Intravenous Mepolizumab In Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT ID: NCT00358449
Last Updated: 2018-07-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-09-11
2008-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mepo for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Study
NCT03656380
An Evaluation Of Mepolizumab In Therapy Of Eosinophilic Oesophagitis In Adult Patients
NCT00274703
Efficacy and Safety Study of Reslizumab to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Subjects Aged 5 to 18 Years
NCT00538434
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Mepolizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Children
NCT02377427
A Study of Lirentelimab (AK002) in Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT04322708
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg
Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
mepolizumab
Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg
Participants received mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
mepolizumab
Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg
Participants received mepolizumab 10 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
mepolizumab
Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mepolizumab
Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg), 2.5 mg/kg , or 10 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female subjects aged 2 to 17 years (from 2nd birthday up to and not including 18th birthday), who weigh \<=84.9kg (males)/ \<= 72.5 (females) and who have a BMI between 5 and 85% for age, who speak, read and write English as age appropriate and/or parent/guardian.
NOTE: If subject is within weight requirements but close to the upper or lower limits at screening and the investigator anticipates that during the study the subject's weight will change a become outside the weight requirements, the subject should be excluded from the study.
* To be eligible for entry in the treatment group of the study, a female subject is eligible to enter the study if she is: not pregnant or nursing; of non-childbearing potential. Non-childbearing potential is defined as a pre-menarcheal female who has not yet entered puberty as evidenced by lack of breast development (palpable glandular breast tissue); or a female who has documentation (medical report verification) of hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy; of childbearing potential. These females subjects must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening visit, and agree to consistent and correct use of one of the acceptable methods of birth control from at least the commencement of their last normal period prior to the first dose of study medication and to continue until the first normal period after treatment or after the Week 24 Follow-up visit, whichever is longest.
* The subject has a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis and current evidence on biopsy of isolated eosinophilic esophagitis defined as:
* Peak esophageal eosinophil counts (highest count of eosinophils per HPF in at least one of all esophageal sites biopsied) of 20 or more eosinophils in a minimum of one HPF at 400X magnification on histology of esophageal biopsies from distal and mid-esophagus within two weeks of commencing study medication, as determined by the central histopathologist.
* Inadequate response to or intolerant of therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis
* The individual investigators will apply their clinical judgment to define whether a clinical response to therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis is inadequate. As guidance, inadequate response might consist of persistence under current or recent prior therapy, of symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis such as eosinophilic esophagitis-related pain in stomach, chest or throat; regurgitation; vomiting; pain or difficulties associated with drinking fluids or nutritional supplements; or pain or difficulties associated with eating. An inadequate response might also consist of persistent eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus, in the presence or in the absence of eosinophilic esophagitis-related symptoms.
* Similarly, the individual investigators will apply their clinical judgment to define whether a patient is intolerant to therapy. For guidance, intolerance to therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis may consist of undesirable side-effects of long-term therapy; or side-effects of long-term therapy that are difficult to manage; or marked non-compliance to therapy or rejection of therapy by the individual patient, or by the parent/guardian, which in the opinion of the investigator interferes with the patient's optimal disease management.
* The criteria used by the investigator to define inadequate response to or intolerance of therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis will be collected in the CRF.
Exclusion Criteria
* Evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, or other causes of esophagitis which in the investigator's opinion is the predominant cause of the subject's esophageal eosinophilia so that the investigator's opinion is allowed.
* Current presence, or history of (anytime in the past): hypereosinophilic syndromes, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, allergic drug reaction as the cause of the peripheral eosinophilia, graft-versus host disease, chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorders (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, chronic granulomatous disease).
* Current evidence, or history of celiac disease.
* Current evidence of active H. pylori infection.
* Abnormal 12-lead ECG at Screening which is clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Use or administration of any of the prohibited medications from Screening and throughout completion of Week 34 follow-up. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Failure to remain on a stable dose of one (or more) permitted medication(s) for at least 1 month prior to the Screening visit and throughout completion of Week 24 follow-up assessments. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Failure to remain on stable elemental diet or dietary manipulations for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit and throughout completion of Week 34 follow-up assessments. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Known history of allergic reaction to previous antibody therapy.
* Any previous treatment with anti-hIL-5, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody or other biological agents.
* Use of an investigational drug within 30 days of entering the study. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Exhibits evidence of renal disease or serum creatinine \> 1.5 times upper limit of normal range (ULN). Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Exhibits evidence of hepatic disease, impairment or abnormal liver function test i.e. AST, ALT \>1.5 times ULN, bilirubin \>1.5 times ULN. Note that this exclusion criterion does not apply for subjects who are considered for enrollment in the observational cohort.
* Known evidence of the following infections/infestations: HIV, Hepatitis B or C, Bacterial infection, Parasitic infestation.
* History or suspicion of current drug abuse and alcohol abuse within the last 6 months.
2 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Southfield, Michigan, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Troy, Michigan, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
London, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Watford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Assa'ad AH, Gupta SK, Collins MH, Thomson M, Heath AT, Smith DA, Perschy TL, Jurgensen CH, Ortega HG, Aceves SS. An antibody against IL-5 reduces numbers of esophageal intraepithelial eosinophils in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2011 Nov;141(5):1593-604. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.044. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Wong ECL, Gleave AL, Marshall JK, Narula N. Predictors of histologic response to mepolizumab in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct 1;35(10):1131-1136. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002623. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Individual Participant Data Set
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Study Protocol
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Clinical Study Report
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Annotated Case Report Form
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentDocument Type: Dataset Specification
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEE103219
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.