined as:
1. Angina or equivalent symptoms \> 20 min and
2. ST elevation in 2 contiguous ECG leads (= 2 mm precordial lead, = 1 mm limb lead). This ECG recording serves as baseline ECG, i.e. ECG I.
* Planned primary percutaneous coronary intervention
* The subject has given written informed, dated consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Left Bundle Branch Block
* Thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours before randomization
* Oral anticoagulation with International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 2
* Known platelets \< 100.000/µl or known hemorrhagic diathesis
* Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) within the past 6 months or any permanent residual neurological defect
* Evidence of an active gastrointestinal or urogenital bleeding
* Major surgery within 6 weeks
* History of allergic reaction to abciximab or eptifibatide or any component used in the study (including contrast media)
* Severe concomitant disease with life expectation \< 1 year
* Subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug or device within 30 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer) of entry into this study.
* Subjects who will be inaccessible due to geographic or social factors during treatment or follow-up
* In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Alençon, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Bordeaux, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Caen, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Créteil, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Melun, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Melun, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Nancy, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Ollioules, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Pau, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Perpignan, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Pessac, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Toulon, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
GSK Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Offenbach, Hesse, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Mönchengladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Homburg, Saarland, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zeymer U, Margenet A, Haude M, Bode C, Lablanche JM, Heuer H, Schroder R, Kropff S, Bourkaib R, Banik N, Zahn R, Teiger E. Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 3;56(6):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.093.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
106915
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id