Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
3120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-31
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Telephone Counseling and the Distribution of Nicotine Patches to Smokers
NCT00851357
Centralized Telephone Outreach to Assist Smoking Cessation Among Veterans
NCT00012948
Telephone Counseling for Tobacco Cessation
NCT01489579
Internet and Telephone Counseling for Smoking Cessation
NCT00282009
Tech and Telephone Smoking Cessation Treatment for Young Veterans With PTSD
NCT03552978
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite 40 years of progress, smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death in the United States, responsible for 435,000 deaths per year. Smoking is a particular problem within the VA, as VA users smoke substantially more than the general population across all categories of sex, age, and race. When adjusted for age and gender, the rate of smoking among VA users is 10% higher than the general US population - 33% vs. 23%. The prevalence of heavy tobacco users (defined as \>20 cigarettes per day) in the VA is more than double that of the non-VA U.S. population (7.4% vs. 3.5%).
Current VA policy and new VA/DoD guidelines both mandate that patients be offered treatment (medications and counseling), regardless of whether they attend a smoking cessation program. Thus it is essential to treat patients within primary care, since most smokers interested in quitting cannot or will not attend a cessation program.
Objectives:
This project sought to make smoking cessation an area of excellence for two VA networks by adapting and expanding the primary care-based Telephone Care Coordination Program (TCCP) throughout Sierra Pacific Healthcare Network (VISN 21) and Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VISN 22).
This regional expansion built on the TCCP, a very successful VA Substance Use Disorder QUERI demonstration project implemented at two facilities. In the demonstration project, across the 10 intervention sites, there were 2,900 referrals for smoking cessation in 10 months. VA care coordinators proactively contacted patients and connected them with the California Smokers' Helpline. About 45% of patients starting treatment were abstinent six months later--equal to or better than smoking cessation clinics. A cost analysis showed substantial savings per quitter compared to provider-based and clinic-based programs.
Methods:
We developed a telephone-based smoking cessation program that was integrated as a routine clinical care option at five VISN 21 and VISN 22 facilities (38 clinic sites). Referrals to the program were generated by a provider during a visit through a brief consult in CPRS. Program staff then recruited patients and, after obtaining consent, enrolled the patients into treatment. Data were collected at the site level (quantity of referrals, service origins, etc.) and at the patient level (demographics, enrollment rates, abstinence rates at six months, etc.).
This project was a group randomized trial testing of whether telephone care coordination increases the rate of smoking cessation treatment. At the patient level, two questions are addressed:
1. Is proactive care coordination (counselor initiates the call to the patient) more effective than reactive coordination (coordinator waits for the patient to call)?
2. Is multi-session counseling more effective than brief primary care-based counseling plus self-help materials?
We randomly allocated all participating sites within VISNs 21 and 22 to either self-help or intensive counseling treatment arms. We randomly allocated each week of program referrals to either proactive or reactive care coordination. All patients received brief smoking cessation counseling from their primary care physician, smoking cessation medications (after study enrollment by the VA care coordinator), and a follow-up call at 6 months. Care coordination was provided by VA clinical staff (donated as in-kind support from the participating facilities). Intensive counseling was provided by the California Smokers' Helpline.
Status:
Complete except for ongoing data analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1 - proactive, intensive counseling
Proactive outreach to counseling; multi-session counseling from California Smokers' Helpline
Proactive outreach to counseling
Project staff reach out to engage referred smoker into telephone counseling
Intensive counseling
Multi-session telephone counseling, delivered by California Smokers' Helpline
Arm 2 - reactive, intensive counseling
Reactive outreach to counseling; multi-session counseling from California Smokers' Helpline
Reactive outreach to counseling
Project staff send a letter to referred smoker, asking them to call to engage in telephone counseling
Intensive counseling
Multi-session telephone counseling, delivered by California Smokers' Helpline
Arm 3 - proactive, self-help
Proactive outreach to engage smoker in treatment; mailed self-help materials
Proactive outreach to counseling
Project staff reach out to engage referred smoker into telephone counseling
Self-help
Project staff send out self-help materials for smoking cessation
Arm 4 - reactive, self-help
Reactive approach to engaging smoker in treatment; mailed self-help materials
Reactive outreach to counseling
Project staff send a letter to referred smoker, asking them to call to engage in telephone counseling
Self-help
Project staff send out self-help materials for smoking cessation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proactive outreach to counseling
Project staff reach out to engage referred smoker into telephone counseling
Reactive outreach to counseling
Project staff send a letter to referred smoker, asking them to call to engage in telephone counseling
Intensive counseling
Multi-session telephone counseling, delivered by California Smokers' Helpline
Self-help
Project staff send out self-help materials for smoking cessation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Smoker
* Patient wants to quit smoking
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
California Smokers' Helpline
OTHER
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Scott E Sherman, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New York, NY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda
Sepulveda, California, United States
New York, NY
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fu SS, Sherman SE, Yano EM, van Ryn M, Lanto AB, Joseph AM. Ethnic disparities in the use of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in an equal access health care system. Am J Health Promot. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(2):108-16. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.108.
Sherman SE, Takahashi N, Kalra P, Gifford E, Finney JW, Canfield J, Kelly JF, Joseph GJ, Kuschner W. Care coordination to increase referrals to smoking cessation telephone counseling: a demonstration project. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Mar;14(3):141-8.
Sherman SE, Krebs P, York LS, Cummins SE, Kuschner W, Guvenc-Tuncturk S, Zhu SH. Telephone care co-ordination for tobacco cessation: randomised trials testing proactive versus reactive models. Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):78-82. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053327. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMV 04-088
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.