EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study)

NCT ID: NCT00351468

Last Updated: 2017-04-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

302 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An open-label, dose-adjustment, extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have previously been enrolled in an eltrombopag trial. This study will allow adjustment of the eltrombopag dose to achieve an individualized dose and schedule for each subject. In addition, the ability to reduce the dose of concomitant ITP medications in the presence of eltrombopag, while maintaining platelet counts = 50,000/μL will be investigated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Eltrombopag

Open-label eltrombopag

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)

Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent.
* Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines \[George, 1996; BCSH, 2003\]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP.
* Prior completion of treatment and follow up periods in an ITP study of eltrombopag (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT).
* Subjects previously enrolled in Study TRA100773 must have completed the prescribed follow-up ophthalmic assessment at 6 months.
* Subjects previously enrolled in TRA102537/RAISE or other studies that may lead into EXTEND (e.g., TRA108057/REPEAT) must have completed the treatment and follow-up periods as defined in that protocol.
* Subject experienced no eltrombopag-related toxicity or other drug intolerance on prior eltrombopag study (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT) even if resolved; subjects discontinued from previous study due to toxicity will not be eligible unless they received placebo.
* Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including thrombosis.
* Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count \> 100,000/mL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia
* Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to first dose of study medication and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective.
* Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study medication.
* Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state.
* A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions:
* Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dL and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss).
* ANC≥1500/mL (1.5 x 10\^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable).
* The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
* Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal \> 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index \<1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study:
* Complete abstinence from intercourse;
* Intrauterine device (IUD);
* Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide);
* Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female;
* Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only).
* Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions.

Exclusion Criteria

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:

* Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis.
* Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND≥two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis
* Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (including congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc \>450 msec.
* Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin (b-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
* History of alcohol/drug abuse.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for \> 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
* History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
* All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections.
* A subject is planning to have cataract surgery.
* In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.

Other Eligibility Criteria Considerations:

To assess any potential impact on subject eligibility with regard to safety, the investigator must refer to the following document(s) for detailed information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other significant data pertaining to the investigational product(s) being used in this study: CIB, SPM.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brunsville, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis investigative Site

Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Jiang Su Province, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Giessen, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shatin, New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Albano Laziale (Roma), Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Novartis investigative Site

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Padua, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Grafton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Takapuna, Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Karachi, , Pakistan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lahore, , Pakistan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lima, Lima Province, Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Słupsk, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Badalona/Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Novartis investigative Site

Montfleury, , Tunisia

Site Status

Novartis investigative Site

Sfax, , Tunisia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sousse, , Tunisia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tunis, , Tunisia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Canada China Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hong Kong Italy Netherlands New Zealand Pakistan Peru Poland Romania Russia Slovakia Slovenia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan Thailand Tunisia Ukraine United Kingdom Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wong RSM, Saleh MN, Khelif A, Salama A, Portella MSO, Burgess P, Bussel JB. Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of chronic/persistent ITP with eltrombopag: final results of the EXTEND study. Blood. 2017 Dec 7;130(23):2527-2536. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-748707. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29042367 (View on PubMed)

Tarantino MD, Fogarty P, Mayer B, Vasey SY, Brainsky A. Efficacy of eltrombopag in management of bleeding symptoms associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Apr;24(3):284-96. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fac99.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23492914 (View on PubMed)

Saleh MN, Bussel JB, Cheng G, Meyer O, Bailey CK, Arning M, Brainsky A; EXTEND Study Group. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia: results of the long-term, open-label EXTEND study. Blood. 2013 Jan 17;121(3):537-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-425512. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23169778 (View on PubMed)

Fogarty PF, Tarantino MD, Brainsky A, Signorovitch J, Grotzinger KM. Selective validation of the WHO Bleeding Scale in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644849. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22117897 (View on PubMed)

Signorovitch J, Brainsky A, Grotzinger KM. Validation of the FACIT-fatigue subscale, selected items from FACT-thrombocytopenia, and the SF-36v2 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1737-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9912-9. Epub 2011 May 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21533818 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRA105325

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.