Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine With or Without an Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery and/or Ablation for Liver Metastases Due to Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00268463
Last Updated: 2013-05-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-31
2008-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and an hepatic arterial infusion with floxuridine to see how well they work compared to oxaliplatin and capecitabine in treating patients who are undergoing surgery and/or ablation for liver metastases due to colorectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver
NCT00026234
Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy With Raltitrexed and Oxaliplatin Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer After Conventional Chemotherapy Failure
NCT01348412
Hepatic Arterial Infusion With FOLFOX Alone or in Combination With IV Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer With Liver Metastasis
NCT02345746
Surgery With or Without Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
NCT00006479
Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin Compared to Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00070213
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare progression-free interval (PFI) in patients undergoing surgical resection and/or ablation for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant therapy comprising oxaliplatin and capecitabine with vs without hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine.
Secondary
* Compare overall survival and liver PFI between the two treatment groups.
* Assess toxicity in each of the treatment regimens.
* Compare self-reported symptoms between two treatment groups.
* Compare quality of life in each of the treatment regimens.
Tertiary
* Examine the prognostic worth, in terms of PFI, of specific molecular markers in hepatic metastases.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to intended surgical technique (surgical resection alone vs cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation \[RFA\] alone vs combination of resection and ablation) and prior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy with vs without oxaliplatin vs no chemotherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
All patients undergo surgical resection and/or hepatic cryoablation or RFA to remove a maximum of 6 colorectal hepatic metastases. Patients randomized to arm II also undergo intra-arterial catheter and if applicable, pump placement.
* Arm 1 (oxaliplatin and capecitabine): Within 4-6 weeks after surgery and/or ablation, patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm 2 (oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine): Within 4-6 weeks after surgery and/or ablation, patients receive a continuous hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine on days 1-14, oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 22, and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 22-35. Treatment repeats every 42 days for 4 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Beginning with course 5, patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 4-6 weeks after surgery or ablation, approximately 18 weeks after beginning of chemotherapy, and 4-6 weeks after beginning the last cycle of chemotherapy.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin
Within 4-6 weeks after surgery and/or ablation, patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
capecitabine
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 22-35 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on days 1-14 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 22 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
Arm 2: Floxuridine + Oxaliplatin + Capecitabine
Within 4-6 weeks after surgery and/or ablation, patients receive a continuous hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine on days 1-14, oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 22, and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 22-35. Treatment repeats every 42 days for 4 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Beginning with cycle 5, patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine repeats every 21 days for 4 cycles.
capecitabine
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 22-35 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on days 1-14 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
floxuridine
Continuous hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine 0.2 mg/kg on days 1-14 every 42 days for 4 cycles
oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 22 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capecitabine
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oral capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 22-35 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on days 1-14 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
floxuridine
Continuous hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine 0.2 mg/kg on days 1-14 every 42 days for 4 cycles
oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles: Arm 1
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 22 every 42 days for 4 cycles and then on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles: Arm 2
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No more than 6 hepatic metastatic lesions that can potentially be resected or ablated
* For patients presenting with synchronous lesion(s) in the colon and/or rectum, the primary tumors must, in the opinion of the investigator, appear to be completely resectable
* Must be able to undergo surgery and/or ablation within 28 days following randomization
* No evidence of extrahepatic metastases
* No prior colorectal metastases
* No recurrent colorectal cancer concurrent with hepatic metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Life expectancy ≥ 5 years, excluding their colorectal cancer
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Zubrod) performance status 0-1
* No other malignancy within the past 5 years except carcinoma in situ of the cervix, melanoma in situ, basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, or carcinoma of the colon or rectum
* Absolute granulocyte count ≥ 1,200/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
* PT/international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 unless patient is on therapeutic doses of anticoagulant medication
* Total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 ULN
* aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 2.5 times ULN
* Calculated creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min
* Not pregnant or lactating
* Negative pregnancy test
* Patients with child bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception
* Able to swallow oral medication
* No preexisting chronic hepatic disease (e.g., chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis)
* No grade 3 or 4 anorexia or nausea
* No vomiting ≥ grade 2
* No clinically significant peripheral neuropathy defined as ≥ grade 2 neurosensory or neuromotor toxicity
* No psychiatric or addictive disorders or other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude study participation
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* Prior adjuvant fluorouracil alone or in combination with levamisole, leucovorin calcium, irinotecan hydrochloride, or oxaliplatin allowed if these regimens were completed \> 6 months ago
* No prior resection/ablation, hepatic arterial infusion therapy, or any systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease
* Prior excisional biopsy allowed
* No prior radiotherapy to the liver
* No concurrent bevacizumab in patients who have had pump/catheter placement receiving hepatic arterial infusion of floxuridine
* Patients who meet specific situations outlined in the protocol and who have not had pump placement may receive bevacizumab at the physician's discretion
* No concurrent halogenated antiviral agents such as sorivudine or brivudine in patients receiving fluorouracil, floxuridine, or capecitabine
* No concurrent filgrastim (G-CSF), pegfilgrastim, or sargramostim (GM-CSF) as primary prophylaxis for neutropenia
* Following neutropenic events, these drugs may be used at the physician's discretion during subsequent cycles
* No other concurrent cancer therapy
* No other concurrent investigational agents
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
NSABP Foundation Inc
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Norman Wolmark, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NSABP Foundation Inc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cancer Care Center at John Muir Health - Concord Campus
Concord, California, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Loma Linda (Pettis)
Loma Linda, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek, California, United States
John Muir/Mt. Diablo Comprehensive Cancer Center
Walnut Creek, California, United States
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, United States
Washington Cancer Institute at Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Curtis & Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute at Memorial Health University Medical Center
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Via Christi Cancer Center at Via Christi Regional Medical Center
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Louisville Oncology at Norton Cancer Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square Hospital Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Saint Joseph Mercy Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Bronson Methodist Hospital
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Altru Cancer Center at Altru Hospital
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States
Natalie Warren Bryant Cancer Center at St. Francis Hospital
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program
Portland, Oregon, United States
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
St. Luke's Cancer Network at St. Luke's Hospital
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
UMC Southwest Cancer and Research Center
Lubbock, Texas, United States
Fletcher Allen Health Care - University Health Center Campus
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Virginia Oncology Associates - Hampton
Hampton, Virginia, United States
Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center at West Virginia University Hospitals
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NSABP C-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.