Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin Compared to Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00070213
Last Updated: 2021-09-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
460 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2011-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying four different chemotherapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and Fluorouracil Before and After Radiation Therapy and Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed by Surgery
NCT01263171
Oxaliplatin, 5-FU and Leucovorin in Combination With Oral Capecitabine for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00205322
Comparison of Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00008281
Comparing Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00006468
Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine With or Without an Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery and/or Ablation for Liver Metastases Due to Colorectal Cancer
NCT00268463
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* Compare the progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with leucovorin calcium and fluorouracil with vs without oxaliplatin or capecitabine with vs without oxaliplatin.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these fluorouracil-based vs capecitabine-based regimens.
Secondary
* Compare the failure-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxic effects and adverse events associated with these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the limited health assessments of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the health economics associated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms and receive 12 weeks of therapy.
* Arm I (MdG regimen): Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV over 46 hours beginning on day 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may cross over and receive second-line therapy on arm II.
* Arm II (OxMdG regimen): Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV over 46 hours beginning on day 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may receive second-line therapy or supportive care off-study.
* Arm III (Cap regimen): Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may cross over and receive second-line therapy on arm IV.
* Arm IV (OxCap regimen): Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients with disease progression during or within 8 weeks of the completion of this regimen may receive second-line therapy or supportive care off-study.
All patients are then re-evaluated at least every 6 weeks and begin another 12 weeks of therapy at any evidence (e.g., clinical, radiological, or tumor marker) of disease progression. Patients with chemo-sensitive disease may repeat alternating 12-week therapy sessions and evaluation periods indefinitely.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 12-14 weeks, at 24 weeks, and then every 3 months thereafter.
Patients are followed every 3 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 460 patients (115 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MdG (modified de Gramont)
2 weekly 5FU/FA schedule
FOLFOX regimen
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
quality-of-life assessment
OxMdG (80%) for 12 weeks
MdG + oxaliplatin
FOLFOX regimen
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
oxaliplatin
quality-of-life assessment
Capcitabine
capecitabine
quality-of-life assessment
OxCap
capecitabine
oxaliplatin
quality-of-life assessment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FOLFOX regimen
capecitabine
fluorouracil
leucovorin calcium
oxaliplatin
quality-of-life assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Age
* Not specified
Performance status
* WHO 0-2
Life expectancy
* Not specified
Hematopoietic
* WBC greater than 3,000/mm\^3
* Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm\^3
Hepatic
* Bilirubin no greater than 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* AST or ALT no greater than 2.5 times ULN
Renal
* Creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL/min OR
* Glomerular filtration rate greater than 30 mL/min
Cardiovascular
* No uncontrolled angina
* No recent myocardial infarction
Other
* Not pregnant
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No partial or complete bowel obstruction
* No concurrent severe uncontrolled medical illness that would preclude study treatment
* No psychiatric or neurological condition that would preclude giving informed consent or complying with oral study medication
* No other prior or concurrent malignant disease that would preclude study treatment or assessment of response
* No prior neuropathy greater than grade 1
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
* Not specified
Chemotherapy
* More than 4 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil with or without leucovorin calcium
* More than 1 month since prior rectal chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil with or without leucovorin calcium
* No prior systemic palliative chemotherapy for metastatic disease
Endocrine therapy
* Not specified
Radiotherapy
* See Chemotherapy
Surgery
* Not specified
Other
* No concurrent brivudine or sorivudine
0 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leeds
OTHER
Medical Research Council
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cheryl Pugh
Clinical Project manager for FOCUS2 for Sponsor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew T. Seymour, MA, MD, FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cookridge Hospital
Gareth Griffiths
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Medical Research Council
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cookridge Hospital
Leeds, England, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials and Research Unit of the University of Leeds
Leeds, England, United Kingdom
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
London, England, United Kingdom
Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seymour MT, Thompson LC, Wasan HS, Middleton G, Brewster AE, Shepherd SF, O'Mahony MS, Maughan TS, Parmar M, Langley RE; FOCUS2 Investigators; National Cancer Research Institute Colorectal Cancer Clinical Studies Group. Chemotherapy options in elderly and frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS2): an open-label, randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1749-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60399-1. Epub 2011 May 11.
Seymour MT, Maughan TS, Wasan HS, et al.: Capecitabine (Cap) and oxaliplatin (Ox) in elderly and/or frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the FOCUS2 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-9030, 500s, 2007.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCRI-FOCUS2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MRC-CR09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EU-20303
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000330142
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.