Clinical Trial of New Elastomer for Maxillofacial Prosthetics
NCT ID: NCT00123097
Last Updated: 2017-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-02-28
2009-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implant Survival and Peri-abutment Tissue Reactions of Extra-oral Implants.
NCT03182361
Effect of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix on the Peri-implant Tissues of Immediate Implants.
NCT04980313
Clinical Evaluation of a New Printable Denture Base Material
NCT06458738
Retention, Stability and Performance Assessment of Denture Fixatives Versus no Fixative Control
NCT05689814
Regenerative Treatment of Peri-implantitis
NCT06153212
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* treats few patients, making the subspecialty unprofitable for manufacturers to develop new materials;
* offers fundamental rehabilitation and improvement in the quality of life to patients who may have exhausted personal or third party funding; and
* provides a dental solution to an essentially medical problem.
Silicone rubber materials have been used for facial rehabilitation for more than 4 decades with few improvements. There is a clear need for new, alternative, and more economic materials for extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. Research at Gulf South Research Institute in New Orleans by the Principal Investigator and others in the 1970s and 1980s developed an alternative low-cost thermoplastic industrial rubber material (chlorinated polyethylene, CPE) that met all toxicological (safety) and physical (effectiveness) requirements. A Phase 2 clinical trial at the time yielded equivocal results when compared to conventional but costly silicone rubber products.
This research is a controlled, randomized, single-crossover, double-blinded investigator-initiated multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial treating 100 patients that evaluates:
* experimental thermoplastic CPE; and
* control silicone (Silastic Adhesive A/MDX4-4210) materials for non-inferiority of CPE based on functional and subjective characteristics, and on the quality of life.
The clinical centers of the trial are at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, and at the Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chlorinated polyethylene elastomer first
Patient receives prosthetic made from CPE then the SOC, silicon.
Chlorinated polyethylene elastomer
Chlorinated polyethylene
Silicon first
Patient receives prosthetic made from the SOC, silicon, followed by the CPE,Chlorinated polyethylene elastomer.
Chlorinated polyethylene elastomer
Chlorinated polyethylene
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chlorinated polyethylene elastomer
Chlorinated polyethylene
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fully healed wound (6 months after surgery and/or radiation)
* Defect no larger than 9 x 12 cm (3.5 x 4.5 inches, the diameter of a giant bronze flask)
* Cognizant enough to answer questionnaires
* Agrees to wear the prosthesis at least 6 hours per day
* Agrees to use the prescribed adhesive (Epithane-3 - now called Daro Adhesive Extra Strength) and clean and store as instructed
* Plans to be able to return to the research institution for a 10 month period
* Able to manage prosthesis him/herself or with caregiver for a 10 month period
* Karnofsky score greater than or equal to 60 (www.hospicepatients.org/karnofsky.html)
* No framework or implant/magnet retention
* No multiple recurrences of tumor
* No hypersensitivity to adhesives or test materials
* No current systemic or topical facial steroid treatment
* Not legally blind
* Not expected to have further surgeries to defect, radiation therapy, or other cytoreductive therapy over the next 10 months
* No evidence of active skin condition/disease
* Not an infectious risk patient
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
NIH
University of Louisville
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lawrence M. Gettleman, DMD, MSD
Professor, Gratis
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sudarat Kiat-amnuay, DDS MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Texas Dental Branch
Mark S Chambers, DMD MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dept. of Head & Neck Surgery
James D Anderson, DDS MScD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Lawrence Gettleman, DMD, MSD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Louisville, School of Dentistry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kiat-amnuay S, Jacob RF, Chambers MS, Anderson JD, Sheppard RA, Johnston DA, Haugh GS, Gettleman L. Clinical trial of chlorinated polyethylene for facial prosthetics. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):263-70.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.