Cholecalciferol Versus Doxercalciferol in the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease

NCT ID: NCT00285467

Last Updated: 2016-05-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The majority of patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stages 3 and 4) develop secondary hyperparathyroidism (2°HPT), but the optimal therapy to control hyperparathyroidism in this group is unknown. The National Kidney Foundation presented guidelines in 2003 recommending vitamin D supplementation for vitamin D insufficient patients and active vitamin D therapy in patients with sufficient levels. These guidelines are based on opinion since there are no significant trials to determine if vitamin D supplementation is effective in this population. The active vitamin D metabolites doxercalciferol, paricalcitol, and calcitriol have been shown to effectively suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH), but have not been compared with vitamin D supplementation with a calciferol (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol). Beyond hyperparathyroidism, small studies suggest vitamin D replacement in vitamin D insufficient non-CKD subjects result in improved pain, feeling of well being, blood pressure and strength. In this proposed study we wish to directly compare the effectiveness of cholecalciferol versus doxercalciferol in suppressing elevated PTH levels in subjects with CKD not on dialysis who have vitamin D insufficiency in a three month study. Secondary endpoints will be change in blood pressure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with CKD stage 3 were randomly allocated (by blinded group allocation) to either cholecalciferol (4000 U per day for one month then 2000 IU daily thereafter) or doxercalciferol (2.5 mcg po daily. Assessments for blood endpoints (primary end point PTH; secondary calcium, phosphorus) were done monthly. Other assessments (blood pressure) were done at baseline and at 3 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Osteodystrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Doxercalciferol

doxercalciferol 1 mcg capsule orally daily for 3 months. This is a form of vitamin D that does not require activation by enzymes in the liver and kidney.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

doxercalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

form of vitamin D that is already in active form.

Cholecalciferol

cholecalciferol 4000 IU capsule orally daily for one month, then 2000 IU capsule daily orally for 2 months. this form of vitamin D requires activation by cells of the body.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

from of vitamin D that requires cells in the body to make active

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

doxercalciferol

form of vitamin D that is already in active form.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cholecalciferol

from of vitamin D that requires cells in the body to make active

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hectoral vitamin D3

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18 years old or older, male or female
* able to sign informed consent
* CKD stage 3 (GFR 30-59 ml/min) or stage 4 (15-29 ml/min)
* intact Parathyroid hormone level (iPTH) \> 100 pg/ml for stage 3 or iPTH \> 150 pg/ml for stage 4
* calcidiol levels ≤ 20 ng/ml
* ability to ambulate without assistance

Exclusion Criteria

* intact PTH \> 400 pg/ml
* initial corrected Calcium \> 9.7 mg/dl
* initial serum Phosphorous \> 5.0 mg/dl
* initial standardized blood pressure of \> 160/100
* history of significant liver disease or cirrhosis
* anticipated requirement for dialysis in 6 months
* malabsorption, severe chronic diarrhea, or ileostomy
* no calcimimetic or active vitamin D therapy 30 days prior to enrollment
* use of digoxin, magnesium containing products, mineral oil, or cholestyramine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

82 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sharon Moe, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Indiana University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Moe SM, Saifullah A, LaClair RE, Usman SA, Yu Z. A randomized trial of cholecalciferol versus doxercalciferol for lowering parathyroid hormone in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Feb;5(2):299-306. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07131009. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20056760 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0508-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DePTH: De-emphasize PTH
NCT06288451 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
The Effect of Etelcalcetide on CKD-MBD
NCT03960437 COMPLETED PHASE2