Impact of Immunosuppressive Regimens on Polyomavirus-related Transplant Nephropathy
NCT ID: NCT00160966
Last Updated: 2017-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Studying the Effect of Changing Immunosuppression in Case of Polyoma BK Virus Infection of the Renal Transplant
NCT01289301
Immunoregulatory Effects of Immunoglobulin Induction Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients
NCT00176059
Th1, Th2 and Monokine Responses as Risk Factors of Renal Transplant Rejection
NCT00150891
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium, After Equimolar Conversion From Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), in Patients With Stable Renal Transplant Receiving Tacrolimus
NCT00171392
RCT Comparing Immunosuppressive Regimens in Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients
NCT03797196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Comparison(s): renal transplant recipients stratified according to their relative immunological risk (group 1: low risk (primary recipients without pre-immunization \[PRA \< 5%\]); group 2: moderate risk (group 2a: primary recipients with low pre-immunization \[PRA 6-20%\]; group 2b: re-transplanted patients); group 3: very high risk (re-transplanted patients with a history of vascular rejection or recipients of a first graft with high pre-immunization \[PRA \> 20%\]) randomized to be treated with one of three immunosuppressive regimens (CsA/MMF, Tacr/MMF, Tacr/MMF with subsequent conversion to Tacr/ERL).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Immunosuppression with Ciclosporin and Mycophenolate-mofetil; Ciclosporin treatment being started at the latest at day 4 after transplantation with 7 mg/kg body weight daily administered every 8 hours until the target trough level of 300 µg/l was reached. Then it was administered twice daily with daily monitoring of trough levels. The target trough level was lowered to 200 µg/l 1 month after transplantation. Thereafter dosage and target trough levels were adjusted at the investigators discretion. Mycophenolate-mofetil was started previous to transplantation procedure with a starting dosage of 3 g/day administered twice daily. Once ciclosporin was entered into the therapy-scheme Mycophenolate-mofetil dosage was reduced to 2 g/daily. The therapy was controlled by measuring of trough levels with a target trough level exceeding 1 µg/ml. The dosage was adjusted at the investigators discretion.
Ciclosporin and Mycophenolate-mofetil
according to the Giessen protocol
2
Immunosuppression with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil Mycophenolate-mofetil was started previous to transplantation procedure with a starting dosage of 3 g/day administered twice daily. Once tacrolimus was entered into the therapy-scheme Mycophenolate-mofetil dosage was reduced to 2 g/daily. The therapy was controlled by measuring of trough levels with a target trough level exceeding 1 µg/ml. The dosage was adjusted to clinical signs of overimmunosuppression (infections) or intolerance (mainly gastrointestinal side effects) or rejections.
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil
according to Giessen protocol
3
Immunosuppression with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil with change from Mycophenolate-mofetil to Everolimus after completion of posttransplant wound healing
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil with change from Mycophenolate-mofetil to Everolimus
according to Giessen protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ciclosporin and Mycophenolate-mofetil
according to the Giessen protocol
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil
according to Giessen protocol
Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate-mofetil with change from Mycophenolate-mofetil to Everolimus
according to Giessen protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary, secondary, and tertiary transplant recipients
* Pre-immunized and not pre-immunized transplant recipients
* Age \> 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* History of severe gastrointestinal morbidity
* Age \< 18 years
* Pregnant or breast feeding women
* Rejection of effective contraceptive methods with young women
* Combined kidney and islet cell transplantation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Heidelberg University
OTHER
Hoffmann-La Roche
INDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Inc
INDUSTRY
Novartis
INDUSTRY
University of Giessen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. Rolf Weimer
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rolf Weimer, Prof., MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Giessen, Internal Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen
Giessen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andrews CA, Shah KV, Daniel RW, Hirsch MS, Rubin RH. A serological investigation of BK virus and JC virus infections in recipients of renal allografts. J Infect Dis. 1988 Jul;158(1):176-81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.1.176.
Barri YM, Ahmad I, Ketel BL, Barone GW, Walker PD, Bonsib SM, Abul-Ezz SR. Polyoma viral infection in renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppressive therapy. Clin Transplant. 2001 Aug;15(4):240-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150404.x.
Nickeleit V, Hirsch HH, Zeiler M, Gudat F, Prince O, Thiel G, Mihatsch MJ. BK-virus nephropathy in renal transplants-tubular necrosis, MHC-class II expression and rejection in a puzzling game. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Mar;15(3):324-32. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.3.324.
Hirsch HH, Knowles W, Dickenmann M, Passweg J, Klimkait T, Mihatsch MJ, Steiger J. Prospective study of polyomavirus type BK replication and nephropathy in renal-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 15;347(7):488-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020439.
Hirsch HH. Polyomavirus BK nephropathy: a (re-)emerging complication in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2002 Jan;2(1):25-30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.020106.x.
Hirsch HH, Mohaupt M, Klimkait T. Prospective monitoring of BK virus load after discontinuing sirolimus treatment in a renal transplant patient with BK virus nephropathy. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 1;184(11):1494-5; author reply 1495-6. doi: 10.1086/324425. No abstract available.
Binet I, Nickeleit V, Hirsch HH, Prince O, Dalquen P, Gudat F, Mihatsch MJ, Thiel G. Polyomavirus disease under new immunosuppressive drugs: a cause of renal graft dysfunction and graft loss. Transplantation. 1999 Mar 27;67(6):918-22. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199903270-00022.
Weimer R, Susal C, Yildiz S, Streller S, Pelzl S, Staak A, Renner F, Dietrich H, Daniel V, Feuring E, Kamali-Ernst S, Ernst W, Padberg W, Opelz G. sCD30 and neopterin as risk factors of chronic renal transplant rejection: impact of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Transplant Proc. 2005 May;37(4):1776-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.02.088.
Weimer R, Staak A, Susal C, Streller S, Yildiz S, Pelzl S, Renner F, Dietrich H, Daniel V, Rainer L, Kamali-Ernst S, Ernst W, Padberg W, Opelz G. ATG induction therapy: long-term effects on Th1 but not on Th2 responses. Transpl Int. 2005 Feb;18(2):226-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00047.x.
Weimer R, Mytilineos J, Feustel A, Preiss A, Daniel V, Grimm H, Wiesel M, Opelz G. Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression and cytokine genotypes: effects on monokine secretion and antigen presentation in long-term renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003 Jun 27;75(12):2090-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000058808.37349.23.
Weimer R, Streller S, Staak A, Heilke M, Li D, Dietrich H, Daniel V, Feustel A, Rainer L, Zinn S, Friemann S, Ernst W, Grimm H, Padberg W, Zimmermann T, Opelz G. Effects of three immunosuppressive regimens on CD4 helper function, B cell monocyte and cytokine responses in renal transplant recipients: 4-month follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Transplant Proc. 2002 Sep;34(6):2377-8. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(02)03278-5. No abstract available.
Weimer R, Melk A, Daniel V, Friemann S, Padberg W, Opelz G. Switch from cyclosporine A to tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients: impact on Th1, Th2, and monokine responses. Hum Immunol. 2000 Sep;61(9):884-97. doi: 10.1016/s0198-8859(00)00152-x.
Daniel V, Arzberger J, Melk A, Weimer R, Ruhenstroth A, Carl S, Wiesel M, Opelz G. Predictive indicators of rejection or infection in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 1999 Feb-Mar;31(1-2):1364-5. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)02030-2. No abstract available.
Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Carl S, Staehler G, Opelz G. Pretransplant CD4 helper function and interleukin 10 response predict risk of acute kidney graft rejection. Transplantation. 1996 Dec 15;62(11):1606-14. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199612150-00014.
Daniel V, Pasker S, Wiesel M, Carl S, Pomer S, Staehler G, Schnobel R, Weimer R, Opelz G. Cytokine monitoring of infection and rejection in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1995 Feb;27(1):884-6. No abstract available.
Weimer R, Zipperle S, Daniel V, Pomer S, Staehler G, Opelz G. IL-6 independent monocyte/B cell defect in renal transplant recipients with long-term stable graft function. Transplantation. 1994 Jan;57(1):54-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199401000-00011.
Weimer R, Daniel V, Zimmermann R, Schimpf K, Opelz G. Autoantibodies against CD4 cells are associated with CD4 helper defects in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Blood. 1991 Jan 1;77(1):133-40.
Weimer R, Daniel V, Pomer S, Opelz G. B lymphocyte response as an indicator of acute renal transplant rejection. II. Pretransplant and posttransplant B cell responses of m mitogen and donor cell-stimulated cultures. Transplantation. 1989 Oct;48(4):572-5.
Weimer R, Daniel V, Pomer S, Opelz G. B lymphocyte response as an indicator of acute renal transplant rejection. I. Immunoglobulin-secreting cells in peripheral blood. Transplantation. 1989 Oct;48(4):569-72.
Susal C, Dohler B, Opelz G. Graft-protective role of high pretransplantation IgA-anti-Fab autoantibodies: confirmatory evidence obtained in more than 4000 kidney transplants. The Collaborative Transplant Study. Transplantation. 2000 Apr 15;69(7):1337-40. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200004150-00021.
Pelzl S, Opelz G, Daniel V, Wiesel M, Susal C. Evaluation of posttransplantation soluble CD30 for diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection. Transplantation. 2003 Feb 15;75(3):421-3. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000044702.18327.66.
Susal C, Pelzl S, Dohler B, Opelz G. Identification of highly responsive kidney transplant recipients using pretransplant soluble CD30. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Jun;13(6):1650-6. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000014256.75920.5b.
Susal C, Opelz G. Kidney graft failure and presensitization against HLA class I and class II antigens. Transplantation. 2002 Apr 27;73(8):1269-73. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200204270-00014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NTx-PV-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.