Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease (ACT I)
NCT ID: NCT00106938
Last Updated: 2017-07-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1663 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Subjects at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) (PROTECT)
NCT00402740
Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting in Asymptomatic Patients
NCT00883402
Carotid Endarterectomy vs. Repeated Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis
NCT05390983
Carotid Artery Stenting Outcomes in the Standard Risk Population for Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT01445613
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
NCT00583817
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
CAS group: 3:1 ratio of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) versus Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA).
Subjects will be followed at 30 days, six (6), and 12 months post-procedure, and annually for four (4) additional years.
Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
2
CEA group: 3:1 ratio of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) versus Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA).
Subjects will be followed at 30 days, six (6), and 12 months post-procedure, and annually for four (4) additional years.
Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Female subjects of child bearing potential must have a documented negative pregnancy test within 30 days prior to the study procedure.
3. Subject must be asymptomatic, defined as no stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack \[(TIA);(hemispheric or ocular)\] within the 180 days prior to the procedure. Subjects who have experienced these neurological symptoms prior to the 180 day pre-procedure window will be eligible for enrollment. An independent study neurologist or independent study neurosurgeon must confirm the subject's neurological status.
4. Subjects taking warfarin may be included if their dosage is reduced before the procedure to result in an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 1.5 or less. Warfarin may be restarted after the procedure.
5. The subject must sign a written informed consent prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local institutional review board (IRB).
6. The subject must agree to return for all required follow-up visits.
7. Subject has a discrete lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA); the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA) may be involved.
8. Carotid stenosis ≥ 70% and ≤ 99% by carotid ultrasound or ≥ 70% and ≤ 99% stenosis (visual estimate) by angiography, without significant (\> 60% by ultrasound or angiography) ICA/CCA contralateral stenosis.
9. Target ICA vessel diameter must be visually estimated to be:
\> 2.5 mm and \< 7.0 for the Emboshield Pro or for the Emboshield NAV6, \> 2.8 mm and \< 6.2 for the Emboshield Gen 3 And \> 4.0 mm and \< 9.0 mm for the Xact stent treatment segment. An untreated contralateral ICA may be used for visual estimation when a highly stenosed lesion makes measurement of the target vessel inaccurate.
10. Based on the subject's anatomy, the Investigator should expect to successfully deliver the stent to the target lesion (absence of extreme tortuosity, etc.).
11. De novo target lesion that can be treated with a single stent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject is participating in another drug or device trial (IND or IDE) that has not completed the primary endpoint or that may potentially confound the results of this trial. Subject may be enrolled only once in this trial and may not participate in any other clinical trial during a 1-year period post-index procedure.
3. Subject has inability to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
4. Subject has had an intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic stroke within 1-year prior the index procedure.
5. Subject has dementia or has a neurological illness that may confound the neurological evaluation.
6. Subject has had a known untoward reaction to anesthesia or contrast media not able to be overcome by pre-treatment with medications.
7. Subject has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications including aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®) or Ticlopidine (Ticlid®), heparin or Bivalirudin (Angiomax™). Subjects must be able to tolerate a combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel/Ticlopidine.
8. Subject has Hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 10 gm/dL, platelet count \<100,000/mm3 or \>500,000/mm3, or known heparin associated thrombocytopenia.
9. Subject has an active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or will refuse blood transfusions.
10. Subject has had a GI bleed that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
11. Subject has known cardiac sources of emboli, including paroxysmal or sustained atrial fibrillation (treated or untreated).
12. Subject has had an myocardial infarction (MI) within the previous 30 days.
13. Subject has any condition that limits their anticipated survival to less than 3 years.
14. Subject is a high risk surgical candidate defined as the presence of any one or more of a following medical conditions:
1. Two or more proximal diseased coronary arteries of \> 70% stenosis that have not or cannot be revascularized or \< 30 days since revascularization.
2. Ejection fraction \< 30% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure functional class 3 or higher.
3. Unstable angina, defined as angina at rest with ECG changes.
4. On a list for major organ transplant or is being evaluated for such.
5. Known history of respiratory insufficiency, forced expiratory volume (FEV1) \< 30% (predicted).
6. Chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \>2.5 mg/dL).
7. Uncontrolled diabetes defined as fasting glucose \> 400 mg/dL.
8. Concurrent requirement for any invasive procedure 30 days pre- or post-procedure.
9. Age ≥ 80 years.
15. Subject may be considered a non-surgical candidate for CEA as a result of one or more anatomic conditions or features which preclude normal surgical access or a high surgical risk because of the presence of any one or more anatomic conditions that present an increased potential for adverse events. These subjects are not eligible for enrollment.
1. Subject has had radiation treatment to the neck.
2. Subject has had a radical neck dissection.
3. Surgically inaccessible lesions (i.e., lesions extending above the level of C2).
4. Spinal immobility - inability to flex neck beyond neutral or kyphotic deformity.
5. Presence of carotid artery dissection, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, arteritis or fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) in the target vessel.
6. Hemodynamically significant (\>60%) stenosis of the right or left common carotid artery (LCCA/RCCA) below the clavicle.
7. Presence of tracheostomy stoma.
8. Contralateral laryngeal nerve paralysis.
9. Previous carotid endarterectomy, extracranial-intracranial or carotid subclavian bypass procedure ipsilateral to the carotid stenosis.
10. Severe hypertension (defined as blood pressure \> Systolic of 180 mm Hg and/or a diastolic of 110 mm Hg) not adequately controlled by anti-hypertensive therapy at the time of study entry.
16. Severe vascular disease including tortuosity and/or occlusive disease that would preclude the safe introduction of a guiding catheter/sheath, cerebral protection device, balloon catheter, stent delivery system or stent placement. Severe tortuosity is defined as 2 or more \>90 degree bend points within 3cm of the target stenosis. One of these bends will be considered to be present if the ICA branches from the CCA at a 90 degree angle. This includes aortic arch anatomy that is unacceptable for carotid stent placement.
17. Intraluminal filling defect thought to represent thrombus.
18. Excessive calcification: defined as fluoroscopic evidence of calcium that extends circumferentially around the target lesion and includes the majority of the atherosclerotic plaque.
19. Occlusion (TIMI 0 flow), or string sign of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
20. The target lesion requires treatment with a device other than percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) prior to stent placement.
21. Significant (\> 60%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede run off.
22. Presence of a previously placed intravascular stent in the ipsilateral carotid distribution.
23. Cerebral aneurysm (symptomatic or \> 10 mm) or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the cerebral vasculature.
24. Bilateral carotid stenosis (ICA/CCA contralateral stenosis \> 60% by ultrasound or angiography).
18 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jon Matsumura, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Kenneth Rosenfield, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Luke's Hospital-Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Fogarty Clinical Research Inc./El Camino Hospital
Mountain View, California, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital
Newport Beach, California, United States
St. Joseph Hospital
Orange, California, United States
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Hawaii Permanente Medical Group - Kaiser
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Northwestern University Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
St. John's Hospital and Memorial Medical Center/ Prairie Heart Cooperative
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Parkview Hospital
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Central Baptist Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Harper University Hospital/Detroit Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
McLaren Regional Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
St. John's Mercy Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, United States
Millard Fillmore Hospital
Buffalo, New York, United States
NYU Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Columbia Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester-Strong Memorial Hospital
Rochester, New York, United States
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
WakeMed Health and Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health and Science University Stroke Center
Portland, Oregon, United States
Heritage Valley Health System
Beaver, Pennsylvania, United States
Harrisburg Hospital / Pinnacle Health
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Physicians Division of Vascular Surgery/Shadyside Medical
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Washington, Pennsylvania, United States
St. Joseph's Medical Center/Berks Cardiologists
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Providence Hospital-SC
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
North Central Heart Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
The Stern Cardiovascular Center/Methodist Germantown Hospital
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Mercy Medical West/Turkey Creek Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Westlake Medical Center/Seton Heart Institute
Austin, Texas, United States
Heart Hospital of Austin
Austin, Texas, United States
Dallas Veteran's Administration Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Chesapeake General Hospital/Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
St. Mary's Hospital / Virginia Cardiovascular Specilists
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Deaconess Medical Center
Spokane, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
St. Luke's Medical Center - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Weinberg I, Beckman JA, Matsumura JS, Rosenfield K, Ansel GM, Chaturvedi S, Gray W, Metzger DC, Riles T, Shu Y, Wechsler L, Jaff MR. Carotid Stent Fractures Are Not Associated With Adverse Events: Results From the ACT-1 Multicenter Randomized Trial (Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease). Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):49-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030030. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Rosenfield K, Matsumura JS, Chaturvedi S, Riles T, Ansel GM, Metzger DC, Wechsler L, Jaff MR, Gray W; ACT I Investigators. Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AVD-640-0052
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.