Plastic Stents Compared With Metal Stents in Treating Patients With Malignant Dysphagia Caused by Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00372450
Last Updated: 2019-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-12-31
2008-04-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying self-expanding plastic stents to see how well they work compared with self-expanding metal stents in treating patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Comparison of Large vs. Small Diameter Esophageal Stents for Palliation of Malignant Dysphagia
NCT01894763
a Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial of Self-Expandable Esophageal Radiation Stent
NCT01054274
Trial Using 125I Embedded Stent in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer
NCT00826813
Treatment of Malignant Strictures in Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction With Covered or Partially Covered Stent.
NCT02166320
Self-Expandable Esophageal Radiation Stent:a Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer
NCT00477841
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Assess differences from baseline in health-related quality of life of patients with malignant dysphagia due to cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction palliated with self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) compared to those who receive self-expanding metal stents (SEMS).
Secondary
* Perform a cost-effective analysis of each type of stent by independent evaluation of the rates of SEPS-related and SEMS-related morbidity that necessitates repeat endoscopic interventions and/or additional healthcare costs in these patients.
* Analyze effective palliation (degree and duration of improvement of dysphagia) in these patients.
* Determine the individual rates of complication associated with each type of esophageal stent in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
* Arm I: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding metal stent on day 1.
* Arm II: Patients undergo placement of a self-expanding plastic stent on day 1. Health-related quality of life is assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 3 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 90 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
management of therapy complications
quality-of-life assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed primary cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction
* Squamous cell or other type
* Diagnosis of malignant dysphagia
* Disease deemed surgically inoperable, but may be any of the following:
* Locally contained
* Locally advanced
* Metastatic
* Unresponsive to previous chemoradiotherapy
* Recurrent despite previous surgical resection
* Must be either an inpatient OR outpatient at Johns Hopkins Hospital
* No known tracheal compression by tumor burden
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Karnofsky performance status 50-100%
* Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
* Platelet count \> 50,000/mm³
* INR \< 1.5
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* Prior surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy allowed
* No concurrent surgery, chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or radiotherapy
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanjay Jagannath, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDR0000489157
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
JHOC-J05109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NA_00001547
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
J05109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.