Etoricoxib for Routine Post-operative Pain Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00373464
Last Updated: 2011-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-31
2007-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Pre-operative Administration of Etoricoxib 120 mg, Etoricoxib 120 mg and Paracetamol 1 g Combination or Placebo in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Gynaecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT00763685
A Study of MK0663/Etoricoxib for Post-Abdominal Hysterectomy Surgery Pain (0663-097)(COMPLETED)
NCT00788710
Pain Post Abdominal Laparoscopy Prevention With Arcoxia
NCT00565682
Etoricoxibe - Preemptive and Postoperative Analgesia for Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery
NCT00716833
Etoricoxib as a Pre-emptive Analgesic in Therapeutic Arthroscopy
NCT00738608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As quite extensive surgical procedures presently are being undertaken on an ambulatory basis the need for adequate post-operative pain prophylaxis is stressed. Pain and nausea/vomiting are the most frequent causes of delayed discharge or unanticipated admission to hospital stay after ambulatory surgery (1). As opioids for postoperative pain relief have a lot of unwanted side-effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, sleepiness, obstipation, disturbed physiological sleep \[2\]), it has been shown beneficial, both in terms of cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction, to reduce the need of opioids in post-operative setting by other means (i.e. non-opioid) methods of pain-relief. The concept of multimodal, non-opioid pain prophylaxis and treatment is being advocated as optimal after ambulatory surgery. The most important modes of non-opioid pain prophylaxis, at present, is paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and local anaesthesia. The best result is achieved when these different modes are used together in a prophylactic manner; the need of rescue opioid analgesics may be reduced by 20-50% and in many cases diminish (3). It has been shown in many studies that the NSAID is an important component in routine post-operative pain prophylaxis, e.g. NSAID in combination with paracetamol provides better analgesic effect than paracetamol alone, and may be equianalgesic to a small-medium dose of opioid (2).
There are four problems with NSAIDs when used for routine pain prophylaxis in ambulatory surgery/anaesthesia: increased bleeding tendency, gastrointestinal ulceration, renal failure and anaphylactic reactions (2-4).
There are definite potential benefits with etoricoxib in ambulatory setting (5-7): Due to cox-II selectivity there is no concern of increased bleeding tendency; thus the drug can be given pre-operatively. It is a potent, oral coxib; thus cheaper and more simple than IV NSAIDs. It has a long duration of effect; thus the need of patient attention is reduced because the first dose lasts for 24 h and a single daily dose will be optimal further on.
It has a lower potential of gastrointestinal ulceration, thus may be used in some patients where conventional NSAIDs may be contraindicated.
It has so far not been shown to have harmful cardiovascular effects in prospective studies of continuous use for at least 12 months in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular complications (ref 8: Edge study).
Study rationale: Etoricoxib has so far been compared with traditional oral NSAIDs and oral coxibs for postoperative pain prophylaxis. However, in many clinical situations the use of pre-operative conventional NSAIDs is not recommended due to the risk of preoperative bleeding. These patients are usually given IV ketorolac during the last part of the procedure as the most efficient alternative for post-operative pain prophylaxis.
It will be of great interest to compare this practice with the use of oral etoricoxib given pre-operatively. If the analgesic quality of an adequate dose etoricoxib is comparable to a ketorolac regimen, the etoricoxib approach will have a lot of potential benefits: simple, cheap, earlier start of analgesia, more longlasting analgesia and less risk of postoperative bleeding and gastrointestinal ulcer. If successful, a single pre-operative dose of etoricoxib may be a routine measure in a majority of all ambulatory surgery patients.
Hypotheses: A single dose pre-operative of oral etoricoxib 120 mg will have equal post-operative analgesic efficacy as an optimal regimen of IV ketorolac 30 mg + 30 mg during the first 18 h( +/- 1 h) after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgical procedure, where the need for post-operative opioid is expected.
Bibliography:
1. Chung F, Mezei G: Adverse outcomes in ambulatory anesthesia. Can. J Anaesth. 1999; 46:R18-R34.
2. Dahl V, Raeder JC: Non-opioid postoperative analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2000; 44:1191-203.
3. Dahl V, Raeder JC, Drosdal S, Wathne O, Brynildsrud J: Prophylactic oral ibuprofen or ibuprofen-codeine versus placebo for postoperative pain after primary hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1995; 39:323-6.
4. Rawal N: Postoperative pain management in day surgery. Anaesthesia 1998; 53 Suppl. 2: 50-2.
5. Chang DJ, Desjardins PJ et al. The analgesic efficacy of etoricoxib compared with oxycodone/acetaminophen in an acute post-operative pain model. Anest. Analg. 2004; 99; 807-15.
6. Cochrane DJ, Jarvis B et al. Etoricoxib. Drugs 2003; 62:2637-51.
7. Malmstrøm K, Sapre A et al. Etoricoxib in acute pain associated with dental surgery. Clin. Ther. 2004; 26:667-79.
8. The EDGE study: MSD preliminary communication.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
etoricoxib
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent.
* Weight between 50 and 120 kg.
Exclusion Criteria
* Sensitivity to the study drug or its components.
* Cardiovascular risk conditions: heart failure, unstable hypertension, coronary artery disease (i.e. angina, previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary artery bypass surgery).
* Cerebrovascular disease.
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
University of Oslo
OTHER
Ullevaal University Hospital
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johan Ræder, Prof.MD,PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ullevaal University Hospital
Harald Lenz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ullevaal University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ullevaal University Hospital
Oslo, Oslo County, Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005-003078-92
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.