Why do Oral Contraceptives Prevent Ovarian Cancer?

NCT ID: NCT02155777

Last Updated: 2020-06-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. We are proposing here to directly study the effect of OCs on the fallopian tube and inclusion cysts within the ovary - sites from which most ovarian cancers are thought to arise - in order to better understand the mechanistic basis for OC protection against ovarian cancer. We think the protection results from reduced cell proliferation. It will lay the foundation for further studies to ensure that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by 'traditional' OCs is not lost with alterations in OC formulation, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Five-year survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (ovarian cancer) is less than 50% because most women are diagnosed at an advanced stage. However, there is an effective chemoprevention strategy. Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies shows an approximately 40% reduction in risk of ovarian cancer with 5 years of oral contraceptive (OC) use. The protective effect increases significantly with duration of OC use and continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped. The mechanism(s) underlying this protective effect are not understood. One hypothesis is that protection is achieved by blocking ovulation, but growing evidence suggests that it may be related to promoting a favorable progestagenic environment. OC use would protect if the hormonal exposure while on OCs was less stimulatory to the possibly different types of cells of origin of ovarian cancer than the hormonal exposure in normal ovulatory cycles. Exposure to progestins is higher while on OCs than in normal cycling and this could explain the protective effect. We propose that a major source of the protection from OC use is due to their significantly reducing cell proliferation in the fallopian tube fimbriae (FTF) and in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts (CICs), two likely cells of origin for ovarian cancer. Proliferating cell populations are more susceptible to carcinogenic effects with the rise in cancer risk with cell proliferation being secondary to increased chances of mutation and progression. FTF proliferation has been reported to be almost confined to the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle with virtually no proliferation within a few days after ovulation and our preliminary data show the same pattern - OCs could thus protect against ovarian cancers arising in the FTF by mimicking the luteal phase of the cycle when progesterone exposure is high. Whether such changes occur in CICs is not known. Cell proliferation within different types of CICs during the menstrual cycle has not been studied. The effect of OCs on proliferation within the FTF and CICs has also not been studied. We are proposing to determine the effect of a 'traditional' high progestin dose OC on cell proliferation in the FTF and CICs in women undergoing a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RR-BSO), and to compare these proliferation rates to the rates during the normal menstrual cycle of women also undergoing an RR-BSO. The results of this study will provide crucial information regarding the relationship between OC use and protection against ovarian cancer. It will lay the foundation for further studies examining the effects of lower progestin dose OCs and OCs with newer progestin formulations. Our long-term goal in studying the mechanism of OC protection is to determine whether it is likely that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by OCs will be lost with alterations in OC formulation in terms of dose or type of progestin used, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer Risk Risk-reducing Surgery Fallopian Tube Fimbriae Ovarian Cortical Inclusion Cysts

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No intervention

No intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

OrthoNovum 1/35

OrthoNovum 1/35

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

OrthoNovum 1/35

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OrthoNovum 1/35

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Premenopausal
* 30 and 45 years of age
* Scheduled to undergo a laproscopically conducted RR-BSO, risk reducing salpingectomy, salpingectomy for sterilization, or salpingectomy with hysterectomy for non-cancer related conditions
* Have at least one ovary

Exclusion Criteria

* Past hysterectomy
* Past diagnosis of ovarian cancer
* Use of Tamoxifen, Raloxifene or hormone replacement therapy in the past 3 months
* Use of Chemotherapy in the last 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Celeste Pearce

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Celeste L Pearce, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

USC Keck School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

UBC BC Cancer Agency

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21CA178571-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

OC Prevention

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Women Surviving Ovarian Cancer
NCT00596349 COMPLETED
Debulking Surgery in Ovarian Cancer
NCT03378128 COMPLETED NA