Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2006-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Antioxidants are vitamins and other nutrients that help to decrease inflammation in the body by stopping free radicals or oxidants. Common antioxidants include vitamins E, C, and A, beta-carotene, and glutathione. Some doctors who treat cancer are now using antioxidants with chemotherapy while others believe they should not be used with cancer treatment.
The purpose of this study is to try and understand if it is safe efficacious to add antioxidant nutritional supplements to traditional chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy during the treatment of cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer With Antioxidants
NCT00228319
Docetaxel in Treating Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Advanced Gynecologic Cancer
NCT00287885
Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities In Ovarian Cancer Patients
NCT00508378
Glutathione in Preventing Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, and/or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
NCT02311907
Efficacy and Safety of PEG-rhG-CSF Secondary Prophylaxis vs. Therapeutic Administration in Patients With Ovarian Cancer
NCT03858166
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is an open label prospective investigational study in 50 gynecologic cancer patients with a Primary Hypothesis: To assess safety of adding high-dose antioxidants to chemotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies (uterine, cervical, or epithelial ovarian). Qualitative and quantitative toxicities will be assessed by monitoring clinical status by National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria version 3.0, quality of life measures (FACT-G), and evaluating metabolic functions including but not limited to hepatic and renal function.
Secondary Hypothesis: To assess efficacy by tumor response rates in patients with gynecologic malignancies treated with antioxidants to include intravenous and oral ascorbic acid, intravenous glutathione, oral mixed carotenoids, mixed tocopherols, and vitamin A. Secondary endpoints will be time to progression and survival.
Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent gynecologic cancer will be invited to participate and these subjects will be limited to those who present with cervical, uterine, or ovarian of epithelial origin. Fifty patients will be enrolled. The study subjects will be treated with antioxidants added to their usual oncologic care for 12 months. This population was chosen because of anecdotal and case report evidence for benefit when high-dose antioxidants are added to their care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Vitamin C
vitamin C
IV Vitamin C given 2-3 times a week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
vitamin C
IV Vitamin C given 2-3 times a week
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient must screened for eligibility and have care approved by treating oncologist; the oncology care is to be dictated by the oncology team.
* Patients must be of ambulatory status without evidence of active brain metastasis or spinal cord compression.
* ECOG Performance Status 0-2. (Grade 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction Grade 1= Restricted in physical strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature e.g. light housework, office work Grade 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours.
* Laboratory: ANC =1,500/mm3, Hemoglobin \> 8g/dL, platelet = 1000,000/mm3, total bilirubin = 1.5 mg/dL, creatinine =2.0 mg/dL, transaminase (AST/ALT) =2.5X upper limit, urine uric acid \< 1,000mg/d, urine pH \<6, urine oxalate \<60 mg/d.
* Willingness to take oral nutrients and answer FACT-G QOL questionnaires
* Patients who have no language barrier, are cooperative, and can give informed consent before entering the study after being informed of the medications and procedures to be used in this study may participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Ovarian tumors: sarcomas, germ cell, or any atypical cell line other than epithelial
* History of oxalate renal calculi; urine oxalate level \> 60 mg/d at baseline
* History of bleeding disorder or hemochromatosis
* Patients undergoing radiation therapy
* Patients enrolled in other trials currently or in the preceding 3 months.
* Patients with evidence of a significant psychiatric disorder by history/examination that would prevent completion of the study will not be allowed to participate.
* ECOG Performance Status of 3-4. (Grade 3 = Capable of only limited self care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self care. Totally confined to bed or chair.)
* Co-morbid condition that would affect survival: end stage congestive heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction within 6 weeks of study, uncontrolled blood sugars = 300 mg/dL, patients with known chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis.
* Patients who consume an excess of alcohol or abuse drugs (an excess of alcohol is defined as more than four of any one of the following per day: 30mL distilled spirits, 340mL beer, or 120mL wine) will not be allowed.
* Patients who smoke tobacco products will not be allowed to participate. Of note, patients who continue or begin to smoke are not allowed to continue with the protocol because we are unable to achieve elevation of the plasma vitamin C level to the desired 400 mg/dL. (Unless 400 mg/dL plasma level is achieved, there is no (presumed) chemotherapeutic action of the high-dose intravenous ascorbate). The inability to achieve the desired plasma level of ascorbate is presumably related to increased oxidative stress from the smoking itself. Patients will be clearly made aware of the possibility of coming off of protocol if they smoke. We will monitor cotinine levels (nicotine metabolite) in suspected smokers.
* Patients who are unwilling to take the oral antioxidants will not be allowed to participate.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Kansas Medical Center
OTHER
Jeanne Drisko, MD, CNS, FACN
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeanne Drisko, MD, CNS, FACN
Director Integrative Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeanne Drisko, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kansas Medical Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.