Intravenous Mepolizumab In Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

NCT ID: NCT00358449

Last Updated: 2018-07-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-11

Study Completion Date

2008-11-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of intravenous mepolizumab in pediatric subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oesophagitis, Eosinophilic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg

Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mepolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg

Participants received mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mepolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg

Participants received mepolizumab 10 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mepolizumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mepolizumab

Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subject signs and dates a written assent form (age appropriate) and the parent/guardian signs and dates a written informed consent form prior to the initiation of any study-related activities, including discontinuation of any prohibited medications.
* Male or female subjects aged 2 to 17 years (from 2nd birthday up to and not including 18th birthday), who weigh \<=84.9kg (males)/ \<= 72.5 (females) and who have a BMI between 5 and 85% for age, who speak, read and write English as age appropriate and/or parent/guardian.

NOTE: If subject is within weight requirements but close to the upper or lower limits at screening and the investigator anticipates that during the study the subject's weight will change a become outside the weight requirements, the subject should be excluded from the study.

* To be eligible for entry in the treatment group of the study, a female subject is eligible to enter the study if she is: not pregnant or nursing; of non-childbearing potential. Non-childbearing potential is defined as a pre-menarcheal female who has not yet entered puberty as evidenced by lack of breast development (palpable glandular breast tissue); or a female who has documentation (medical report verification) of hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy; of childbearing potential. These females subjects must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening visit, and agree to consistent and correct use of one of the acceptable methods of birth control from at least the commencement of their last normal period prior to the first dose of study medication and to continue until the first normal period after treatment or after the Week 24 Follow-up visit, whichever is longest.
* The subject has a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis and current evidence on biopsy of isolated eosinophilic esophagitis defined as:
* Peak esophageal eosinophil counts (highest count of eosinophils per HPF in at least one of all esophageal sites biopsied) of 20 or more eosinophils in a minimum of one HPF at 400X magnification on histology of esophageal biopsies from distal and mid-esophagus within two weeks of commencing study medication, as determined by the central histopathologist.
* Inadequate response to or intolerant of therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis
* The individual investigators will apply their clinical judgment to define whether a clinical response to therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis is inadequate. As guidance, inadequate response might consist of persistence under current or recent prior therapy, of symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis such as eosinophilic esophagitis-related pain in stomach, chest or throat; regurgitation; vomiting; pain or difficulties associated with drinking fluids or nutritional supplements; or pain or difficulties associated with eating. An inadequate response might also consist of persistent eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus, in the presence or in the absence of eosinophilic esophagitis-related symptoms.
* Similarly, the individual investigators will apply their clinical judgment to define whether a patient is intolerant to therapy. For guidance, intolerance to therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis may consist of undesirable side-effects of long-term therapy; or side-effects of long-term therapy that are difficult to manage; or marked non-compliance to therapy or rejection of therapy by the individual patient, or by the parent/guardian, which in the opinion of the investigator interferes with the patient's optimal disease management.
* The criteria used by the investigator to define inadequate response to or intolerance of therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis will be collected in the CRF.

Exclusion Criteria

* Current evidence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal enteropathy (EGID), other than eosinophilic esophagitis.
* Evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, or other causes of esophagitis which in the investigator's opinion is the predominant cause of the subject's esophageal eosinophilia so that the investigator's opinion is allowed.
* Current presence, or history of (anytime in the past): hypereosinophilic syndromes, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, allergic drug reaction as the cause of the peripheral eosinophilia, graft-versus host disease, chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorders (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, chronic granulomatous disease).
* Current evidence, or history of celiac disease.
* Current evidence of active H. pylori infection.
* Abnormal 12-lead ECG at Screening which is clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Use or administration of any of the prohibited medications from Screening and throughout completion of Week 34 follow-up. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Failure to remain on a stable dose of one (or more) permitted medication(s) for at least 1 month prior to the Screening visit and throughout completion of Week 24 follow-up assessments. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Failure to remain on stable elemental diet or dietary manipulations for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit and throughout completion of Week 34 follow-up assessments. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Known history of allergic reaction to previous antibody therapy.
* Any previous treatment with anti-hIL-5, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody or other biological agents.
* Use of an investigational drug within 30 days of entering the study. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Exhibits evidence of renal disease or serum creatinine \> 1.5 times upper limit of normal range (ULN). Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Exhibits evidence of hepatic disease, impairment or abnormal liver function test i.e. AST, ALT \>1.5 times ULN, bilirubin \>1.5 times ULN. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Known evidence of the following infections/infestations: HIV, Hepatitis B or C, Bacterial infection, Parasitic infestation.
* History or suspicion of current drug abuse and alcohol abuse within the last 6 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Watford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Assa'ad AH, Gupta SK, Collins MH, Thomson M, Heath AT, Smith DA, Perschy TL, Jurgensen CH, Ortega HG, Aceves SS. An antibody against IL-5 reduces numbers of esophageal intraepithelial eosinophils in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2011 Nov;141(5):1593-604. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.044. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21835135 (View on PubMed)

Wong ECL, Gleave AL, Marshall JK, Narula N. Predictors of histologic response to mepolizumab in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct 1;35(10):1131-1136. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002623. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37577798 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Clinical Study Report

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Annotated Case Report Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Dataset Specification

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEE103219

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.