Tenecteplase Pulmonary Embolism Italian Study

NCT ID: NCT00222651

Last Updated: 2008-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2006-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the efficacy and safety of Tenecteplase versus Placebo in normotensive patients with sub-massive Pulmonary Embolism and Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD) all receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In patients with major acute PE thrombolysis has been shown to be life saving (22). Recent registries showed the beneficial effect of thrombolysis also in patients with PE not associated with shock or hypotension (4-23). In these patients thrombolytic treatment has been shown to obtain an improvement of 37% in lung perfusion, detected by lung scan, with respect to an improvement of 18.8% obtained by heparin treatment (24). In a different trial, rt-PA resulted in a faster and greater improvement of pulmonary artery hypertension than heparin treatment (25). Indeed, PE has a wide spectrum of severity at presentation and it is conceivable that the use of more aggressive treatments should be reserved to patients at high risk for adverse outcome. Hence, the search started of prognostic factors of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism.

RVD has been associated with early adverse outcome (PE recurrence and mortality) in patients with acute PE (26-28; 3). In-hospital mortality in PE patients with and without echocardiographic RVD has been found to be 18.4% and 5.7%, respectively (3). Ribeiro et al. found a higher mortality in patients with PE and severe RVD: in-hospital mortality was 7.9% in the overall population with respect to 14.3% in patients with severe RVD (5). The ICOPER registry reported a 2-week mortality of 15.9% in patients presenting with RVD in comparison with 8% in patients without RVD (23). In MAPPET 10% of patients with RVD died within 30 days as compared to 4.1% of patients without (4).

RVD is a common finding in patients with acute PE and normal blood pressure (BP) (29-33). Recent data suggest that patients with objectively confirmed PE, normal BP and echocardiographic evidence of RVD have a high incidence of adverse outcome (7) and may potentially benefit from more aggressive treatment (34-35). In a recent study patients with acute PE were classified according to the presence of RVD and hypotension; the short-term mortality and the incidence of PE-related shock in patients with normal BP and echo RVD was respectively 5% and 10%. None of the patients with normal BP and no RVD died or experienced PE-related shock (6).

It has been recently demonstrated in patients with PE and pulmonary hypertension or RVD but without arterial hypotension or shock, that rt-PA significantly reduces the incidence of adverse in-hospital outcome events (death and clinical deterioration) with respect to heparin (8).

Consecutive patients with symptomatic PE, since no more than four days, confirmed by objective testing (high probability lung scan or intermediate probability lung scan and objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis or spiral CT or pulmonary angiography or TE echocardiography) will undergo echocardiographic examination within 24 hour from diagnosis. Patients with RVD and normal BP (Systolic BP\> 100 mmHg) will be included in the study.

180 patients will be randomized in the study. The patients included in the study will be randomized, in a double blind fashion, to receive Tenecteplase + UFH (90 patients) or Placebo + UFH (90 patients).

Study treatment should be administered within 6 hours from echocardiography. Echocardiography will be repeated at 24 hours and 7 days or discharge (whichever comes first) from Tenecteplase or Placebo injection. A Follow-up visit at 30 days from randomization will include: clinical history, physical examination and ECG and an echocardiographic examination.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pulmonary embolism right ventricular dysfunction thrombolysis echocardiography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tenecteplase

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 18 and 85;
* symptomatic PE confirmed by: high probability lung scan, or intermediate probability lung scan and objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis, or spiral CT-scan or pulmonary angiography or TE echocardiography;
* normal blood pressure (SBP \>100mmHg);
* RVD at echocardiography (see criteria);
* written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* absence of RVD at echocardiography;
* shock or hypotension (SBP \< 100 mmHg);
* therapeutic heparin (UFH or LMWH) treatment for more than 48 hours prior to randomization;
* administration of thrombolytic agents within the previous 4 days;
* vena cava filter insertion or pulmonary thrombectomy within the previous 4 days
* chronic pulmonary hypertension or severe COPD;
* hypertension defined as blood pressure \>180/110 mm Hg (systolic BP \>180 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP \>110 mm Hg) on a single, reliable measurement during current admission at enrolling site prior to randomisation;
* use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists within the preceding 7 days;
* significant bleeding disorders either at present or within the past 6 months;
* active peptic ulceration;
* known diabetic haemorrhagic retinopathy or other haemorrhagic ophthalmic conditions;
* known haemorrhagic diathesis;
* known arterial aneurysm and known arterial/venous malformation;
* known neoplasm with increased bleeding risk;
* prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (\>10 minutes) in the previous two weeks;
* current oral anticoagulation;
* major surgery, biopsy of a parenchymal organ, or significant trauma within the past 2 months;
* any known history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or dementia;
* any recent head trauma and any other trauma occurring after onset of the current pulmonary embolism;
* any known history of central nervous system damage (i.e. neoplasm, aneurysm, intracranial or spinal surgery);
* known subacute bacterial endocarditis;
* known acute pancreatitis;
* known severe hepatic dysfunction, including hepatic failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension
* (oesophageal varices) and active hepatitis;
* pregnancy or lactation or parturition within the previous 30 days;
* women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test, or use a medically accepted method of birth control;
* treatment with an investigational drug under another study protocol in the past 7 days;
* previous enrolment in this study;
* known hypersensitivity to Tenecteplase, Alteplase, unfractionated heparin, or to any of the excipients;
* anticipated or obvious problem with vascular access;
* any other condition that the investigator feels would place the patient at increased risk if the investigational therapy is initiated;
* inability to follow protocol requirements
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Of Perugia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Perugia

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giancarlo Agnelli, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Internal Medicine - University of Perugia

Cecilia Becattini, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Internal Medicine - University of Perugia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dipartimento di Cardiologia - Ospedale del Delta

Lagosanto, Ferrara, Italy

Site Status

Unità Operativa di Cardiologia - Azienda Ospedaliera - Ospedale Civile di Vimercate

Desio, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Divisione di Cardiologia - Azienda Ospedaliera - Ospedale Civile di Legnano

Legnano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Unità Operativa di Cardiologia - Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi

Varese, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Divisione Medica II - Ospedale di Vimercate

Vimercate, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza e Pronto Soccorso - Opsedale Regionale

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Divisione di Cardiologia - Azienda Ospedaliera di Venere -Giovanni XXIII

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

U.O. di Cardiologia - Ospedale di Bentivoglio

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina d'Urgenza - Policlinico S. Orsola

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

UTIC - Ospedale Civile di Brescia

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto di Cardiologia - Casa di Cura Poliambulanza - Congregazione Suore Ancelle della Carità

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza, Cardiologia - Ospedale Civile "San Sebastiano"

Caserta, , Italy

Site Status

Dipartimento di Emergenza Accettazione - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Divisione Medica II - Ospedale Galliera

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Dipartimento di Emegernza e Accetazione (DEA) - Az. Ospedale-Università San Martino di Genova

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto di Cardiologia - Presidio Ospedaliero Piana di Lucca

Lucca, , Italy

Site Status

Dipartimento Cuore Polmone - Ospedale Carlo Poma

Mantova, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto di Cardiologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Fatebenfratelli Oftalmico

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto di Pneumologia - Ospedale San Giuseppe

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Unità Operativa di Cardiologia - Ospedale S Carlo Borromeo

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza - Az. Osped. Ospedale Niguarda "Cà Granda"

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina Interna II - Azienda Ospedaliera "Maggiore della Carità" di Novara

Novara, , Italy

Site Status

Department of Internal Medicine - University of Perugia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Malattie Apparato Respiratorio - Ospedale Cisanello

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Reparto di Angiologia - Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Divisione di Cardiologia - Ospedale Civile

Rovigo, , Italy

Site Status

Divisione di Pneumologia - Ospedale S Maria

Terni, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza - Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista "Le Molinette"

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Medicina D'Urgenza - Ospedale Cattinara

Trieste, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Becattini C, Agnelli G, Salvi A, Grifoni S, Pancaldi LG, Enea I, Balsemin F, Campanini M, Ghirarduzzi A, Casazza F; TIPES Study Group. Bolus tenecteplase for right ventricle dysfunction in hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2010 Mar;125(3):e82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.09.017. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19833379 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRU-UniPg-01-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id