A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Bone Density Decision Aide

NCT ID: NCT00285168

Last Updated: 2012-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is being conducted to determine if a modified bone mineral density (BMD) test report that contains additional fracture risk information will be a useful physician decision aide in selecting patients for pharmacological osteoporosis therapy. It is hypothesized that this supplementary information, provided in addition to the conventional BMD report, will increase the likelihood that patients at high risk for an osteoporotic fracture will receive prescribed therapy for osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This observational research study is being conducted to determine if a modified bone mineral density (BMD) test report that contains additional fracture risk information will be a useful physician decision aide in selecting patients for pharmacological osteoporosis therapy. It is hypothesized that this supplementary information, provided in addition to the conventional BMD report, will increase the likelihood that patients at high risk for an osteoporotic fracture will receive prescribed therapy for osteoporosis. Physicians who only receive the conventional BMD reports without the supplemental information will be the control group.

To compare the rates of pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in post-menopausal women, family / primary care physicians are randomized to receive either:(i) a conventional BMD report (absolute bone density, T-score result, Z-score result, qualitative statement indicating the BMD results classification of risk for fracture from osteoporosis according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria) versus (ii) a conventional BMD report plus a supplemental information sheet (all the information contained in the conventional BMD report plus five-year estimated risks for future fractures calculated from the physician-supplied clinical risk factors and - for those who have osteoporosis according to the WHO criteria - the number needed to treat (in person years) to prevent one fracture.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Osteoporosis Fractures, Bone Bone Mineral Density

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1 - Control

Usual Bone Density Report

No interventions assigned to this group

2 - Intervention

Bone Density Report with Absolute 10-year Fracture Risk Decision Aide

Bone Density Decision Aide

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Absolute 10-year Fracture Risk Report

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bone Density Decision Aide

Absolute 10-year Fracture Risk Report

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* physicians involved in referring patients for DXA bone density testing

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

William D. Leslie

Professor of Medicine and Radiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William D Leslie, MD FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manitoba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H2003:099

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id