Oral Budesonide vs. Oral Mesalazine in Active Crohn's Disease (CD)
NCT ID: NCT00300118
Last Updated: 2014-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
311 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Budesonide Capsules Versus Mesalazine Granules in Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
NCT00747110
9 mg Budesonide Once Daily (OD) Versus 3 mg Budesonide Three Times Daily (TID) in Active Crohn's Disease
NCT01086553
Preventing Postoperative Relapse in Crohn's Disease Patients at Risk: Azathioprine Versus Mesalazine
NCT00946946
Budesonide Capsules vs. Mesalazine Granules vs. Placebo in Collagenous Colitis
NCT00450086
Budesonide Versus Mesalazine Versus Placebo in Lymphocytic Colitis
NCT01209208
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
So far only one trial compares the efficacy and safety of budesonide and 5-ASA. The result of this trial is that budesonide is more effective in inducing remission than mesalazine. The primary objective of this trial is to confirm this result for other presentations of budesonide and mesalazine; i.e. Budenofalk® capsules (9 mg/day) and Salofalk® tablets (Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalazine; 4.5 g/day) in moderately active Crohn's disease. Mesalazine is used in this trial as a comparator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
budesonide
9 mg
B
mesalazine
4.5 g
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
budesonide
9 mg
mesalazine
4.5 g
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Localisation of CD either in terminal ileum, ascending colon or ileocolitis
* Active phase of disease (200 \< CDAI \< 400)
Exclusion Criteria
* CD in the rectum currently present
* Short bowel syndrome
* Septic complications
* Baseline stool positive for germs causing bowel disease
* Abscess, perforation or active fistulas
* Ileostomy or colostomy
* Resection of more than 50 cm of the ileum
* Bowel surgery within the last 3 months
* Immediate surgery required
* Clinical signs of stricturing disease
* Subileus within the last 6 months
* Suspicion of ileus, subileus or corresponding symptomatology
* Contra-indications, special warnings and precautions mentioned in SmPC
* Treatment with immunosuppressants, cytostatics, 6-TG, methotrexate, or cyclosporine within the last 3 months; in case of treatment with azathioprine or 6-MP the drugs have to be used for maintenance of remission only and dosage has to be unchanged within the last 3 months before baseline visit and during the study
* Treatment with ketoconazole, ciprofloxacin or other CYP3A inhibitors within the last month before baseline visit
* Treatment with anti-TNF-a therapy within 6 months before baseline visit
* Conventional steroids (iv, po, rectal) within 2 weeks before the study
* \> 6 mg/d budesonide po or \> 3 g/d mesalazine po within 2 weeks before the study
* Patients known to be steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent from former CD episodes
* Treatment of study disease with oral antibiotics (e.g., metronidazole) within the last 2 weeks
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Tromm, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ev. Krankenhaus Hattingen GmbH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ev. Krankenhaus Hattingen GmbH
Hattingen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tromm A, Bunganic I, Tomsova E, Tulassay Z, Lukas M, Kykal J, Batovsky M, Fixa B, Gabalec L, Safadi R, Kramm HJ, Altorjay I, Lohr H, Koutroubakis I, Bar-Meir S, Stimac D, Schaffeler E, Glasmacher C, Dilger K, Mohrbacher R, Greinwald R; International Budenofalk Study Group. Budesonide 9 mg is at least as effective as mesalamine 4.5 g in patients with mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2011 Feb;140(2):425-434.e1; quiz e13-4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2004-001213-34
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BUC-52/CDA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.