Customized Laser Ablation: Comparing Results of LADAR Vision and VISX Platforms

NCT ID: NCT00344838

Last Updated: 2018-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

458 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the results of two commercially available customized laser ablation devices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the past few years, several custom laser ablation platforms have emerged in the marketplace but only two are currently approved by the FDA. They are the LADAR CustomLasik (Alcon: Ft. Worth, TX) and the VISX Wavefront System (VISX: Santa Clara, CA). Although both use the Hartmann-Shack wave sensing principle, there are some basic distinctions in wave capture and processing technology. Moreover, there are fundamental differences in as far as centration, registration, and ablation technology is concerned. Evaluating and comparing the results of these two systems in assorted categories of patients would help us select the appropriate laser platform for the patient.

Once a patient has been scheduled to undergo customized laser ablation, they will have a routine preoperative examination. The following tests will be gathered and evaluated by the doctor in order to determine eligibility for the treatment. If the patient qualifies for custom laser ablation, this information will also be used for the study as long as they give written consent.

Pre-operative Visit (Screening visit): Date of Visit, Patient Initials, Date of Birth, Sex, Race, Assessment of visual needs, Ocular history, History of contact lens wear, Medical history, Allergies to food and drugs, Medication, family history, Distance and Near Vision (with and without correction), Auto-refraction, Refraction, eye dominance, Keratometry, Visual Acuity, Pupil size (bright and dim lighting), Afferent Pupillary Defect (ADP), Ocular motility, Ophthalmoscopy, Cycloplegic refraction, Pachymetry, Intaocular Pressure test, Custom Vue (VISX), LADARWave (LADAR), and Schirmers testing with anesthetic. Typically, these procedures are employed as part of "standard of care" for patients who are seeking custom LASIK treatment. Furthermore, there will be two additional procedures that will be performed as "reseach" measures . These are visual acuity with an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) vision chart and contrast sensitivity.

Post-Operative visits (Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12): ETDRS Visual Acuity, contrast sensitivity along with a questionnaire pertaining to the study patients visual problems and experience will be completed by the patient at week 1 and after each visit thereafter. These procedures are intended as part of research.

Additional data gathered as part of "standard of care" will include: date of visit, patient initials, visual acuity, refraction, Intraocular Pressure (discretion of physician), Custom Vue (VISX) and LADARWave. Both Custom Vue and LADAR measurements are taken at 3-month visit only!

The research project proposes to compare the results of two FDA approved laser ablation treatment methods. While both treatment modalities are considered standard of care for those who decide to perform customized laser treatment, the "comparison" is intended as part of this research project.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Customized Laser Ablation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Comparison of LADAR CustomLasik and VISX Wavefront System custom laser ablation devices

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Individuals of both genders, aged 18 and older, who have been scheduled to undergo customized laser ablation will be considered for this prospective study.

Exclusion Criteria: There are no exclusion criteria available for this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

88 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James McCulley

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James P. McCulley, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0903-556

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LASIK Using Contoura With Phorcides vs. iDesign
NCT07128316 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK
NCT05037370 RECRUITING NA