Effect of Botulinum Toxin in Neurogenic Bladders in Children With Myelomeningocele

NCT ID: NCT00175123

Last Updated: 2009-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine how injection of botulinum toxin in the bladder affects bladder function. The trial is carried out in children born with malformation of the spinal cord and subsequent overactive bladders. The purpose of treating the bladder (with different drugs) is to prevent damage to the kidneys and renal function. The aim of this study is to compare a conventionally used drug (oxybutynin) with botulinum toxin. The hypothesis of the study is that botulinum toxin is equal to oxybutynin in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neurogenic bladder is often seen in children with myelomeningocele, tumors in the spinal canal, or a traumatized spinal cord. The majority of the patients have high pressure bladders which can lead to reflux and frequent infections in the urinary tract. Although children experience insufficient bladder emptying, many of them also experience urinary incontinence and have to perform clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). If no intervention is made, the children are at high risk of renal deterioration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelomeningocele Bladder, Neurogenic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum A toxin

Intravesical injection. 12 IE/kg b.w.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Myelomeningocele
* Neurogenic bladder with untreated leak point pressures \> 40 mmH2O
* Treated with oxybutynin or other parasympatholytics

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute urinary tract infection
* Compromised neuromuscular transmission
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aarhus University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bettina Jorgensen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Section Skejby

Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

J.nr.2612-2319

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

J.nr.20030155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Botox

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sling vs Botox for Mixed Incontinence
NCT04171531 COMPLETED PHASE3
Toxin Retrospective Study
NCT03042052 COMPLETED
PTNS vs Botox of Refractory OAB
NCT04451382 TERMINATED