Seroquel Alone Versus Seroquel With an SSRI for Depression With Psychotic Symptoms

NCT ID: NCT00955474

Last Updated: 2017-04-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of Seroquel monotherapy for the treatment of Major Depression with Psychotic features with Seroquel plus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed study is designed to investigate the non-inferiority of treatment of PsyD using monotherapy with quetiapine XR versus combination treatment using quetiapine XR and an SSRI (sertraline or citalopram or escitalopram) during the acute phase of treatment. The primary outcome measures will be the change rates of symptoms of depression (as measured on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression \[HAM-D-17\] and psychosis (as measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale \[BPRS\] Positive Symptoms Subscale).

The secondary aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of quetiapine XR and SSRIs in patients with the diagnosis of PsyD. Metabolic factors including fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and fasting lipids (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides) will be obtained at screen and at the 8-week endpoint of the study to assess the impact of treatment on the development of risk factors for metabolic syndrome. Measures of cognitive function (MGH Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire and RBANS) (Fava et al. 2006; Randolph et al. 1998) will be obtained at screen and the 8-week endpoint of the study to assess the impact of treatment on cognitive function.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic Features

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quetiapine

Patients assigned to receive Quetiapine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quetiapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Quetiapine XR 100 mg/h.s. will be the starting dose and increased by 100 mg q h.s. q day to a target dose of 300 mg/h.s. by day three and continued on 300 mg/h.s. through week three. Between weeks four and eight, there will be flexible dosing up to 800 mg/h.s. or reductions in doses to no lower than 200 mg/h.s. Incremental increases or decreases in dose will be no more than 100 mg/h.s. over a minimum of one week, unless a patient is unable to tolerate the current dose. Patients unable to tolerate at least 200 mg/h.s. will be discontinued from the study.

Quetiapine and SSRI

Patients assigned to receive Quetiapine and SSRI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Quetiapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Quetiapine XR 100 mg/h.s. will be the starting dose and increased by 100 mg q h.s. q day to a target dose of 300 mg/h.s. by day three and continued on 300 mg/h.s. through week three. Between weeks four and eight, there will be flexible dosing up to 800 mg/h.s. or reductions in doses to no lower than 200 mg/h.s. Incremental increases or decreases in dose will be no more than 100 mg/h.s. over a minimum of one week, unless a patient is unable to tolerate the current dose. Patients unable to tolerate at least 200 mg/h.s. will be discontinued from the study.

escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Active comparator arm:

Escitalopram 5 mg/a.m. starting dose; increase to 10 mg/a.m. at week 2 and continued at 10 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 20 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 5 mg/a.m.

Sertraline

Intervention Type DRUG

Active comparator arm:

Sertraline 50 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to 100 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 100 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 200 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 50 mg/a.m.

Citalopram 20 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to a target dose of 40 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 40 mg/a.m. through Week 8: reductions in doses to no lower than 20 mg/a.m.

Escitalopram 5 mg/a.m. starting dose; increase to 10 mg/a.m. at week 2 and continued at 10 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 20 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 5 mg/a.m.

Citalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Active comparator arm:

Citalopram 20 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to a target dose of 40 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 40 mg/a.m. through Week 8: reductions in doses to no lower than 20 mg/a.m.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quetiapine

Quetiapine XR 100 mg/h.s. will be the starting dose and increased by 100 mg q h.s. q day to a target dose of 300 mg/h.s. by day three and continued on 300 mg/h.s. through week three. Between weeks four and eight, there will be flexible dosing up to 800 mg/h.s. or reductions in doses to no lower than 200 mg/h.s. Incremental increases or decreases in dose will be no more than 100 mg/h.s. over a minimum of one week, unless a patient is unable to tolerate the current dose. Patients unable to tolerate at least 200 mg/h.s. will be discontinued from the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

escitalopram

Active comparator arm:

Escitalopram 5 mg/a.m. starting dose; increase to 10 mg/a.m. at week 2 and continued at 10 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 20 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 5 mg/a.m.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sertraline

Active comparator arm:

Sertraline 50 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to 100 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 100 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 200 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 50 mg/a.m.

Citalopram 20 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to a target dose of 40 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 40 mg/a.m. through Week 8: reductions in doses to no lower than 20 mg/a.m.

Escitalopram 5 mg/a.m. starting dose; increase to 10 mg/a.m. at week 2 and continued at 10 mg/a.m. through week 3. Weeks 4-8: flexible dosing up to 20 mg/a.m. or reductions in doses to no lower than 5 mg/a.m.

Intervention Type DRUG

Citalopram

Active comparator arm:

Citalopram 20 mg/a.m. starting dose; increased to a target dose of 40 mg/a.m. at week 2; continued on 40 mg/a.m. through Week 8: reductions in doses to no lower than 20 mg/a.m.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Quetiapine (generic name): Seroquel (brand name) Lexapro Zoloft (brand name) Celexa

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent
2. Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features by the DSM-IV
3. Females and Males between the ages of 18-85 years.
4. Female patients of childbearing potential must be using a reliable method of contraception and have a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test at enrolment
5. Able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study
6. Initial HAM-D-17 score of \> 16, both at the screen visit and at the baseline visit.
7. Participants must have an initial BPRS score of \> 25 and at least one of the following: \> 5 for item 1, \> 5 for item 5, \> 5 for item 8, \> 4 for item 9, \> 1 for item 10, \> 1 for item 11; these BPRS criteria msut be met both at the screen visit and at the baseline visit.
8. Participants must have an initial CGI score of \> 2, both at the screen visit and at the baseline visit.

3. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an imminent risk of suicide or a danger to self or others
4. Known intolerance or lack of response to quetiapine fumarate, as judged by the investigator
5. Use of any of the following cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors in the 14 days preceding enrolment including but not limited to: ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, erythromycin, clarithromycin, troleandomycin, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, fluvoxamine and saquinavir
6. Use of any of the following cytochrome P450 inducers in the 14 days preceding enrollment including but not limited to: phenytoin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, rifampin, St. John's Wort, and glucocorticoids
7. Administration of a depot antipsychotic injection within one dosing interval (for the depot) before randomization
8. Substance or alcohol dependence within the past three months (except dependence in full remission, and except for caffeine or nicotine dependence), as defined by DSM-IV criteria
9. Opiates, amphetamine, barbiturate, cocaine, cannabis, or hallucinogen abuse by DSM-IV criteria within 4 weeks prior to enrolment
10. Medical conditions that would affect absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of study treatment
11. Unstable or inadequately treated medical illness (e.g. diabetes, angina pectoris, hypertension) as judged by the investigator
12. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study
13. Previous enrolment or randomization of treatment in the present study.
14. Participation in another drug trial within 4 weeks prior enrollment into this study or longer in accordance with local requirements
15. A patient with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) fulfilling one of the following criteria:

* Unstable DM defined as enrollment glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \> 8.5%.
* Admitted to hospital for treatment of DM or DM related illness in past 12 weeks.
* Not under physician care for DM.
* Physician responsible for patient's DM care has not indicated that patient's DM is controlled.
* Physician responsible for patient's DM care has not approved patient's participation in the study
* Has not been on the same dose of oral hypoglycaemic drug(s) and/or diet for the 4 weeks prior to randomization. For thiazolidinediones (glitazones) this period should not be less than 8 Weeks.
* Taking insulin whose daily dose on one occasion in the past 4 weeks has been more than 10% above or below their mean dose in the preceding 4 weeks
16. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 1.5 x 10\^9 per liter
17. Patients with a history seizure disorder; unstable physical disorders (cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic, or hematologic); or any physical disorder judged to significantly affect central nervous system function.
18. Patients who are currently treated with antidepressants other than the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, with mood stabilizing or antipsychotic drugs other than quetiapine.
19. Patients with known arrhythmias or arrhythmias noted on screening EKG.
20. Outpatients with a CGI score of 7.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnancy or lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John D. Matthews

Director of Inpatient Research & Training

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John D Matthews, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008P001022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.