Exhale (R) Stent for Emphysema

NCT ID: NCT00207337

Last Updated: 2008-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2006-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current treatment for emphysema is limited to measures that include inhaled oxygen, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Highly invasive procedures such as lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation are also performed. Treatment using the Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic treatment that has the potential to reduce shortness of breath in emphysema patients. This study tests the safety and effects of Exhale DES in the treatment of patients with emphysema.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Emphysema affects an estimated 60 million people worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In its most basic terms, emphysema causes the destruction of lung parenchyma resulting in collateral ventilation from one part of the lung to another through the disrupted alveolar walls, to the point that gas transport from one part of the lung to another may exceed gas flow through the small airways. In other words, the gas can move freely about within the lung, but it cannot get out, which causes over inflation, or hyperinflation of the diseased lung. When the disease is far advanced, patients are afflicted with disabling dyspnea that progressively restricts their activities and eventually causes great suffering. The crippling effects of end-stage emphysema, including severe dyspnea and marked limitation of activities, relate in large measure to the dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs associated with the loss of elasticity, gas trapping and collapse of small airways. The progressive enlargement of the thorax and flattening of the diaphragm render inspiratory muscles inefficient, increase the work of breathing and contribute to a feeling of breathlessness. The major medical therapeutic modalities include bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drugs directed at decreasing airway resistance and antibiotics to combat infection. Pulmonary rehabilitation techniques and exercise training have proven of palliative benefit. In general, the results of medical treatment for advanced airway obstruction frequently result in a persistently anguished patient and frustrated physician. A system that could efficiently decompress emphysematous lungs with each breath would result in significant clinical benefit, including lessened dyspnea, decreased work of breathing, and increased exercise tolerance.

In addition to medical therapies, there are two surgical therapies available to emphysema sufferers: Lung transplantation and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery (LVRS). In the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), LVRS was shown to be effective in a sub-set of emphysema patients, but it had the drawback of increased short-term mortality as compared to the medical control arm. This was likely due to the invasiveness of LVRS.

Lung transplantation is a widely accepted surgical treatment for emphysema; however it is an unrealistic option for most patients. The selection criteria are very stringent for acceptance to receive a donor lung(s). Lung transplantation carries a high long-term morbidity and mortality and is severely limited by the shortage of available donor lungs.

We seek to take advantage of collateral ventilation seen in advanced emphysema by creating passageways from the lung parenchyma to large airways, through which air can escape the lungs during exhalation. The Exhale therapeutic intervention should be applicable to the majority of emphysema patients who suffer from hyperinflation of their lungs. It would be desirable to have a therapeutic option that is both less invasive and more readily available to emphysema sufferers. We have been working on such a therapy and have begun to investigate it in the clinic.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emphysema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exhale Drug-Eluting Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. High resolution computed tomography (CT) scan evidence of bilateral emphysema
2. Residual volume (RV) ≥ 220% predicted.
3. Total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 133% of predicted value.
4. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) \< 40% of predicted or FEV1 \< 1 liter.
5. Marked dyspnea, scoring ≥ 2 on the modified Medical Research Council scale of 0-4.
6. Patient has undergone pulmonary rehabilitation of 16 - 20 sessions.

Exclusion Criteria

1. FEV1 \> 20%
2. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) \< 15% of predicted.
3. Respiratory infection requiring \> 3 hospitalizations in past year
4. Inability to walk \> 140 meters in 6 minutes
5. Giant bulla \> 1/3 of one lung's volume
6. Previous lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or lobectomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Broncus Technologies

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gregory I. Snell, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Alfred

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Prince Charles Hospital

Rode Road, Chermside, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

The Alfred Hospital

Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Concord Repatriation General Hospital

Burwood, , Australia

Site Status

Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Universitätsklinik des Saarlandes

Homburg, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Brazil Germany

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.broncus.com

Broncus Technologies, Inc corporate web page

http://www.lungusa.org

American Lung Association

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0304-28

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dose-ranging Study
NCT01712451 COMPLETED PHASE2