RAISE: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Study With Eltrombopag

NCT ID: NCT00370331

Last Updated: 2017-04-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

197 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The rationale for this Phase III study is to evaluate the 6 month safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in the treatment of previously treated subjects with chronic ITP. The starting dose of eltrombopag, 50 mg, once daily was selected based upon the observed efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in a dose-finding Study (TRA100773). This Phase III study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study, to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag, initially administered as 50 mg oral tablets once daily for six months in adult subjects with previously treated chronic ITP. Subjects will be randomized 2:1, eltrombopag to placebo, and will be stratified based upon splenectomy status, use of ITP medication at baseline and baseline platelet count less than or equal to 15,000/µL. Subjects will receive study medication for 6 months, during which the dose of study medication may be adjusted based upon individual platelet counts. In addition, subjects may taper off concomitant ITP medications and may receive any rescue treatments as dictated by local standard of care. After discontinuation of study medication, subjects will complete follow-up visits at weeks 1, 2, 4 and months 3 and 6.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study, to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, administered for 6 months as oral tablets once daily in adult subjects with previously treated chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment arm plus standard of care

Subjects will initiate treatment with 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eltrombopag

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down.

placebo plus standard of care

Subjects will initiate treatment with 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

eltrombopag

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Subjects will initiate treatment with either 50 mg eltrombopag or matching placebo once daily. Based upon the subjects platelet count at each visit, the dose of eltrombopag may be adjusted either up or down

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply:
* Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent.
* Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with chronic ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Hematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines \[George, 1996; BCSH, 2003\], and platelet count \< 30,000/μL on Day 1 (or within 24 hours prior to dosing on Day 1). In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other causes of thrombocytopenia (e.g. pseudothrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP.
* Subjects who have previously received one or more prior ITP therapies. Previous treatments for ITP include but are not limited to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, azathioprine, danazol, cyclophosphamide and/or rituximab.
* Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count \> 100,000/μL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia.
* Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to randomization and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective.
* Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to randomization. The medication should be continued with a stable dose for the initial 6 weeks of study "Concomitant ITP Therapy")
* Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state.
* A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions:
* \< 30,000 platelets/μL on Day 1 (or within 24 hours of Day 1) is required for inclusion,
* Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10 g/dL (100 g/L) and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss).
* ANC ≥ 1500/μL (1.5 x 10\^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable).
* The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
* Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal \> 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index \<1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study:
* Complete abstinence from intercourse;
* Intrauterine device (IUD);
* Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide);
* Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female;
* Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only). Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions and intends to complete the study as planned.

Exclusion Criteria

* A subject will NOT be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
* Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g., thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease).
* Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis.
* Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc \>450 msec.
* Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
* History of alcohol/drug abuse.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for \> 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
* History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
* All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections.
* Previous participation in a clinical study with eltrombopag.
* Patients planning to have cataract surgery.
* In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lawton, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Weston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Jiang Su Province, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Giessen, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Heraklion, Crete, , Greece

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Shatin, , Hong Kong

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Manipal, , India

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Albano Laziale (Roma), Lazio, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Padua, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Vicenza, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Grafton, , New Zealand

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Legnica, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Sfax, , Tunisia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Sousse, , Tunisia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tunis, , Tunisia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Leed, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Morriston, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Rhyl, Denbighshire, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Canada China Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hong Kong India Italy Netherlands New Zealand Peru Poland Russia Slovakia Spain Taiwan Tunisia Ukraine United Kingdom Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cheng G, Saleh MN, Marcher C, Vasey S, Mayer B, Aivado M, Arning M, Stone NL, Bussel JB. Eltrombopag for management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (RAISE): a 6-month, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2011 Jan 29;377(9763):393-402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60959-2. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20739054 (View on PubMed)

Haselboeck J, Pabinger I, Ay C, Koder S, Panzer S. Platelet activation and function during eltrombopag treatment in immune thrombocytopenia. Ann Hematol. 2012 Jan;91(1):109-13. doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1249-5. Epub 2011 May 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21553010 (View on PubMed)

Hayes S, Ouellet D, Zhang J, Wire MB, Gibiansky E. Population PK/PD modeling of eltrombopag in healthy volunteers and patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and optimization of response-guided dosing. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;51(10):1403-17. doi: 10.1177/0091270010383019. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21148042 (View on PubMed)

Tarantino MD, Fogarty P, Mayer B, Vasey SY, Brainsky A. Efficacy of eltrombopag in management of bleeding symptoms associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Apr;24(3):284-96. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fac99.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23492914 (View on PubMed)

Fogarty PF, Tarantino MD, Brainsky A, Signorovitch J, Grotzinger KM. Selective validation of the WHO Bleeding Scale in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644849. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22117897 (View on PubMed)

Signorovitch J, Brainsky A, Grotzinger KM. Validation of the FACIT-fatigue subscale, selected items from FACT-thrombocytopenia, and the SF-36v2 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1737-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9912-9. Epub 2011 May 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21533818 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRA102537

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.