Vitamin D and Carboxy PTH Fragments in Coronary Calcification
NCT ID: NCT00502268
Last Updated: 2020-12-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-02-29
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The type of vascular calcification associated with diabetes and ESRD is histologically distinct from that found in atherosclerotic plaques. In patients with CKD or diabetes calcium deposits are concentric and uniformly distributed within the medial layer of the vessel wall. The deposition of calcium does not require the presence of atherosclerotic lesions and occurs in the absence of intimal hyperplasia. Infiltration of the adventia by T cells and activated macrophages leads to expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and osteopontin (OPN) by pericytic myofibroblasts. In diabetics, BMP-2 expression is enhanced by the simultaneous upregulation of two BMP-2 associated transcription factors Msx1 and Msx2 3. The resulting transcription of BMP-2 genes leads to mineralization of non-endochondrial matrix. The expression of OPN is a consistent feature of medial calcification 4. Osteopontin or "bone bridge" is a highly phosphorylated glycoprotein that binds calcium and integrin receptors. The expression of osteopontin can be stimulated by vitamin D and increased circulating levels of phosphate.
Moreover, physiologic concentrations of 1, 25, dihydroxyvitamin D increases calcium deposition in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and is associated with reduced expression of PTH related peptide (1-34 PTH) suggesting that amino PTH fragments are not only involved in regulating bone turnover, but also function to prevent dystrophic vascular calcification. Indeed, these observations raise the question of whether carboxy PTH fragments can accelerate vascular calcification.
Because second generation PTH assays detect both 1-84 and 7-84 PTH fragments, the use of vitamin D analogues to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism could lead to excessive suppression of 1-84 and a preponderance of carboxy PTH fragments. As observed by Jono et.al accumulation of 7-84 could contribute to excessive vascular calcification. We hypothesize that limiting the accumulation of 7-84 PTH fragments by maintaining a 1-84/7-84 ratio above 1.6 will reduce the amount of vitamin D analogues administered and ultimately reduce the development of coronary calcification. To investigate this hypothesis, we propose to prospectively treat 50 patients with 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D2 where doses are determined by maintaining a 1-84/7-84 ration \> 1.6 or by maintaining intact PTH levels between 150-350 pg/ml using existing second generation PTH assays.
4.0 Hypothesis \& Objectives
4.1 Hypothesis #1: Clinical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in new hemodialysis patients using the Scantibodies 1-84/7-84 PTH ratio for one year will reduce the amount of Vitamin D administration resulting in reduced coronary calcification compared to patients in which PTH management is accomplished by conventional, second generation PTH assay.
4.1a Specific Aim #1 Specific Aim #1 will compare the amount of coronary calcification and the percentage of patients with at least one coronary lesion \> 50% luminal obstruction at baseline and after one-year therapy following randomization to one of two treatment groups.
\[Group 1\] Patients randomized to group 1 will have the administration of 1alpha OH vitamin D2 (Hectorol) targeted to achieve serum PTH levels between 150-300 ng/ml using a Bayer Centaur iPTH assay.
\[Group 2\] Patients randomized to group 2 will have the administration of vitamin D analogues targeted to achieve a ratio of 1-84/7-84 PTH fragments between ranges of 1.4-1.6 using the Scantibodies IRMA PTH assay. (Hectorol).
Rationale: Coronary calcification is a frequent complication of end stage renal disease (ESRD) with recent estimates of up to 80% of chronic hemodialysis patients exhibiting moderate to severe vascular calcification 1. Numerous clinical factors have been associated with the development of arterial calcification including hyperphosphatemia 2, diabetes mellitus 3 and calcium containing phosphate binders 4. More recently, the increased use of vitamin D analogues to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism has been implicated as a major contributor to vascular calcification among ESRD patients.
These clinical practices are complicated by the observation that carboxy fragments of PTH (e.g. 7-84) cross react with second generation PTH assays. Because carboxy PTH fragments are either inert or antagonize functional bio-intact PTH (1-84), clinicians have used excessive doses of vitamin D analogues to regulate PTH levels. Moreover, there are animal model studies that suggest that carboxy PTH fragments directly contribute to vascular calcification 16.We propose that clinical decision making using the incomplete information provided the currently available second generation PTH assays leads to excessive vitamin D administration and subsequent acceleration of coronary calcification.
Anticipated Results: We anticipate that prolonged (1 year) management of PTH levels using a second generation of PTH assays will lead to an increase in the total administered dose of vitamin D analogues. Moreover, this increase in vitamin D administration will result in increased coronary calcification at the end of one year of therapy. Conversely, maintaining a 1-84/7-84 PTH ratio between 1.4-1.6 using the Scantibodies third generation assay will reduce the amount of administered vitamin D analogues and subsequently reduce the amount of coronary calcification at one year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Doxercalciferol administration by DOQI and 2nd Gen PTH assay
Doxercalciferol administration
Doxercalciferol administration
Group 2
Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84 ratio between 1.4-1.6
Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Doxercalciferol administration
Doxercalciferol administration
Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Doxercalciferol administered by 1-84-7-84
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients receiving outpatient hemodialysis for \> 3 or \<24 months duration
3. Patients must have baseline coronary calcification defined as at one ROI (regions of interest with \>130 Hounsfield units) in 1 or more coronary vessels
4. Patients must have a stable dose of phosphate binder for 30 days prior to study enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients on peritoneal dialysis
3. Patients with a previous parathyroidectomy
4. Patients with dry weight \> 300 lbs
5. Patients with chronic atrial flutter or fibrillation
6. Patients receiving chronic coumadin therapy
7. Patients with known allergies to contrast dyes
8. Patients receiving current Cinacalcet therapy or during previous 30 days
9. Patients unable to take Metoprolol therapy
10. Patients with resting heart rate \>100 and unresponsive to beta blockade
11. Patients with known pregnancy or unwilling to use contraception during the course of the study
12. Patients unable to tolerate the confines of CT scanner
13. Patients with a renal transplant within the previous 5 years
14. Patients with known aluminum toxicity
15. Patients undergoing recent PTCA or CABG within the previous 12 months
16. Patients with ESRD secondary to Sarcoidosis
17. Patients unwilling to use Selevamer as a primary phosphate binder
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Southeast Renal Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James A. Tumlin MD
Nurse
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James A. Tumlin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Southeast Renal Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Davita East Charlotte Dialysis Unit
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SBPTH-CC1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id