Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
678 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-05-31
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intervention to Reduce Injection Drug Use
NCT00786630
Motivational Assessment Program to Initiate Treatment
NCT01891656
Comparing Acute and Continuous Drug Abuse Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT01003496
The Men's Domestic Abuse Check-Up Engages Adult Men Concerned About Their Abusive Behavior and Alcohol or Drug Use
NCT01621334
Behavioral Therapy Development for Methamphetamine Abusers
NCT00249678
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. To conduct a detailed qualitative/ethnographic investigation to study: (a) the processes and factors operant in a person's decision to link with a substance abuse treatment agency once a formal (i.e., professional) assessment and referral have been made; and (b) the processes and factors operant in staying in treatment once it has been initiated.
2. To identify and classify, using quantitative methods, the operant barriers to treatment linkage and engagement. We will assess the factors that are associated with these barriers and examine the effects of the study's interventions on removing them.
3. To evaluate the effectiveness, using a controlled trial, of a Motivational Intervention and Strengths-Based Case Management, compared to the CIU's "standard" referral process, by examining differences between the Standard, Motivational Intervention, and Case Management conditions on treatment linkage and engagement outcomes. The conceptual framework for this controlled trial is the well-studied Andersen model of access and health service use, modified for chemical dependency services (Andersen, 1995). The interventions are designed to affect mutable factors such as perceived barriers to treatment. Data will be collected at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months thereafter. Analyses will examine whether the interventions work better with different groups of clients (e.g. cocaine users versus marijuana users, males versus females, different ethnicities, etc); as well as different treatment modalities (standard outpatient versus intensive outpatient.)
4. To conduct a quantitative investigation of the effects of Individual Level and Health Care System Level factors that predict treatment linkage and engagement in the context of the proposed interventions. This study component will develop comprehensive models to predict how these factors interact with the study's interventions to effect treatment linkage and treatment engagement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
One session of motivational interviewing
Motivational interviewing
One session
2
Five sessions of strengths-based case management
Strengths-Based Case Management
5 sessions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motivational interviewing
One session
Strengths-Based Case Management
5 sessions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Wright State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wright State University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard C Rapp, M.S.W.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samaritan CrisisCare
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSP 2527
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
02-407-10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.