Radiation Therapy and Either Capecitabine or Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Resectable Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00058474
Last Updated: 2016-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
1608 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-07-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin and comparing them to see how well they work when given before surgery in treating patients with resectable rectal cancer. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating rectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and External-Beam Radiation Therapy Followed by Surgery in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Cancer of the Rectum
NCT00006094
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgical Resection for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT00081289
Radiation Therapy and Fluorouracil With or Without Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Rectal Cancer
NCT00335816
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Excision And Observation vs Chemoradiotherapy For Rectal Cancer
NCT06205485
Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and Fluorouracil Before and After Radiation Therapy and Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery
NCT01263171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare the rate of local-regional relapse in patients with resectable rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy comprising radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin.
Secondary
* Compare the rate of clinical complete response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the rate of pathologic complete response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the increase in the number of patients who are able to undergo sphincter-saving surgery after treatment with these regimens.
* Correlate genetic patterns and the presence or absence of specific tissue biomarkers with response and prognosis in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare preoperative quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with oral capecitabine versus continuous infusion with fluorouracil.
* Determine the impact of oxaliplatin on neurotoxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the convenience of care in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the impact of the type of surgical management on QOL at 1 and 5 years postoperatively in these patients.
* Describe the long-term impact of cancer treatment on symptoms (e.g., vitality and neurotoxicity) and QOL at 5 years after randomization (5-year follow-up visit).
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, gender, clinical tumor stage (stage II vs stage III), and surgical intent (sphincter saving vs non-sphincter saving). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.
* Arm 1: Patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously and undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
* Arm 2: Patients receive fluorouracil and undergo radiotherapy as in arm 1. Patients also receive oxaliplatin IV over 1 hour once weekly for 5 weeks.
* Arm 3: Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily and undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
* Arm 4: Patients receive capecitabine and undergo radiotherapy as in arm 3. Patients also receive oxaliplatin as in arm 2.
Within 6-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients with responding or stable disease undergo surgery. Patients with progressive disease are treated at the discretion of the investigator and continue to be followed.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at completion of chemoradiotherapy, and at 1 and 5 years after surgery.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,606 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: 5-FU + RT
Patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously and undergo radiation therapy (RT) once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
fluorouracil
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
radiation therapy
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Arm 2: 5-FU + RT + Oxaliplatin
Patients receive fluorouracil and undergo RT as in arm 1. Patients also receive oxaliplatin IV over 1 hour once weekly for 5 weeks.
fluorouracil
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
oxaliplatin
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
radiation therapy
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Arm 3: Capecitabine + RT
Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily and undergo RT once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
capecitabine
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT
radiation therapy
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Arm 4: Capecitabine + RT + Oxaliplatin
Patients receive capecitabine and undergo RT as in arm 3. Patients also receive oxaliplatin as in arm 2.
capecitabine
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT
oxaliplatin
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
radiation therapy
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capecitabine
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT
fluorouracil
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
oxaliplatin
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
radiation therapy
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be \> 18 years of age.
* Patients must have a life expectancy of 5 years, excluding their diagnosis of cancer (as determined by the investigator), and must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Zubrod) performance status of 0 or 1.
* Patients must have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum obtained by a biopsy technique which leaves the major portion of the tumor intact.
* The interval between the initial diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma and randomization must be no more than 42 days.
* Prior to randomization, the investigator must specify the intent for sphincter saving or non-sphincter saving surgery.
* The tumor must be either palpable by digital rectal exam or be accessible via a proctoscope or sigmoidoscope.
* Distal border of the tumor must be located \< 12 cm from the anal verge.
* The tumor must be considered by the surgeon to be amenable to curative resection. (Note that curative resection can include pelvic exenteration.)
* The tumor must be clinically Stage II (T3-4 N0 with N0 being defined as all imaged lymph nodes are \< 1.0 cm) or Stage III (T1-4 N1-2 with the definition of a clinically positive node being any node \> 1.0 cm). Stage of the primary tumor may be determined by ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Computed Tomography (CT) scan is acceptable provided there is evidence of T4 and/or N1-2 disease.
* At the time of randomization, all patients must have had the following within the previous 42 days: history and physical examination; if technically feasible, a complete colonoscopic examination; if not feasible, a proctoscopic or sigmoidoscopic exam; clinical staging of the tumor; CT or MRI of the abdomen and pelvis (combined PET/CT may be substituted), and a chest x-ray (PA and lateral) or CT scan of the chest to exclude patients with metastatic disease.
* At the time of randomization: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) must be \> 1,200/mm3; Platelet count must be \> 100,000/mm3; There must be evidence of adequate hepatic function as follows: total bilirubin must be \< 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) for the lab; and alkaline phosphatase must be \< 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) for the lab; and the Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) must be \< 2.5 x ULN for the lab; and If AST is \> ULN, serologic testing for Hepatitis B and C must be performed and results must be negative; Calculated creatinine clearance must be \> 50 mL/min.
* Patients with prior malignancies, including invasive colon cancer, are eligible if they have been disease-free for \> 5 years and are deemed by their physician to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in situ, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or carcinoma in situ of the colon or rectum that have been effectively treated are eligible, even if these conditions were diagnosed within 5 years prior to randomization.
Exclusion Criteria
* On imaging, clear indication of involvement of the pelvic side wall(s).
* Rectal cancers other than adenocarcinoma, i.e., sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid, squamous cell carcinoma, cloacogenic carcinoma, etc.
* History of invasive rectal malignancy, regardless of disease-free interval.
* Pregnancy or lactation at the time of proposed randomization. Eligible patients of reproductive potential (both sexes) must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods.
* Any therapy for this cancer prior to randomization.
* Synchronous colon cancer.
* History of viral hepatitis or other chronic liver disease.
* Nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude the patient from receiving any chemotherapy treatment option or would prevent required follow-up. Specifically excluded are patients with active ischemic heart disease (class III\* or class IV\*\* myocardial disease as described by the New York Heart Association), a recent history (within 6 months) of myocardial infarction, or symptomatic arrhythmia at the time of randomization. \*Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Such patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity that causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. \*\*Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to perform any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
* Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, have uncontrolled hypertension.
* Active inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., patients requiring current medical interventions or who are symptomatic).
* Prior pelvic radiation therapy for any reason.
* Known hypersensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, or oxaliplatin.
* Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy at the time of randomization (defined in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 \[CTCAE v3.0\] as grade 2 or greater neurosensory or neuromotor toxicity).
* Existing uncontrolled coagulopathy.
* Inability to take oral medications.
* Participation in any investigational drug study within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
* Psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
NETWORK
NSABP Foundation Inc
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Norman Wolmark, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NSABP Foundation Inc
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ganz PA, Lopa SH, Yothers G, et al.: Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) versus abdomino-perineal resection (APR) in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NSABP R-04. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 30 (Suppl 15): A-3545, 2012.
Roh MS, Yothers GA, O'Connell MJ, et al.: The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-04. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 29 (Suppl 15): A-3503, 2011.
O'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7753. Epub 2014 May 5.
Russell MM, Ganz PA, Lopa S, Yothers G, Ko CY, Arora A, Atkins JN, Bahary N, Soori GS, Robertson JM, Eakle J, Marchello BT, Wozniak TF, Beart RW Jr, Wolmark N. Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04. Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):144-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000594.
Peipert JD, Roydhouse J, Tighiouart M, Henry NL, Kim S, Hays RD, Rogatko A, Yothers G, Ganz PA. Overall side effect assessment of oxaliplatin toxicity in rectal cancer patients in NRG oncology/NSABP R04. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3069-3079. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03746-5. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Ganz PA, Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Rogatko A, Ko CY, Colangelo LH, Arora A, Hopkins JO, Evans TL, Yothers G. Health-related quality of life outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer in NRG Oncology/NSABP R-04. Cancer. 2022 Sep 1;128(17):3233-3242. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34341. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NSABP-R-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CALGB-NSABP-R-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NSABP R-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.