A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab (CNTO 148) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Previously Treated With Biologic Anti-TNFa Agent(s)

NCT ID: NCT00299546

Last Updated: 2014-02-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

461 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (CNTO 148) in subjects who have active rheumatoid arthritis and have been treated previously with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Golimumab is a fully human protein (antibody) which binds to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFa). TNFa is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and plays a major role in causing the joint pain, swelling and damage from RA. Other marketed drugs that target TNFa (anti-TNFa drugs) have been shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms, signs and joint damage of RA, but have limitations with respect to safety and ease of use. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a new anti-TNFa drug, golimumab, at 2 doses, injected under the skin every 4 weeks in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least 1 dose of a biologic anti-TNFa agent (etanercept, adalimumab or infliximab). Concomitant therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine is permitted if the subject has tolerated these medications for at least 12 weeks prior to the first administration of study drug and is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent. The study hypothesis is that golimumab will be a safe and effective treatment for RA in subjects with active RA previously treated with at least one biologic anti-TNFa agent as measured by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria, the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) responses and the change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), without causing unacceptable significant adverse effects. The ACR response criteria were designed to assess the level of improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA. The DAS28 responses also measure improvement in the signs and symptoms of RA using the joint examination and laboratory testing. The HAQ is a series of questions that measure a subject's impairment in physical function caused by RA. Patients will receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg or placebo injections under the skin every 4 weeks until Week 24. After Week 24, all subjects receive golimumab 50 mg or 100 mg injections, and golimumab continues for all groups every 4 weeks for about 4 and a half more years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: Placebo

Placebo Subcutaneous (SC) injections every 4 weeks (wks) thru Wk 20 (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 50 mg SC injections from Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - 50 mg SC injections beginning Wk 24 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape); Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

SC injections

Golimumab 50 mg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

SC injections

Group 2: Golimumab 50 mg

Golimumab 50 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs (unless early escape at Wk 16); Golimumab - if early escape, 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks beginning Wk 16 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 50 to 100 mg and from 100 to 50mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Golimumab 50 mg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

SC injections

Group 3: Golimumab 100 mg

Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 wks from Wk 0 up to 5 yrs; Golimumab - Dr's discretion after unblinding, dose adjusted from 100 to 50 mg. Duration of the blinded period will be until the week-24 database lock.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Golimumab 100 mg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

SC injections

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

SC injections

Intervention Type DRUG

Golimumab 50 mg

SC injections

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Golimumab 100 mg

SC injections

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients have a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (according to the revised 1987 criteria of the ACR) for at least 3 months prior to screening
* Have active RA as defined by persistent disease activity with at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints, at the time of screening and baseline
* Must have been previously treated with at least one dose of etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab
* If currently using methotrexate, sulfasalazine and/or hydroxychloroquine must have tolerated these agents for at least 12 weeks and be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
* If using NSAIDs or other analgesics must be on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to the first administration of study agent
* If using oral corticosteroids must be on a stable dose equivalent to \<= 10 mg of prednisone/day for at least 2 weeks prior to first administration of study agent
* Are considered eligible according to specified tuberculosis (TB) screening criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients cannot have other inflammatory diseases other than RA that might interfere with the evaluation of the benefit of golimumab therapy
* No history of treatment with natalizumab, rituximab or cytotoxic agents
* No history of demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis or of concurrent congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphoproliferative disease, known malignancy or history of malignancy within the previous 5 years (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence)
* No history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease
* No serious infection within 2 months prior to first administration of study agent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schering-Plough

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centocor, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Centocor, Inc. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centocor, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Paradise Valley, Arizona, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Moline, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Witchita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mayfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Brookfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Racine, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Cotton Tree, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Lainz/Wien N/A, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Claire, , Canada

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Hyvinkää, , Finland

Site Status

Jyvalskyla, , Finland

Site Status

Baden-Baden, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Vogelsang-Gommern, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Rotorua, , New Zealand

Site Status

Timaru, , New Zealand

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Canada Finland Germany Netherlands New Zealand Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vieira MC, Zwillich SH, Jansen JP, Smiechowski B, Spurden D, Wallenstein GV. Tofacitinib Versus Biologic Treatments in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: Results From a Network Meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2628-2641.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27889300 (View on PubMed)

Kay J, Fleischmann R, Keystone E, Hsia EC, Hsu B, Zhou Y, Goldstein N, Braun J. Five-year Safety Data from 5 Clinical Trials of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;43(12):2120-2130. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160420. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27803138 (View on PubMed)

Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle M, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Gaylis N, Wollenhaupt J, Murphy FT, Xu S, Zhou Y, Hsia EC. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors: findings with up to five years of treatment in the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 GO-AFTER study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jan 22;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0516-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25627338 (View on PubMed)

Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, Gaylis N, Murphy FT, Neal JS, Zhou Y, Visvanathan S, Hsia EC, Rahman MU; GO-AFTER study investigators. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):210-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60506-7. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19560810 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C0524T11

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR006334

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

INCB047986 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT02151474 TERMINATED PHASE2