The WOMEN Study: What is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in WomeN?
NCT ID: NCT00282711
Last Updated: 2012-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
824 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2004-06-30
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Extrapolation of the published clinical trial data (predominately obtained in men) for women is controversial due to differences in epidemiology of heart disease in women. Treatment is often sought later in life and is usually accompanied by more advanced disease and co-morbidities, which therefore, impact survival. In addition, women more frequently have an absence of clinical symptoms or an atypical presentation, making the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) challenging. Furthermore, women may also have their first manifestation of CAD as sudden death or acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, there is a clear need for the early identification of IHD in women so that treatments may be employed prior to having an advanced state of disease and higher risk for unfavorable outcomes.
The optimal non-invasive test for evaluation of IHD in women is unknown. A number of different modalities have been employed including exercise ECG stress testing, 2-dimensional stress echocardiography, single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging, and electron beam tomography. Additionally, the cohort of women for whom testing is performed is also ill defined.
The most recent AHA/ACC guidelines suggest that ECG stress testing should be the preferred approach. Supportive data for this recommendation are controversial, as many of the studies examining the diagnostic value of ECG stress testing were largely performed in small cohorts of women and are dated. These trials indicate that the diagnostic accuracy of stress testing is only fair (sensitivity=32-89%; specificity=41-68%). A recent meta-analysis in 3,874 women demonstrated modest sensitivity and specificity, 62% and 69% respectively, even after adjustment for referral bias (8). Published guidelines have also included a meta-analysis and confirmed a low level (sensitivity=33%) of detection of disease. Additionally, the high rate of false positives, as well as the inability to fully ascertain the extent of disease, therefore limits the potential value of ECG stress testing.
Even though exercise stress testing is supported by recent clinical guidelines, the addition of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging has independent and incremental diagnostic and prognostic value. Improved diagnostic accuracy has also been noted with perfusion imaging and its ability to predict cardiac events in women is well established. Furthermore, recent data supports the cost-effectiveness of strategies that employ myocardial perfusion imaging in the assessment of women at risk for ICD.
The current AHA/ACC recommendations fail to take into account that women often have limited ability to complete maximal exercise, a problem that is likely due to their older age and more frequent co-morbidities as compared with men. This functional impairment may lead to a lack of ischemia provocation and/or indeterminate exercise testing results. Maximal predicted heart rate, oxygen consumption, and, more commonly, metabolic equivalents (METs) are measures to estimate physical work capacity. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a simple 12-item questionnaire that estimates peak oxygen consumption. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire may identify patients who are likely to perform inadequate exercise, which amounts to nearly 40% of all women referred for exercise testing.
The optimal strategy for the evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease is unknown and quite controversial. Several algorithms have been suggested for the evaluation of women with suspected CAD. A recent consensus paper from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology suggested a strategy that employed perfusion imaging, but provided little evidence to support such a clinical strategy, such as with a prospective clinical trial. The focus of this investigation is to compare different strategies for the assessment of women at intermediate or high clinical risk for IHD and to do so on a prospective, randomized basis. This study is therefore focused on providing a high level of clinical evidence on which to base future recommendations and guidelines for the care of women with heart disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Standard Exercise treadmill test
No interventions assigned to this group
2
Exercise treadmill testing with nuclear imaging
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Women scoring \<5 METs on the DASI
* Nursing or pregnant females
* Nuclear medicine study within the preceding 10 days
* Electrocardiographic abnormalities precluding interpretation of peak stress changes including: Left bundle branch block, electronic ventricular pacemaker, left ventricular hypertrophy, WPW, and resting ST-T wave changes. Additionally, patients currently on digoxin therapy
* Significant valvular heart disease (i.e. severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation, or severe mitral insufficiency)
* Hemodynamic instability (blood pressure \>210/110 ml/Hg or \<90/60 mm/Hg)
* Left ventricular systolic dysfunction with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30 %
* Unavailability for long-term follow-up
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GE Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Hartford Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gary V. Heller, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT
Robert C. Hendel, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Jennifer H. Mieres, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
North SHore University Hospital, Long Island, NY
Leslie J. Shaw, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Atlanta Cardiovascular Research Institute, Atlanta, GA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southwest Heart
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Cardiology Consultants of Orange Country Medical Group, Inc
Anaheim, California, United States
Escondido Cardiology Associates
Escondido, California, United States
Mission Internal Medical Group
Mission Viejo, California, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital Women's Hrt Cnt
Orange, California, United States
Sutter Roseville Medical Center
Roseville, California, United States
Sacramento Heart & Vascular Res. Ctr.
Sacramento, California, United States
San Diego Cardiac Center
San Diego, California, United States
Cardiovascular Consultants
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Delaware SPECT Imaging
Newark, Delaware, United States
Florida Heart Associates
Fort Meyers, Florida, United States
Diagnostic Cardiology, PA
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Jacksonville Heart Center, PA
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Jacksonville Heart Center, PA
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, United States
Heart and Vascular Institute of Florida
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Cardiac Disease Specialists
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Idaho Cardiology Associates
Boise, Idaho, United States
Idaho Cardiology Associates
Meridian, Idaho, United States
Fox Valley Cardiovascular Consultants
Aurora, Illinois, United States
Saint Francis Hospital of Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Condell Medical Center
Libertyville, Illinois, United States
Iowa Heart Center
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Cardiovascular Associates
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Clinical Trials Management, LLC
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Androscoggin Cardiology Associates
Auburn, Maine, United States
Cardiovascular Consultants of Maine, PA
Scarborough, Maine, United States
Pentucket Medical Associates
Haverhill, Massachusetts, United States
Cardiology Associates of Northern Mississippi
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
Cardiovascular Consultants, PC
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Albany Associates in Cardiology
Albany, New York, United States
Brooklyn Nuclear SPECT Imaging
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Mid-Valley Cardiology
Kingston, New York, United States
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, United States
Blue Stem Cardiology
Bartlesville, Oklahoma, United States
Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of SC (MUSC)
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Heart Place
Dallas, Texas, United States
Deaconess Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, United States
Sudbury Regional Hospital
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Univ. of Ottawa Heart Insitute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Miller DD, Bonow RO, Berman DS, Heller GV, Mieres JH, Bairey-Merz CN, Berman DS, Bonow RO, Cacciabaudo JM, Heller GV, Hendel RC, Kiess MC, Miller DD, Polk DM, Shaw LJ, Smanio PE, Walsh MN; Writing Group on Perfusion Imaging in Women. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease--the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction]. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):95-101. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2003.130362. No abstract available.
Shaw LJ, Miller DD, Romeis JC, Kargl D, Younis LT, Chaitman BR. Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 1;120(7):559-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-7-199404010-00005.
Mosca L, Grundy SM, Judelson D, King K, Limacher M, Oparil S, Pasternak R, Pearson TA, Redberg RF, Smith SC Jr, Winston M, Zinberg S. Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Women.AHA/ACC Scientific Statement Consensus panel statement. Circulation. 1999 May 11;99(18):2480-4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2480. No abstract available.
Holdright DR, Fox KM. Characterization and identification of women with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J. 1996 Apr;17(4):510-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014902. No abstract available.
Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Beasley JW, Bricker JT, Duvernoy WF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, Marwick TH, McCallister BD, Thompson PD, Winters WL Jr, Yanowitz FG, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Eagle KA, Gardner TJ, Garson A Jr, Lewis RP, O'Rourke RA, Ryan TJ. ACC/AHA guidelines for exercise testing: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). Circulation. 1997 Jul 1;96(1):345-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.1.345. No abstract available.
Hlatky MA, Pryor DB, Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Mark DB, Rosati RA. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis. Am J Med. 1984 Jul;77(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90437-6.
Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 1;83(5):660-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00963-1.
Iskandrian AE, Heo J, Nallamothu N. Detection of coronary artery disease in women with use of stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997 Jul-Aug;4(4):329-35. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(97)90111-2. No abstract available.
Santana-Boado C, Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguade-Bruix S, Garcia-Burillo A, Canela T, Gonzalez JM, Cortadellas J, Ortega D, Soler-Soler J. Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men. J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):751-5.
Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Bairey CN, Cohen I, Cabico A, Friedman J, Germano G, Van Train KF, Diamond GA. Effective risk stratification using exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in women: gender-related differences in prognostic nuclear testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Jul;28(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00095-2.
Pancholy SB, Fattah AA, Kamal AM, Ghods M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging in women. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995 Mar-Apr;2(2 Pt 1):110-6. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(95)80021-2.
Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Friedman JD, Shaw LJ. Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. Circulation. 2002 Feb 19;105(7):823-9. doi: 10.1161/hc0702.103973.
Galassi AR, Azzarelli S, Tomaselli A, Giosofatto R, Ragusa A, Musumeci S, Tamburino C, Giuffrida G. Incremental prognostic value of technetium-99m-tetrofosmin exercise myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting outcomes in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jul 15;88(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01601-0.
Shaw LJ, Hendel R, Borges-Neto S, Lauer MS, Alazraki N, Burnette J, Krawczynska E, Cerqueira M, Maddahi J; Myoview Multicenter Registry. Prognostic value of normal exercise and adenosine (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: results from the multicenter registry of 4,728 patients. J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):134-9.
Marwick TH, Shaw LJ, Lauer MS, Kesler K, Hachamovitch R, Heller GV, Travin MI, Borges-Neto S, Berman DS, Miller DD. The noninvasive prediction of cardiac mortality in men and women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group. Am J Med. 1999 Feb;106(2):172-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00388-x.
Shaw LJ, Heller GV, Travin MI, Lauer M, Marwick T, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Miller DD. Cost analysis of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease in women with stable chest pain. Economics of Noninvasive Diagnosis (END) Study Group. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;6(6):559-69. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(99)90091-0.
Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Douglas JS, Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Grunwald MA, Levy D, Lytle BW, O'Rourke RA, Schafer WP, Williams SV. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: executive summary and recommendations. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation. 1999 Jun 1;99(21):2829-48. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.21.2829. No abstract available.
Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jun 14;300(24):1350-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197906143002402.
Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, Rogers WJ, Tyras DH, Berger R, Kennedy JW, Fisher L, Judkins MP, Mock MB, Killip T. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):360-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.360.
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee of Exercise Testing). 2002 American College of Cardiology website. Available at www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/exercise/dirlndex.htm
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42. doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975. No abstract available.
Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, Hachamovitch R, Arrighi JA, Merz CN, Gibbons RJ, Wenger NK, Heller GV; WOMEN Trial Investigators. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation. 2011 Sep 13;124(11):1239-49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.029660. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee of Exercise Testing)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
The WOMEN study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HELL001524HE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id