COLOR II: Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectal Cancer Removal

NCT ID: NCT00297791

Last Updated: 2024-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1044 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

COLOR II is a randomized, international, multi center study comparing the outcomes of laparoscopic and conventional resection of rectal carcinoma below 15 cm with curative intent. Clinical and operative data will be collected centrally in the coordinating centre in Halifax, Canada. Quality of life and costs will be assessed on a national basis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The design involves allocation of all suitable consecutive patients with rectal carcinoma to either of the two procedures at a randomization ratio of 2:1 in favor of the laparoscopic procedure. Excluded are patients with a carcinoma treated by local resection and palliative resections. The trial will be stratified according to participating centre, resection type, and preoperative radiotherapy.

If the 95% CI for the difference of the 3-year locoregional recurrence rates excludes a difference greater than 5% in favor of the conventional procedure, non-inferiority of the laparoscopic procedure will be concluded. Assuming both rates are 10%, 1000 evaluable cases are required in total for a power of 80%.

Analysis will be primarily on an intention to treat basis. Definition of conversion is defined by protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

surgery (open or laparoscopic) and observation

Group Type OTHER

surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

randomized to open or laparoscopic technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

surgery

randomized to open or laparoscopic technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

observation following intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* solitary rectal cancer observed at colonoscopy or on barium X-ray
* no evidence of distant metastases
* distal border of the tumor within 15 cm of the anal verge at rigid rectoscopy or under linea conjugata at lateral barium enema radiography
* suitable for elective surgical resection
* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* T1 tumors treated by locl excision
* T4 tumors
* patients under 18 years of age
* signs of acute intestinal obstruction
* more than one colorectal tumor
* Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis, Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer
* active crohn's or active ulcerative colitis
* scheduled need for other synchronous colon surgery
* preoperative indication of invasion of adjacent organs, immobile at palpation or CT showing invasion
* preoperative evidence of metastases (at least chest X-ray and liver ultrasound)
* other malignancies in medical history except adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri
* absolute contraindications to general anesthesia or prolonged pneumoperitoneum (ASA class \> III)
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nova Scotia Health Authority

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaap Bonjer, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dalhousie University, and VUMC, the Netherlands

Marius Hoogerboord

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenjuis Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

CDHA/ Dalhousie University

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

University of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Aalborg Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

SVS Esbjerg

Esbjerg, , Denmark

Site Status

Amtssygehus i Gentofte

Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Hilleröd Hospital

Hilleröd, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense Universitetshospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Roskilde Hospital

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Viborg

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Klinikum Großhadern

München, , Germany

Site Status

Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Regensburg

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Marienhospital

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Wuerzburg University

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Academisch Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

VU Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rijnland Ziekenhuis

Leiderdorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus Medical Centre

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Medisch Centrum Rijnmond-Zuid

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Jagiellonian University

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Korea University Anam Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Hospital Clinic i Provencial de Barcelona

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital S.A.S. de Jerez

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Sureste de Madrid

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Arrixaca Hospital Universitario

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro Hospital

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Kärnsjukhuset

Skvöde, , Sweden

Site Status

Ersta Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uddevalla Hospital

Uddevalla, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Canada Denmark Germany Netherlands Poland South Korea Spain Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E. Developing a multivariable prediction model of global health-related quality of life in patients treated for rectal cancer: a prospective study in five countries. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar 5;39(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04605-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38441657 (View on PubMed)

Koedam TWA, Bootsma BT, Deijen CL, van de Brug T, Kazemier G, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Haglind E, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Bonjer HJ; on behalf of the COLOR COLOR II study group. Oncological Outcomes After Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer: Increased Risk of Local Recurrence. Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e420-e427. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003889.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32224742 (View on PubMed)

Petersson J, Koedam TW, Bonjer HJ, Andersson J, Angenete E, Bock D, Cuesta MA, Deijen CL, Furst A, Lacy AM, Rosenberg J, Haglind E; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) II Study Group. Bowel Obstruction and Ventral Hernia After Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer in A Randomized Trial (COLOR II). Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):53-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002790.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29746337 (View on PubMed)

Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25830422 (View on PubMed)

Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E. Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1272-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9550. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24924798 (View on PubMed)

Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angeras U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Furst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):941-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9144.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23640671 (View on PubMed)

van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23395398 (View on PubMed)

Color II Study Group; Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Haglind E, Kurlberg G, Rosenberg J, Lacy AM, Cuesta MA, D'Hoore A, Furst A, Lange JF, Jess P, Bulut O, Poornoroozy P, Jensen KJ, Christensen MM, Lundhus E, Ovesen H, Birch D, Iesalnieks I, Jager C, Kreis M, van riet Y, van der Harst E, Gerhards MF, Bemelman WA, Hansson BM, Neijenhuis PA, Prins HA, Balague C, Targarona E, Lujan Mompean JA, Franco Osorio JD, Garcia Molina FJ, Skullman S, Lackberg Z, Kressner U, Matthiessen P, Kim SH, Poza AA. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull. 2009 May;56(2):89-91.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19486621 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDHA007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.