Internet and Telephone Counseling for Smoking Cessation
NCT ID: NCT00282009
Last Updated: 2016-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2205 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-08-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying two different computer-based smoking cessation programs to compare how well they work with or without telephone counseling in helping smokers quit smoking.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Telephone Counseling for Tobacco Cessation
NCT01489579
Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Smokers
NCT01289275
Improving the Population-Wide Effectiveness of U.S. Tobacco Cessation Quitlines
NCT01087905
Computer-Assisted Stop-Smoking Program in Helping Doctors Counsel Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes
NCT00865553
Comparison of Four Different Smoking Cessation Programmes
NCT01487642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Compare the efficacy of premium internet intervention vs premium internet with telephone intervention vs basic internet intervention, as determined by 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12 months, in adult smokers.
* Compare the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in promoting smoking cessation.
* Determine the effects of internet-based interventions on measured use of the intervention (frequency and duration of use, utilization of behavioral coping, expert advices, and e-mail) in these patients.
* Determine the effects of internet-based interventions on variables important for behavior change including mediators (e.g., self-efficacy, use of internet social support) and moderators (e.g., gender, baseline motivation) of outcomes in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to gender and baseline motivation level. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 intervention arms.
* Arm I (basic internet program): Patients are directed to a website of existing QuitNetâ„¢ smoking cessation materials. These materials are not tailored and have no interactive features.
* Arm II (premium internet program): Patients receive free 6-month access to the QuitNetâ„¢ website including interactive and individualized intervention features.
* Arm III (premium internet program plus telephone counseling): Patients receive free access to the QuitNetâ„¢ website as in arm II. Patients also receive up to 5 telephone counseling sessions, scheduled at their convenience.
All patients are assessed at baseline and then at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,205 patients will be accrued for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Basic Internet
Basic Internet
Basic Internet
Basic Internet control intervention
Enhanced Internet
Enhanced Internet
Enhanced Internet
enhanced Internet cessation intervention
Enhanced Internet plus Phone
Enhanced Internet + proactive telephone counseling
Enhanced Internet + phone
enhanced Internet plus proactive telephone counseling
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Basic Internet
Basic Internet control intervention
Enhanced Internet
enhanced Internet cessation intervention
Enhanced Internet + phone
enhanced Internet plus proactive telephone counseling
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Smokes at least 5 cigarettes a day
* No prior use of QuitNet website
* Must have access to the internet and a telephone at home or work
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
* Not specified
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* Not specified
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Georgetown University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amanda L. Graham, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Georgetown University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Graham AL, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Characteristics of smokers reached and recruited to an internet smoking cessation trial: a case of denominators. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-8. doi: 10.1080/14622200601042521.
Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Baskin-Sommers A, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49-57. doi: 10.1080/14622200601045367.
Graham AL, Papandonatos GD. Reliability of internet- versus telephone-administered questionnaires in a diverse sample of smokers. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Mar 26;10(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.987.
Graham AL, Cobb NK, Papandonatos GD, Moreno JL, Kang H, Tinkelman DG, Bock BC, Niaura RS, Abrams DB. A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):46-53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.451.
Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Kang H, Moreno JL, Abrams DB. Development and validation of the online social support for smokers scale. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 28;13(3):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1801.
Graham AL, Chang Y, Fang Y, Cobb NK, Tinkelman DS, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Mandelblatt JS. Cost-effectiveness of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation: an economic evaluation of The iQUITT Study. Tob Control. 2013 Nov;22(6):e11. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050465. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Cobb CO, Niaura RS, Donaldson EA, Graham AL. Quit now? Quit soon? Quit when you're ready? Insights about target quit dates for smoking cessation from an online quit date tool. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 17;16(2):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3086.
Cobb CO, Graham AL. Use of non-assigned interventions in a randomized trial of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Oct;16(10):1289-97. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu066. Epub 2014 May 8.
Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Cobb CO, Cobb NK, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Tinkelman DG. Internet and Telephone Treatment for smoking cessation: mediators and moderators of short-term abstinence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Mar;17(3):299-308. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu144. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Erar B, Stanton CA. Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: Results of propensity score weighting. Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S(0):1286-95. doi: 10.1037/hea0000278.
Theodoulou A, Fanshawe TR, Leavens E, Theodoulou E, Wu AD, Heath L, Stewart C, Nollen N, Ahluwalia JS, Butler AR, Hajizadeh A, Thomas J, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J. Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDR0000465179
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.