Botulinum Toxin a Vs Anticholinergic Treatment of Neurogenic Overactive Bladder in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT04819360

Last Updated: 2024-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Botulinum toxin type A injections into the detrusor at a dose of 200 units (U) of BOTOX® are a recognized second-line treatment for the treatment of adult neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders. Anticholinergics are established as the usual first-line treatment for neurogenic detrusor hyperactivity, but are oft not sufficiently effective and have significant side effects. In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffering from overactive bladder, the 200 U dose of BOTOX® is very effective but induces a risk of urinary retention in 30% of patients requiring the temporary use of self-catheterization1. At 100 U, a recent study shows the efficacy and very good tolerance of botulinum toxin A in terms of probing risk in MS patients with overactive bladder and failure of anticholinergics. Furthermore, the efficacy of anticholinergics in MS has been little studied and is also disputed.

The investigators plan to test the therapeutic alternative as the first line of treatment in two groups of randomized MS patients from a homogeneous population suffering from overactive bladder:

* a group testing the effectiveness of low doses of botulinum toxin type A (100 U, BOTOX®),
* the other group receiving the standard anticholinergic treatment (solifenacin succinate, Vesicare®).

During this pilot study, the efficacy and side effects profile of each treatment will be analyzed in order to determine the amplitudes of effect and the safety profiles in this population and in order to establish the statistical hypotheses for a subsequent randomized multicenter study. The aim of this study will be to establish the benefit of botulinum toxin at a dose of 100 U as a first-line treatment instead of anticholinergics

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX®) injections will performed on an outpatient basis by cystoscopy under local anesthesia. Twenty minutes after an intravesical instillation of 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine, the botulinum toxin is injected into the detrusor muscle using a flexible injection needle at a rate of 10 U of BOTOX® per mL (10 points of 1 mL injections). Intravenous prophylaxis (cefuroxime 1.5 g) will be performed 30 minutes before the injections.

Patients in the Vesicare® arm will be given the tablets at the baseline visit to be taken once a day in the morning for 12 weeks. For this arm, there will be no antibiotic prophylaxis.

Randomization will be carried out via eCRF in the secuTrial® environment with an integrated Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) function allowing the allocation of a participant to one of the two intervention groups. Randomization will be carried out using a randomization table in blocks of 2, predefined without the knowledge of the investigator, respecting a balanced allocation between the two groups, necessary given the modest number of participants in the study.

The intensity of therapeutic responses for each treatment is not precisely known in this patient population. As a result, there are no reliable preliminary data which would allow the investigators to calculate under these "effect size" assumptions the necessary numbers of participants to be randomized between the two intervention groups in order to demonstrate a possible superiority of treatment by injection of BOTOX® 100 U in comparison to the reference anticholinergic treatment. The comparative study will therefore only be accessible after determining the intensity of these effects.

Within the framework of a pilot study not directly comparative of the therapeutic approaches but seeking to identify the amplitude of the effects obtained independently by the two treatments, it does not appear necessary to resort to a study design with "double-dummy" to leave the patient blind to the method used. Such an approach would require the use of a sham injection by cystoscopic route in the group treated with anticholinergics and would not appear ethical in this context.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vesicare

Group 1: will be treated with an anticholinergic (Vesicare® 10 mg per day for 12 weeks)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VESIcare 10Mg Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Vesicare® 10 mg per day for 12 weeks

Vesicare 10mg 12 weeks

Botox

Group 2: will receive an intra-detrusor injection of a low dose of botulinum toxin type A (100 U of BOTOX®).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Botox 100 UNT Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

1 injection of Botox® 100 UNT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VESIcare 10Mg Tablet

Vesicare® 10 mg per day for 12 weeks

Vesicare 10mg 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Botox 100 UNT Injection

1 injection of Botox® 100 UNT

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vesicare Botox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with neurogenic detrusor overactivity proven by urodynamics
* Stable MS with an Expanded Disability Severity Score (EDSS) less than or equal to 6.5
* Voluntary micturitions
* Number of micturitions \> 8 per day, with or without episodes of urgency and urgency incontinence
* Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, breastfeeding
* Patients requiring self-catheterizations
* Patients unable or unwilling to learn self-catheterisation
* Recent (\<12 weeks) or current treatment with botulinum toxin for any non-urological indication
* Recent (≤ 8 weeks) or current treatment with anticholinergic drugs
* Patients with a positive history or evidence of pelvic / urological abnormality (interstitial cystitis, bladder lithiasis in the 6 months preceding the screening, or any other condition / operation affecting the bladder or prostate)
* Any contraindication to Vesicare®:

* Hypersensitivity to the active ingredient or to one of the excipients
* Urinary retention
* Untreated narrow-angle glaucoma
* Severe gastrointestinal illness (e.g. toxic megacolon)
* Myasthenia gravis
* Severe hepatic failure
* Hemodialysis
* Severe renal failure, or liver function disturbances of moderate severity with concomitant treatment with a strong inhibitor of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, including patients at risk for these diseases.
* Any contraindication to BOTOX®:

* Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to one of the excipients
* Presence of a symptomatic infection at the planned injection site(s)
* Urinary tract infection at the time of planned treatment
* Patients who present with acute urinary retention at the time of treatment and who do not regularly use bladder catheterization
* Patients who do not want and / or cannot, if necessary, perform self-intermittent catheterisation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigitte Schürch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brigitte Schürch

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brigitte Schürch, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chermansky C, Schurch B, Rahnama'i MS, Averbeck MA, Malde S, Mancini V, Valentini F, Sahai A. How can we better manage drug-resistant OAB/DO? ICI-RS 2018. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Dec;38 Suppl 5:S46-S55. doi: 10.1002/nau.24055.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31821628 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SEPTOX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Toxin Retrospective Study
NCT03042052 COMPLETED