Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
302 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-06-30
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RAISE: Randomized Placebo-Controlled Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Study With Eltrombopag
NCT00370331
A Rollover Study to Provide Continued Treatment With Eltrombopag
NCT01957176
A Longitudinal 2-year Bone Marrow Study of Eltrombopag in Previously Treated Adults, With Chronic Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
NCT01098487
Eltrombopag and the Bcl-extra-large (xL) Pathway in Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
NCT00902018
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eltrombopag in Pediatric Patients With Thrombocytopenia From Chronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
NCT00908037
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Eltrombopag
Open-label eltrombopag
eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines \[George, 1996; BCSH, 2003\]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP.
* Prior completion of treatment and follow up periods in an ITP study of eltrombopag (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT).
* Subjects previously enrolled in Study TRA100773 must have completed the prescribed follow-up ophthalmic assessment at 6 months.
* Subjects previously enrolled in TRA102537/RAISE or other studies that may lead into EXTEND (e.g., TRA108057/REPEAT) must have completed the treatment and follow-up periods as defined in that protocol.
* Subject experienced no eltrombopag-related toxicity or other drug intolerance on prior eltrombopag study (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT) even if resolved; subjects discontinued from previous study due to toxicity will not be eligible unless they received placebo.
* Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including thrombosis.
* Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count \> 100,000/mL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia
* Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to first dose of study medication and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective.
* Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study medication.
* Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state.
* A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions:
* Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dL and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss).
* ANC≥1500/mL (1.5 x 10\^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable).
* The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
* Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal \> 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index \<1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study:
* Complete abstinence from intercourse;
* Intrauterine device (IUD);
* Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide);
* Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female;
* Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only).
* Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis.
* Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND≥two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis
* Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (including congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc \>450 msec.
* Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin (b-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
* History of alcohol/drug abuse.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for \> 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
* History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
* All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections.
* A subject is planning to have cataract surgery.
* In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
Other Eligibility Criteria Considerations:
To assess any potential impact on subject eligibility with regard to safety, the investigator must refer to the following document(s) for detailed information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other significant data pertaining to the investigational product(s) being used in this study: CIB, SPM.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Duarte, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Peoria, Illinois, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Brunsville, Minnesota, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Seattle, Washington, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, Washington, United States
Novartis investigative Site
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, , Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Jiang Su Province, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, , China
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, , Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Olomouc, , Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, , Czechia
Novartis Investigative Site
Odense, , Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuopio, , Finland
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Pessac, , France
Novartis Investigative Site
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Shatin, New Territories, , Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Albano Laziale (Roma), Lazio, Italy
Novartis investigative Site
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Padua, Veneto, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Amersfoort, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
The Hague, , Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Auckland, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Christchurch, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Grafton, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Takapuna, Auckland, , New Zealand
Novartis Investigative Site
Karachi, , Pakistan
Novartis Investigative Site
Lahore, , Pakistan
Novartis Investigative Site
Lima, Lima Province, Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
Lima, , Peru
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Lodz, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Lublin, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Słupsk, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Torun, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, , Russia
Novartis investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Košice, , Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Prešov, , Slovakia
Novartis Investigative Site
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Badalona/Barcelona, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Palma de Mallorca, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Pamplona, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, , Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Novartis Investigative Site
Stockholm, , Sweden
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, , Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, , Thailand
Novartis Investigative Site
Khon Kaen, , Thailand
Novartis investigative Site
Montfleury, , Tunisia
Novartis investigative Site
Sfax, , Tunisia
Novartis Investigative Site
Sousse, , Tunisia
Novartis Investigative Site
Tunis, , Tunisia
Novartis Investigative Site
Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine
Novartis Investigative Site
Lviv, , Ukraine
Novartis Investigative Site
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
London, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
London, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Reading, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Swansea, , United Kingdom
Novartis Investigative Site
Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wong RSM, Saleh MN, Khelif A, Salama A, Portella MSO, Burgess P, Bussel JB. Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of chronic/persistent ITP with eltrombopag: final results of the EXTEND study. Blood. 2017 Dec 7;130(23):2527-2536. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-748707. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Tarantino MD, Fogarty P, Mayer B, Vasey SY, Brainsky A. Efficacy of eltrombopag in management of bleeding symptoms associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Apr;24(3):284-96. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fac99.
Saleh MN, Bussel JB, Cheng G, Meyer O, Bailey CK, Arning M, Brainsky A; EXTEND Study Group. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia: results of the long-term, open-label EXTEND study. Blood. 2013 Jan 17;121(3):537-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-425512. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
Fogarty PF, Tarantino MD, Brainsky A, Signorovitch J, Grotzinger KM. Selective validation of the WHO Bleeding Scale in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644849. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
Signorovitch J, Brainsky A, Grotzinger KM. Validation of the FACIT-fatigue subscale, selected items from FACT-thrombocytopenia, and the SF-36v2 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1737-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9912-9. Epub 2011 May 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRA105325
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.