A Study of the Cataractogenic Potential of Seroquel and Risperdal in the Treatment of Participants With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder

NCT ID: NCT00206102

Last Updated: 2013-01-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1098 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This Phase IV, randomized, parallel-group study is designed to evaluate the cataractogenic potential of quetiapine fumarate (SEROQUEL) compared with that of a putative non-cataractogenic antipsychotic medication risperidone (RISPERDAL). This study is being conducted to fulfill the SEROQUEL Phase IV commitment regarding evaluation of cataractogenic potential.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia Schizoaffective Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Quetiapine fumarate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

quetiapine fumarate

Intervention Type DRUG

flexible dose oral

2

Risperidone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

risperidone

Intervention Type DRUG

flexible dose oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

quetiapine fumarate

flexible dose oral

Intervention Type DRUG

risperidone

flexible dose oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Seroquel ICI 204,636

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women age 18 to 65
* Both Eyes present with lenses intact (no previous cataract extractions)
* Stable place of residency

Exclusion Criteria

* History of corneal surgery
* Legal blindness (defined as best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in one or both eyes
* Previous participation in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AstraZeneca Seroquel Medical Science Director, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mabelvale, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morrilton, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cerritos, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Marcos, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Britian, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oak Brook Terrace, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Schaumburg, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Moorestown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Paramus, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Stratford, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beechwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medina, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Media, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Irving, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Midvale, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D1441C00089

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

5077IL/0089

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.