An Assessment of P-15 Bone Putty in Anterior Cervical Fusion With Instrumentation

NCT ID: NCT00310440

Last Updated: 2020-03-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

319 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-05-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this trial is to evaluate if P-15 bone putty (investigational device) is not inferior in effectiveness and safety to local autologous bone (control device) when applied in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with use of a structural allograft ring in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease..

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical treatment option for symptomatic degenerative cervical disk disease in patients who fail conservative treatment. i-FACTOR bone graft is a unique anorganic bone mineral (ABM) and small peptide, P-15™. P-15 is a synthetic fifteen amino acid polypeptide that mimics the cell-binding domain of Type I human collagen and is responsible for osteogenic cell attachment via alpha2-beta1 integrins.

This is randomized, controlled, multi-center, prospective FDA IDE study conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of i-FACTOR bone graft (Cerapedics, Inc. Westminster, CO) in patients treated with single level ACDF. Patients received i-FACTOR bone graft or local autologous bone inside a structural allograft.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervertebral Disk Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bone graft substitute

Subjects will receive anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and instrumentation (anterior plate). Structural allograft ring will be used. The cavity of the ring will be filled with P-15 synthetic osteoconductive bone substitute (investigational device).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

P-15 Synthetic osteoconductive bone substitute

Intervention Type DEVICE

Safety and efficacy of synthetic bone substitute used for fusion in spinal surgery

Autologous Bone

Subjects will receive anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and instrumentation (anterior plate). Structural allograft ring will be used. The cavity of the ring will be filled with local autologous bone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Autologous bone

Intervention Type OTHER

Local autologous bone will be harvested, milled and placed into the cavity of the structural allograft ring

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

P-15 Synthetic osteoconductive bone substitute

Safety and efficacy of synthetic bone substitute used for fusion in spinal surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Autologous bone

Local autologous bone will be harvested, milled and placed into the cavity of the structural allograft ring

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

i-Factor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 65
* Radiographically determined discogenic origin to include at least one of the following characteristics: degenerated/dark disc on MRI, decreased disc height compared to adjacent levels on radiographic film, CT, or MRI and disc herniation on CT or MRI
* Radicular symptoms by history and physical exam to include at least the following characteristics: Arm/shoulder pain, decreased flexes, decreased strength and abnormal sensation
* Pain level arm/shoulder \>4 on 0-10 VAS
* Pain level neck \>4 on 0-10 VAS
* Neck disability Index \>30
* Involved discs between C3 and C7
* Undergoing anterior cervical fusion at a single level
* Failed to gain adequate relief from non-operative treatment
* Able and willing to give consent to participate in study
* Understand and read English at elementary level

Exclusion Criteria

Systemic infection such as AIDS, HIV, and active hepatitis; Significant metabolic disease that in the surgeon's opinion might compromise bone growth such as osteoporosis or osteomalacia; Taking medication for the prevention of osteoporosis; Circulatory, cardiac, or pulmonary problems that could cause excessive surgical risk; Active malignancy; Nondiscogenic source of symptoms (e.g., tumor, etc.); Multiple level symptomatic degenerative disc disease; Previous cervical fusion; Previous cervical decompression at the same level; Acute cervical trauma or instability (i.e., subluxation \> 3 mm on flexion/extension radiographic film); Undergoing treatment for tumor or bony traumatic injury to the cervical spine; Rheumatoid disease of the cervical spine; Myelopathy; Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 2 years; Posterior cervical spine procedure scheduled; More than one level to be operated; Has a history of substance abuse (recreational drugs, alcohol); Is a prisoner; Is currently involved in a study of another investigational product for similar purpose; Has a disease process that would preclude accurate evaluation (e.g., neuromuscular disease, significant psychiatric disease).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CeraPedics, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Janssen, MD / DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Spine Education Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Neurological Surgery UCSF Spine Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Spine Education Research Institute

Thornton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Sarasota Memorial Hospital

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedics Northeast/Midwest Spine Group

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indiana Spine Group

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis Neurosurgical Group

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas University Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

New England Neurosurgical Associates, LLC

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Foothills Medical Center

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Neurological Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnold PM, Vaccaro AR, Sasso RC, Goulet B, Fehlings MG, Heary RF, Janssen ME, Kopjar B. Six-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of i-FACTOR Peptide-Enhanced Bone Graft Versus Local Autograft in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1;92(4):725-733. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002290. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36700705 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Restore CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT01609374 UNKNOWN NA