Vinorelbine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT00128310

Last Updated: 2023-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

252 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-01-18

Study Completion Date

2008-01-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, randomized, prospective, Phase III study in which patients with advanced breast carcinoma previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes will be randomly assigned to receive one of two treatment options: vinorelbine (Arm A) or gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Arm B).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators assume that progression-free survival mean time for patients treated with vinorelbine will be 3 months, and for patients treated with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine will be 5 months. That implies a reduction in risk ratio of 40% (Hazard ratio = 1,67). Assuming a bilateral alpha error of 0.05 and beta error of 10%, and the number of events needed if 60% of patients have progressed after 1 year, the number of patients needed per treatment arm is 114. Considering a 10% post-randomization drop-out, the final number of patients is 252 (126 per arm).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Neoplasm Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Vinorelbine

Arm A: Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 will be administered as an intravenous infusion over 6-10 minutes on Study Days 1 and 8.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vinorelbine

Intervention Type DRUG

Arm B: Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine

Arm B: Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 will be administered as an intravenous infusion over 6-10 minutes on Study Days 1 and 8. Gemcitabine will be administered following vinorelbine at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vinorelbine

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vinorelbine

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Navelbine Gemzar

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological or cytological diagnoses of breast cancer, with metastases.
* Metastatic lesions should not be curable with surgery or radiotherapy.
* Women of age \> 18.
* To have received a previous treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes.
* A maximum of 2 previous chemotherapy treatment lines for metastatic disease.
* Previous radiotherapy is allowed, whenever the radiated area is not the only disease location.
* At least 4 weeks since the last previous antineoplastic treatment; patient must have recovered from all previous toxicities.
* Performance status \< 2 in World Health Organization (WHO) scale.
* Clinically measurable, non measurable or really non measurable disease, as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria.
* Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
* Patients able to comply and to receive an adequate follow-up.
* Adequate bone marrow function: neutrophils ≥ 2 x 10\^9/L; platelets ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L; hemoglobin ≥ 100 g/L.
* Calcium within normal limits.
* Premenopausal women must adopt an adequate contraceptive method during the study and up to 3 months after treatment finalization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Active infection or serious concomitant disease (investigator's criteria).
* Clinical evidence of metastases in the central nervous system (CNS).
* Blastic bone lesions as only disease.
* Previous neurological toxicity grade 3-4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v.2.0.
* Previous treatment with gemcitabine and/or vinorelbine.
* More than 2 previous chemotherapy treatment lines for metastatic disease.
* Abnormal liver function (bilirubin \> 2.0-fold upper normal limit (UNL); alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) \>2.5-fold UNL). In patients with hepatic metastasis, a value of ALT and AST of up to 5-fold UNL is permitted.
* Unpaired renal function (creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL).
* Pregnancy or lactating.
* Treatment with any investigational agent in the previous 4 weeks.
* Second malignancy (except for cervix carcinoma in situ or skin carcinoma - no melanoma- with an adequate treatment). Previous malignancies are allowed if disease-free survival is superior to 5 years, except for renal carcinoma or melanoma.
* Males.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)

San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Grupo Andino de Investigación en Oncología (GAICO)

Valencia, , Venezuela

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain Venezuela

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martin M, Ruiz A, Munoz M, Balil A, Garcia-Mata J, Calvo L, Carrasco E, Mahillo E, Casado A, Garcia-Saenz JA, Escudero MJ, Guillem V, Jara C, Ribelles N, Salas F, Soto C, Morales-Vasquez F, Rodriguez CA, Adrover E, Mel JR; Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Mar;8(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70041-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17329192 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.geicam.org

Click here for more information about this study

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GEICAM 2000-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lapatinib in Combination With Vinorelbine
NCT01013740 COMPLETED PHASE2
Lapatinib in Combination With Vinorelbine
NCT01128543 COMPLETED PHASE2