Trial of Vinflunine Versus Alkylating Agent in Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01091168

Last Updated: 2019-09-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

594 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have already received anthracyclines, taxanes, antimetabolites and vinca-alkaloids and have developed drug resistance to these drugs, therapeutic options are very limited. Alkylating agents showed a modest activity in pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This phase III trial will compare the effectiveness and the safety profile of vinflunine to an alkylating agent of physician choice in MBC patients who have exhausted anthracyclines, taxanes, antimetabolites and vinca-alkaloids.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains incurable, and current goals of therapy are to ameliorate symptoms, delay disease progression, improve or at least maintain quality of life (QoL), and prolong overall survival (OS).There are a number of agents with established single-agent activity, with the anthracyclines and taxanes considered generally the most active. In addition, several drugs with different mechanisms of action such as antimetabolites and vinca-alkaloids have also demonstrated substantial activity in the metastatic setting as single-agents or in combination.

In patients who progress after having received anthracyclines, taxanes, antimetabolites and vinca- alkaloids, therapeutic options are scarce. In this heavily pretreated population for whom overall survival is not expected to exceed 6 to 7 months, there is a clear need for novel therapies.

Vinflunine (VFL) is a microtubule inhibitor obtained by semi-synthesis, interacts with tubulin at the vinca-binding domain and inhibits tubulin assembly by perturbing microtubule dynamics and mitotic spindles without affecting assembled microtubules. VFL antitumour activity was fully demonstrated against a large and varied panel of murine and xenograft models.

The main haematological toxicity reported was the neutropenia Grade 3-4 (40-50%). The incidence of its complications (febrile neutropenia and neutropenic infection) was less than 8%. The main non-haematological toxicity Grade 3-4 (with an incidence more than 10%) reported were constipation and fatigue.

This was a prospective multicentre, open-label, randomised (1:1), phase III study comparing OS in patients treated with vinflunine versus those treated with an alkylating agent of physician's choice as third line treatment or more for patients with locally recurrent and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with and no longer candidate to anthracyclines, antimetabolites, taxanes and vinca- alkaloids..

The primary endpoint for the trial was OS. Patients were assessed for toxicity, tumour response and progression and status (alive-dead) at regular intervals during the study treatment and the follow-up period. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or investigator's decision. After the study treatment discontinuation, patients were followed until death.

The VFL dose of 280 mg/m² was the selected dose for this phase III study in patients with heavily pre- treated MBC. Indeed, VFL dose was reduced from 320 to 280 mg/m² in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract patients with performance status (PS) of 1 or with PS of 0 and having received prior pelvic irradiation. This dose was more regularly tolerable in patients with advanced disease stage who were heavily pre-treated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Metastases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

arm A: Vinflunine

Patients randomised in the test arm (arm A) received VFL at the dose of 280 mg/m² on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks, over a 20-minute intravenous (IV) infusion. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

vinflunine

Intervention Type DRUG

280 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks

arm B: Alkylating agent of physician choice

Patients randomised in the control arm (arm B) received an alkylating agent used as a single agent which was available in the investigational center and was approved for the treatment of cancer in the country.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alkylating agent of physician choice registered in cancer

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide or melphalan or mitomycin C or thiotepa or cisplatin or carboplatin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vinflunine

280 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Alkylating agent of physician choice registered in cancer

cyclophosphamide or melphalan or mitomycin C or thiotepa or cisplatin or carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

JAVLOR L00070 Various

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients 18 to 75 years of age with metastatic breast cancer histologically/cytologically confirmed not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy and who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens including anthracyclines,taxanes,antimetabolite and vinca-alkaloid and are no longer candidate for these drugs,
* Karnofsky performance score of at least 70 %, adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions and ECG without clinically relevant abnormality.

Exclusion Criteria

* Concurrent serious uncontrolled medical disorder,
* known or clinical evidence of brain metastases or leptomeningeal involvement,
* pulmonary lymphangitis or symptomatic pleural effusion or symptomatic ascites,
* history of second primary malignancy,
* HIV infection, preexisting neuropathy,
* pregnancy or breast feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pierre Fabre Medicament

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karim Keddad, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

San Martín, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Grodno, , Belarus

Site Status

Homyel, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Vitebsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Haine-Saint-Paul, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Lorient, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Aviano, , Italy

Site Status

Bolzano, , Italy

Site Status

Brindisi, , Italy

Site Status

Frattamaggiore, , Italy

Site Status

Macerata, , Italy

Site Status

Orbassano, , Italy

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Engel's, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Stavropol, , Russia

Site Status

Tambov, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Khmelnytskyi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Burnley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cornwell, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Derby, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Ipswich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Preston, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Worthing, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Austria Belarus Belgium France Germany Italy Portugal Russia South Africa Spain Taiwan Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cortes J, Perez-Garcia J, Levy C, Gomez Pardo P, Bourgeois H, Spazzapan S, Martinez-Janez N, Chao TC, Espie M, Nabholtz JM, Gonzalez Farre X, Beliakouski V, Roman Garcia J, Holgado E, Campone M. Open-label randomised phase III trial of vinflunine versus an alkylating agent in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):881-887. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy051.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29481630 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

L00070 IN 308 B0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.